journal article·2023-08

CdSe thin films-based photodetector doped with Cu, In and Ga atoms: a comparative work

S. Yılmaz, İ. Polat, M. Tomakin, T. Küçükömeroğlu, E. Bacaksız

Applied Physics A· Volume 129· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

The present work demonstrates a comparison of performance of Cu, In and Ga-doped CdSe thin films-based photodetectors. Structural, morphological, optical and electrical investigation of Cu, In and Ga-doped CdSe thin films prepared by close space sublimation on glass slides is also achieved. It is obtained that Cu, In and Ga-doped CdSe thin films have a good crystal quality with a hexagonal structure in the preferred orientation along (002) plane. Morphological examination shows that Cu-doped CdSe thin films grow in the porous microstructure while In and Ga-doped CdSe films possess compact and uniform morphology without any voids. Transparency of In and Ga-doped CdSe films are higher than that of Cu-doped CdSe throughout the entire spectrum. Band gap values of all the samples are determined to be almost 1.72 eV. Photoluminescence data indicate that Ga-doped CdSe thin films display a deep level band at the lowest peak intensity, which is the indication of less defected structure. All the samples exhibit n-type conductivity. Additionally, the maximum carrier density and the minimum resistivity are reached for In-doped CdSe thin films as 1.75 × 1016 cm−3 and 6.12 Ω cm, respectively. Rise time of 28 ms and fall time of 25 ms are obtained for Cu-doped CdSe thin films-based photodetector, which are the fastest photoresponse within all the devices. Furthermore, Cu-doped CdSe thin films-based device has a responsivity of 1.20 × 10–2 A/W and a detectivity of 1.20 × 109 Jones that makes Cu-doped CdSe thin films-based device as a strong candidate for high sensitive photodetector applications.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. P. Chauhan, A.B. Patel, S. Narayan, J. Prasad, C.K. Sumesh, G.K. Solanki, K.D. Patel, S.S. Soni, P.K. Jha, V.M. Pathak, V. Patel, J. Alloys Compd. 862, 158017 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15801610.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158016 ↗
2. S. Sadeghi, S.K. Abkenar, C.W. Ow-Yang, S. Nizamoglu, Sci. Rep. 9, 10061 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46581-210.1038/s41598-019-46581-2 ↗
3. N.G. Patel, C.J. Panchal, K.K. Makhija, Cryst. Res. Technol. 29, 1013 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.217029071710.1002/crat.2170290717 ↗
4. M.M. Rahman, M.R. Karim, H.F. Alharbi, B. Aldokhayel, T. Uzzaman, H. Zahir, Chem. Asian J. 16, 902 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.20200136910.1002/asia.202001369 ↗
5. N.T. Shelke, S.C. Karle, B.R. Karche, J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Electron. 31, 15061 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-04069-010.1007/s10854-020-04069-0 ↗
6. E. Bacaksiz, B.M. Basol, M. Altunbaş, S. Yılmaz, M. Tomakin, B. Abay, Stat. Sol. (b) 244, 497 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.20064220710.1002/pssb.200642207 ↗
7. D. Kumar, C. Lal, D. Veer, D. Singh, P. Kumar, R.S. Katiyar, Phys. Scr. 98, 055930 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/accabc10.1088/1402-4896/accabc ↗
8. S.S. Kulkarni, U.P. Gawai, S.D. Kamble, D.P. Upasani, J.V. Sali, R. Venkatesh, D.S. Bhavsar, J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Electron. 52, 3352 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-023-10310-310.1007/s11664-023-10310-3 ↗
9. H. Ilchuk, R. Petrus, A. Kashuba, I. Semkiv, E. Zmiiovska, Mol. Cryst. Liq. 699, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/15421406.2020.173253210.1080/15421406.2020.1732532 ↗
10. S. Kumar, S. Valanarasu, K.V. Gunavathy, S. Vinoth, K. Haunsbhavi, D. Alagarasan, K.D.A. Kumar, M. Ubaidullah, S.F. Shaikh, B. Pandit, Phys. Scr. 97, 055807 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ac619c10.1088/1402-4896/ac619c ↗
11. Y. Jiang, W.J. Zhang, J.S. Jie, X.M. Meng, X. Fan, S.-T. Lee, Adv. Funct. Mater. 17, 1795 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20060035110.1002/adfm.200600351 ↗
12. E. Shalev, E. Oksenberg, K. Rechav, R. Popovitz-Biro, E. Joselevich, ACS Nano 11, 213 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b0446910.1021/acsnano.6b04469 ↗
13. Q. An, X. Meng, K. Xiong, Y. Qiu, W. Lin, J. Alloys Compd. 726, 214 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.33610.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.336 ↗
14. A.M. Smirnov, A.D. Golinskaya, P.A. Kotin, S.G. Dorofeev, V.V. Palyulin, V.N. Mantsevich, V.S. Dneprovskii, J. Lumin. 213, 29 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2019.05.00110.1016/j.jlumin.2019.05.001 ↗
15. H. Luo, C. Tuinenga, E.B. Guidez, C. Lewis, J. Shipman, S. Roy, C.M. Aikens, V. Chikan, J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 10749 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0196310.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01963 ↗
16. S.N. Moger, M.G. Mahesha, Micro Nanostruct. 168, 207335 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micrna.2022.20733510.1016/j.micrna.2022.207335 ↗
17. Z. Hu, X. Zhang, C. Xie, C. Wu, X. Zhang, L. Bian, Y. Wu, L. Wang, Y. Zhang, J. Jie, Nanoscale 3, 4798 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c1nr10619h10.1039/c1nr10619h ↗
18. J. Qiu, Y. Liu, Z. Cai, Q. Phan, Z. Shi, Mater. Adv. 3, 1079 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ma00760b10.1039/d1ma00760b ↗
19. K. Sharma, Poonam, G.S.S. Saini, S.K. Tripathi, J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Electron. 29, 9596 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-8995-210.1007/s10854-018-8995-2 ↗
20. V.S. Raut, C.D. Lokhande, V.V. Killedar, J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 28, 3140 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5902-610.1007/s10854-016-5902-6 ↗
21. H.G. Chasta, D. Suthar, A. Thakur, M.D. Kannan, M.S. Dhaka, Mater. Res. Bull. 152, 111845 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2022.11184510.1016/j.materresbull.2022.111845 ↗
22. V.S. Raut, C.D. Lokhande, H.D. Shelke, V.V. Killedar, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 33, 13782 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-08310-w10.1007/s10854-022-08310-w ↗
23. W.J. Aziz, Mater. Res. Bull. 42, 148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-019-1830-410.1007/s12034-019-1830-4 ↗
24. S.B. Singh, M.V. Limaye, N.P. Lalla, S.K. Kulkarni, J. Lumin. 128, 1909 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2008.05.02210.1016/j.jlumin.2008.05.022 ↗
25. M.G.S.A. Basheer, K.S. Rajni, V.S. Vidhya, V. Swaminathan, A. Thayumanavan, K.R. Murali, M. Jayachandran, Cryst. Res. Technol. 46, 261 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.20100054610.1002/crat.201000546 ↗
26. S. Kumar, T.T. John, Mater. Chem. Phys. 286, 126222 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12622210.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126222 ↗
27. A.A. Hussain, B. Sharma, T. Barman, A.R. Pal, A.C.S. Appl, Mater. Interfaces 8, 4258 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b0024910.1021/acsami.6b00249 ↗
28. X. Li, Q. Tan, X. Feng, Q. Wang, Y. Liu, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 13, 171 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-018-2590-610.1186/s11671-018-2590-6 ↗
29. T. Takahashi, P. Nichols, K. Takei, A.C. Ford, A. Jamshidi, M.C. Wu, C.Z. Ning, A. Javey, Nanotechnology 23, 045201 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/4/04520110.1088/0957-4484/23/4/045201 ↗
30. G. Li, Y. Jiang, Y. Zhang, X. Lan, T. Zhai, G.-C. Yi, J. Mater. Chem. C 2, 8252 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TC01503G10.1039/C4TC01503G ↗
31. L. Zhang, H. Yu, W. Cao, Y. Dong, C. Zou, Y. Yang, S. Huang, N. Dai, D.-M. Zhu, Appl. Surf. Sci. 307, 608 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.04.08510.1016/j.apsusc.2014.04.085 ↗
32. C.P. Veeramalai, P. Kollu, G. Lin, X. Zhang, C. Li, Nanotechnology 32, 315204 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/abf87a10.1088/1361-6528/abf87a ↗
33. L. Du, Y. Lei, Mater. Lett. 106, 100 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2013.04.10710.1016/j.matlet.2013.04.107 ↗