journal article·2023-04

Investigation of structural, optical, electrical, magnetic and antibacterial properties of (Mn and Sm) co-doped CdO nanostructures

R. Halabi, A. M. Abdallah, Mahmoud I. Khalil, R. Awad, M. Mattar

Applied Physics A· Volume 129· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

This investigation studies the effect of Mn and Sm co-dopants on the properties of CdO nanostructures. With the aid of co-precipitation technique, Cd1–2xMnxSmxO (x = 0.00, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, and 0.04) nanostructures, denoted by CdO, co-0.5, co-1, co-2, co-3 and co-4, respectively were synthesized. The crystallinity and phase formation of the prepared samples were confirmed by X-ray powder diffraction. The doped samples exhibited larger lattice parameters and strain as compared to the pure sample. Transmission electron micrographs revealed the formation of nanowires for pure and low co-doped concentrations and nanowires with nanoclusters for higher co-doped concentrations. The Raman spectra disclosed the major phonon modes of CdO without any indicator from the co-dopants, proving that they were well integrated into the CdO lattice. The UV–Vis spectra revealed the tunable energy gap with the co-dopants’ concentration. The photoluminescence spectroscopy indicated the abundance of Cd interstitials and O/Cd vacancies. The DC conductivity indicated the metallic behavior of the prepared samples, triggered by Cd2+ vacancies, and the semiconducting behavior at high temperatures for co-1 and co-2. CdO and co-0.5 showed a weak ferromagnetic behavior combined with diamagnetic behavior; however, superparamagnetic along with an antiferromagnetic behavior was detected for higher doping concentrations. The origin of ferromagnetism may be related to O/Cd vacancies. Remarkably, all the samples prevented the growth of bacteria and formed well-defined zones around the samples with a stronger antibacterial activity on gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Citrobacter Braakii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae) than that on gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Streptococcus intermedius).
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. H. Sarica, S. Erten-Ela, Photovoltaic characterizations of nano-CdO based dye sensitized solar cells. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 14, 753–757 (2012)
2. N.B. Sonawane, P.K. Baviskar, R.R. Ahire, V.H. Ojha, B.R. Sankapal, Nanonecklace of CdO through simple solution chemistry. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 49, 81–83 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2016.03.02810.1016/j.mssp.2016.03.028 ↗
3. E.M. Sulaiman, U.M. Nayef, F.A.H. Mutlak, Synthesis and characterization of Au:CdO nanoparticles using laser ablation in liquid as gases sensors. Opt Laser Technol 154, 108336 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.10833610.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108336 ↗
4. T.F. Tefo, P. Beukes, A. Gurib-Fakim, M. Maaza, Green synthesis of Monteponite CdO nanoparticles by Agathosma betulina natural extract. J. Alloys Compd. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.27910.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.279 ↗
5. V.K. Gupta, A. Fakhri, S. Tahami, S. Agarwal, Zn doped CdO nanoparticles: structural, morphological, optical, photocatalytic and anti-bacterial properties. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 504, 164–170 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.05.02610.1016/j.jcis.2017.05.026 ↗
6. D.S. Dhawale, A.M. More, S.S. Latthe, K.Y. Rajpure, C.D. Lokhande, Room temperature synthesis and characterization of CdO nanowires by chemical bath deposition (CBD) method. Appl. Surf. Sci. 254, 3269–3273 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.11.01310.1016/j.apsusc.2007.11.013 ↗
7. M. Bououdina, M. El-Hilo, D. Anjum, M. Kanoun, Revealing a room temperature ferromagnetism in cadmium oxide nanoparticles: an experimental and first-principles study. RSC Adv. 5, 33233 (2015)10.1039/C5RA03069B ↗
8. I. ko, C. Pande, R. Masumura, Grain Boundaries in Nanomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420004014.ch18. (2006).10.1201/9781420004014.ch18 ↗
9. N. Manjula, A.R. Balu, Double doping (Mn+Cl) effects on the structural, morphological, photoluminescence, optoelectronic properties and antibacterial activity of CdO thin films. Optik 130, 464–472 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.10.07410.1016/j.ijleo.2016.10.074 ↗
10. T. Noorunnisha, M. Suganya, M. Karthika, C. Kayathiri, K. Usharani, S. Balamurugan, V.S. Nagarethinam, A.R. Balu, (Zn + Co) co-doped CdO thin films with improved figure of merit values and ferromagnetic orderings with low squareness ratio well suited for optoelectronic devices and soft magnetic materials applications. Appl. Phys. A. 126, 762 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-03954-z10.1007/s00339-020-03954-z ↗
11. N. Manjula, M. Suganya, D. Prabha, S. Balamurugan, J. Srivind, V.S. Nagarethinam, A.R. Balu, Optoelectronic, magnetic and antibacterial properties of CdO thin films doubly doped with Mn (cationic) and F (anionic) ions. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 28, 7615–7621 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-6454-010.1007/s10854-017-6454-0 ↗
12. N. Manjula, M. Pugalenthi, V.S. Nagarethinam, K. Usharani, A.R. Balu, Effect of doping concentration on the structural, morphological, optical and electrical properties of Mn-doped CdO thin films. Mater. Sci. Pol. 33, 774–781 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/msp-2015-011510.1515/msp-2015-0115 ↗
13. A.R. Xavier, A.T. Ravichandran, K. Ravichandran, S. Mantha, D. Ravinder, Sm doping effect on structural, morphological, luminescence and antibacterial activity of CdO nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 27, 11182–11187 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5237-310.1007/s10854-016-5237-3 ↗
14. D. Lombardo, M.A. Kiselev, M.T. Caccamo, Smart nanoparticles for drug delivery application: development of versatile nanocarrier platforms in biotechnology and nanomedicine. J. Nanomater. 2019, e3702518 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/370251810.1155/2019/3702518 ↗
15. H.H. Gustafson, D. Holt-Casper, D.W. Grainger, H. Ghandehari, Nanoparticle uptake: the phagocyte problem. Nano Today 10, 487–510 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2015.06.00610.1016/j.nantod.2015.06.006 ↗
16. M. Rashidzadeh, G. Carbajal-Franco, A. Tiburcio-Silver, Nanoparticulated hydrophobic CdO coatings deposited by microwave procedure. Micro Nano Lett. 10, 653–656 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1049/mnl.2015.032610.1049/mnl.2015.0326 ↗
17. M. Rashidzadeh, G. Carbajal-Franco, A. Tiburcio-Silver, Hydrophobic coatings composed by cubic-shaped CdO nanoparticles grown by a novel and simple microwave method. J. Nanopart. 2016, 8389647 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/838964710.1155/2016/8389647 ↗
18. G. Henkel, B. Krebs, Metallothioneins: zinc, cadmium, mercury, and copper thiolates and selenolates mimicking protein active site features—structural aspects and biological implications. Chem. Rev. 104, 801–824 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020620d10.1021/cr020620d ↗
19. R.K. Zalups, S. Ahmad, Molecular handling of cadmium in transporting epithelia. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 186, 163–188 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0041-008x(02)00021-210.1016/s0041-008x(02)00021-2 ↗
20. L. Zhang, J. Fan, H.N. Nguyen, S. Li, D.F. Rodrigues, Effect of cadmium on the performance of partial nitrification using sequencing batch reactor. Chemosphere 222, 913–922 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.00610.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.006 ↗
21. N. Sandhu, J.C. McGeer, M.M. Vijayan, Exposure to environmental levels of waterborne cadmium impacts corticosteroidogenic and metabolic capacities, and compromises secondary stressor performance in rainbow trout. Aquat. Toxicol. 146, 20–27 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2013.10.01010.1016/j.aquatox.2013.10.010 ↗
22. W.J. Adams, R. Blust, U. Borgmann, K.V. Brix, D.K. DeForest, A.S. Green, J.S. Meyer, J.C. McGeer, P.R. Paquin, P.S. Rainbow, C.M. Wood, Utility of tissue residues for predicting effects of metals on aquatic organisms. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 7, 75–98 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.10810.1002/ieam.108 ↗
23. E. Demir, T. Qin, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, X. Guo, T. Ingle, J. Yan, A.I. Orza, A.S. Biris, S. Ghorai, T. Zhou, T. Chen, Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of cadmium oxide nanoparticles evaluated using in vitro assays. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen 850–851, 503149 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2020.50314910.1016/j.mrgentox.2020.503149 ↗
24. X. Zhu, E. Hondroulis, W. Liu, C. Li, Biosensing approaches for rapid genotoxicity and cytotoxicity assays upon nanomaterial exposure. Small 9, 1821–1830 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20120159310.1002/smll.201201593 ↗
25. S.M. Hussain, K.L. Hess, J.M. Gearhart, K.T. Geiss, J.J. Schlager, In vitro toxicity of nanoparticles in BRL 3A rat liver cells. Toxicol. In Vitro 19, 975–983 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2005.06.03410.1016/j.tiv.2005.06.034 ↗
26. J.L. Blum, J.R. Edwards, W.C. Prozialeck, J.Q. Xiong, J.T. Zelikoff, Effects of maternal exposure to cadmium oxide nanoparticles during pregnancy on maternal and offspring kidney injury markers using a murine model. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 78, 711–724 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2015.102662210.1080/15287394.2015.1026622 ↗
27. J.L. Blum, L.K. Rosenblum, G. Grunig, M.B. Beasley, J.Q. Xiong, J.T. Zelikoff, Short-term inhalation of cadmium oxide nanoparticles alters pulmonary dynamics associated with lung injury, inflammation, and repair in a mouse model. Inhal. Toxicol. 26, 48–58 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2013.85174610.3109/08958378.2013.851746 ↗
28. S.T. Hossain, S.K. Mukherjee, CdO nanoparticle toxicity on growth, morphology, and cell division in Escherichia coli. Langmuir 28, 16614–16622 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/la302872y10.1021/la302872y ↗
29. M. Zahera, S.A. Khan, I.A. Khan, R.K. Sharma, N. Sinha, H.A. Al-Shwaiman, R.R. Al-Zahrani, A.M. Elgorban, A. Syed, M.S. Khan, Cadmium oxide nanoparticles: an attractive candidate for novel therapeutic approaches. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 585, 124017 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.12401710.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124017 ↗
30. S. Abbas, H. Basma, J. Al Boukhari, R. Awad, Characterization of CdO nanoparticles prepared by co-precipitation method under different pH and calcination temperatures, Appl. Phys. A. 127 (2021) 505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-021-04669-5.10.1007/s00339-021-04669-5 ↗
31. L. Lutterotti, Maud: a Rietveld analysis program designed for the internet and experiment integration. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A (2000). https://doi.org/10.1107/S010876730002195410.1107/S0108767300021954 ↗
32. R. Shannon, Revised effective ionic radii and systematic study of inter atomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. A 32, 751–767 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1107/s056773947600155110.1107/s0567739476001551 ↗
33. M. Bououdina, A.A. Dakhel, Creation of RT-FM in CdO nanocrystalline powder by codoping with Cu and Gd: effect of annealing in hydrogen atmosphere. J. Alloy Compd. 601, 162–166 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.02.14610.1016/j.jallcom.2014.02.146 ↗
34. M. Bououdina, Structural, optical, and magnetic properties of Cu- and Ni-codoped CdO dilute magnetic nanocrystalline semiconductor: effect of hydrogen post-treatment. Appl. Phys. A (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-015-9067-610.1007/s00339-015-9067-6 ↗
35. E.I. Gürbüz, R. Aydin, B. Şahin, A study of the influences of transition metal (Mn, Ni) co-doping on the morphological, structural and optical properties of nanostructured CdO films. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-8091-z10.1007/s10854-017-8091-z ↗
36. R. Aydin, B. Sahin, Li: Ce co-doped CdO films synthesized by SILAR method: effects of rare earth element Ce content on the physical attributes. Ceram. Int. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.34610.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.346 ↗
37. G. Vijayaprasath, R. Murugan, D. Asaithambi, P. Sakthivel, T. Mahalingam, Y. Hayakawa, G. Ravi, Structural and magnetic behavior of Ni/Mn co-doped ZnO nanoparticles prepared by co-precipitation method. Ceram. Int. 42, 2836–2845 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.11.01910.1016/j.ceramint.2015.11.019 ↗
38. L.K. Gaura, P. Gairola, S.P. Gairola, M.C. Mathpal, P. Kumar, S. Kumar, D. Kushavah, V. Agrahari, F.F.H. Aragon, M.A.G. Soler, H.C. Swart, Cobalt doping induced shape transformation and its effect on luminescence in zinc oxide rod-like nanostructures. J. Alloys Compd. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.15918910.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159189 ↗
39. L. Qian, S.C. Wang, Y. Zhao, K. Lu, Microstrain effect on thermal properties of nanocrystalline CU. Acta Mater. 50, 3425–3434 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00155-610.1016/S1359-6454(02)00155-6 ↗
40. A. Manickam, S. Dinesh, N.K. Narendran, K. Balamurugan, Influence of Co doping on combined photocatalytic and antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticles. Mater. Res. Express 3, 115009 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/3/11/11500910.1088/2053-1591/3/11/115009 ↗
41. T. Munawar, M.S. Nadeem, F. Mukhtar, S. Manzoor, M.N. Ashiq, S. Batool, M. Hasan, F. Iqbal, Enhanced photocatalytic, antibacterial, and electrochemical properties of CdO-based nanostructures by transition metals co-doping. Adv. Powder Technol. 33, 103451 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2022.10345110.1016/j.apt.2022.103451 ↗
42. S. Kumar, A.K. Ojha, B. Walkenfort, Cadmium oxide nanoparticles grown in situ on reduced graphene oxide for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye under ultraviolet irradiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 159, 111–119 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.03.02510.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.03.025 ↗
43. T.M. Khan, T. Shahid, M. Zakria, R.I. Shakoor, Optoelectronic properties and temperature dependent mechanisms of composite-hydroxide-mediated approach for the synthesis of CdO nanomaterials. Electron. Mater. Lett. 11, 366–373 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13391-015-4134-x10.1007/s13391-015-4134-x ↗
44. R.A. Zargar, Fabrication and improved response of ZnO-CdO composite films under different laser irradiation dose. Sci. Rep. 12, 10096 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13767-010.1038/s41598-022-13767-0 ↗
45. R. Prabhu, M. Khadar, Study of optical phonon modes of CdS nanoparticles using Raman spectroscopy. Bull. Mater. Sci. 31, 511–515 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-008-0080-710.1007/s12034-008-0080-7 ↗
46. N. Gautam, H. Gupta, A. Kapoor, F. Singh, Evolution of symmetry forbidden and silent Raman modes of cadmium doped zinc oxide films activated by swift heavy ion irradiation. Phys. B Condens. Matter. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2019.05.04310.1016/j.physb.2019.05.043 ↗
47. C.V. Reddy, B. Babu, J. Shim, Synthesis, optical properties and efficient photocatalytic activity of CdO/ZnO hybrid nanocomposite. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 112, 20–28 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2017.09.00310.1016/j.jpcs.2017.09.003 ↗
48. R. Leelavati, R. Kumar, Kumar, structural and optical studies of Mn2+ substituted CdO nano-particles. Appl. Phys. A. 127, 249 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-021-04390-310.1007/s00339-021-04390-3 ↗
49. F. Zhang, F.-L. Bei, J.-M. Cao, X. Wang, The preparation of CdO nanowires from solid-state transformation of a layered metal-organic framework. J. Solid State Chem. 181, 143–149 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2007.11.00410.1016/j.jssc.2007.11.004 ↗
50. Y. Liu, C. Yin, W. Wang, Y. Zhan, G. Wang, Synthesis of cadmium oxide nanowires by calcining precursors prepared in a novel inverse microemulsion. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 21, 137–139 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101429311485910.1023/A:1014293114859 ↗
51. P. Sasikumar, S. Nithiyanantham, Cd(OH) 2 and CdO: structural, optical, electron density distribution analysis with antibacterial assay. Eur. Phys. J. Plus (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02492-210.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02492-2 ↗
52. S. Aksoy, Y. Çağlar, S. Ilican, M. Caglar, Effect of heat treatment on physical properties of CdO films deposited by sol–gel method. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 34, 5191–5195 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.05710.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.057 ↗
53. H. Yang, G. Qiu, X. Zhang, A. Tang, W. Yang, Preparation of CdO nanoparticles by mechanochemical reaction. J. Nanopart. Res. 6, 539–542 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-004-3327-210.1007/s11051-004-3327-2 ↗
54. M. Feneberg, S. Osterburg, K. Lange, C. Lidig, B. Garke, R. Goldhahn, E. Richter, C. Netzel, M. Neumann, N. Esser, S. Fritze, H. Witte, J. Bläsing, A. Dadgar, A. Krost, Band gap renormalization and Burstein-Moss effect in silicon- and germanium-doped wurtzite GaN up to 10^20 cm-3. Phys. Rev. B. 90, 075203 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.07520310.1103/PhysRevB.90.075203 ↗
55. Y. Zhu, R. Mendelsberg, J. Zhu, J. Han, A. Anders, Dopant-induced band filling and bandgap renormalization in CdO: in films. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 46, 195102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/46/19/19510210.1088/0022-3727/46/19/195102 ↗
56. N. Manjula, A.R. Balu, K. Usharani, N. Raja, V.S. Nagarethinam, Enhancement in some physical properties of spray deposited CdO: Mn thin films through Zn doping towards optoelectronic applications. Optik 127, 6400–6406 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.04.12910.1016/j.ijleo.2016.04.129 ↗
57. B. Şahin, Y. Gülen, F. Bayansal, H.A. Çetinkara, H. Güder, Structural and optical properties of Ba-doped CdO films prepared by SILAR method. Superlattices Microstruct. 65, 56–63 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2013.10.03110.1016/j.spmi.2013.10.031 ↗
58. N. Thovhogi, E.-S. Park, M. Elayaperumal, M. Maaza, A. Gurib-Fakim, Physical properties of CdO nanoparticles synthesized by green chemistry via Hibiscus Sabdariffa flower extract. J. Alloys Compd. 655, 314–320 (2016)10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.063 ↗
59. P. Velusamy, R.R. Babu, K. Ramamurthi, E. Elangovan, J. Viegas, M.S. Dahlem, M. Arivanandhan, Characterization of spray pyrolytically deposited high mobility praseodymium doped CdO thin films. Ceram. Int. 42, 12675–12685 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.01710.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.017 ↗
60. P.L. Reddy, K. Deshmukh, K. Chidambaram, B. Ahamed, K. Kumar Sadasivuni, D. Ponnamma, R. Lakshmipathy, D. Dayananda, S.K.K. Pasha, Effect of poly ethylene glycol (PEG) on structural, thermal and photoluminescence properties of CdO nanoparticles for optoelectronic applications. Mater. Today Proc. 9, 175–183 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.02.15010.1016/j.matpr.2019.02.150 ↗
61. A. Murali, P.K. Sarswat, M.L. Free, Minimizing electron-hole pair recombination through band-gap engineering in novel ZnO–CeO2–rGO ternary nanocomposite for photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic applications. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27, 25042–25056 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08990-z10.1007/s11356-020-08990-z ↗
62. C. Dantus, R.S. Rusu, G.I. Rusu, On the mechanism of electronic transport in polycrystalline CdO thin films. Superlattices Microstruct. 50, 303–310 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2011.07.00810.1016/j.spmi.2011.07.008 ↗
63. M.R. Alam, M.M. Rahman, A.M.M. Tanveer Karim, M.K.R. Khan, Effect of Ag incorporation on structural and opto-electric properties of pyrolized CdO thin films. Int Nano Lett. 8, 287–295 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40089-018-0251-510.1007/s40089-018-0251-5 ↗
64. K. Khan, M.A. Rahman, M.K.R. Khan, Effect of annealing temperature on structural, electrical and optical properties of spray pyrolytic nanocrystalline CdO thin films. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 24, 26–33 (2014)10.1016/j.mssp.2014.03.002 ↗
65. M. Islam, M. Islam, J. Podder, Optical and electrical characteristics of Cdo thin films deposited by spray pyrolysis method. J. Bangladesh Acad. Sci. (2009). https://doi.org/10.3329/jbas.v32i1.244710.3329/jbas.v32i1.2447 ↗
66. R. Chandiramouli, B.G. Jeyaprakash, Review of CdO thin films. Solid State Sci. 16, 102–110 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2012.10.01710.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2012.10.017 ↗
67. K. Badreddine, I. Kazah, M. Rekaby, R. Awad, Structural, morphological, optical, and room temperature magnetic characterization on pure and Sm-doped ZnO nanoparticles. J. Nanomater. 2018, e7096195 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/709619510.1155/2018/7096195 ↗
68. J. Al Boukhari, A. Khalaf, R.S. Hassan, R. Awad, Structural, optical and magnetic properties of pure and rare earth-doped NiO nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. A 126, 323 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-03508-310.1007/s00339-020-03508-3 ↗
69. A.M. Abdallah, R. Awad, Sm and Er partial alternatives of Co in Co3O4 nanoparticles: probing the physical properties. Phys. B Condens. Matter. 608, 412898 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2021.41289810.1016/j.physb.2021.412898 ↗
70. A. Khalaf, M. Matar, W. Abdeen, Tunable band gap and antiferromagnetic ordering in Co-doped CdO nanostructures. J. Superconduct. Nov. Magn. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-021-05973-010.1007/s10948-021-05973-0 ↗
71. W.Z. Tawfik, M. Esmat, S.I. El-Dek, Drastic improvement in magnetization of CdO nanoparticles by Fe doping. Appl. Nanosci. 7, 863–870 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-017-0623-610.1007/s13204-017-0623-6 ↗
72. K. Karthik, S. Dhanuskodi, C. Gobinath, S. Prabukumar, S. Sivaramakrishnan, Multifunctional properties of CdO nanostructures synthesised through microwave assisted hydrothermal method. Mater. Res. Innov. 23, 310–318 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/14328917.2018.147544310.1080/14328917.2018.1475443 ↗
73. H. Yang, C. Liu, D. Yang, H. Zhang, Z. Xi, Comparative study of cytotoxicity, oxidative stress and genotoxicity induced by four typical nanomaterials: the role of particle size, shape and composition. J. Appl. Toxicol. 29, 69–78 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.138510.1002/jat.1385 ↗
74. J.Y. Cheon, S.J. Kim, Y.H. Rhee, O.H. Kwon, W.H. Park, Shape-dependent antimicrobial activities of silver nanoparticles. Int. J. Nanomed. 14, 2773–2780 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S19647210.2147/IJN.S196472 ↗
75. O. Yamamoto, Influence of particle size on the antibacterial activity of zinc oxide. Int. J. Inorg. Mater. 3, 643–646 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1466-6049(01)00197-010.1016/S1466-6049(01)00197-0 ↗
76. L. Zhang, Y. Jiang, Y. Ding, M. Povey, D. York, Investigation into the antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO nanofluids). J. Nanopart. Res. 9, 479–489 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-006-9150-110.1007/s11051-006-9150-1 ↗
77. G. Somasundaram, J. Rajan, P. Sangaiya, R. Dilip, Hydrothermal synthesis of CdO nanoparticles for photocatalytic and antimicrobial activities. Results Mater. 4, 100044 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinma.2019.10004410.1016/j.rinma.2019.100044 ↗
78. L. Zhang, Y. Ding, M. Povey, D. York, ZnO nanofluids—a potential antibacterial agent. Prog. Nat. Sci. 18, 939–944 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.01.02610.1016/j.pnsc.2008.01.026 ↗
79. I. Sondi, B. Salopek-Sondi, Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 275, 177–182 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.01210.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.012 ↗
80. S. Sharmin, M.M. Rahaman, C. Sarkar, O. Atolani, M.T. Islam, O.S. Adeyemi, Nanoparticles as antimicrobial and antiviral agents: a literature-based perspective study. Heliyon 7, e06456 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e0645610.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06456 ↗
81. A. Ivask, A. Elbadawy, C. Kaweeteerawat, D. Boren, H. Fischer, Z. Ji, C.H. Chang, R. Liu, T. Tolaymat, D. Telesca, J.I. Zink, Y. Cohen, P.A. Holden, H.A. Godwin, Toxicity mechanisms in Escherichia coli vary for silver nanoparticles and differ from ionic silver. ACS Nano 8, 374–386 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn404404710.1021/nn4044047 ↗
82. A. Abbaszadegan, Y. Ghahramani, A. Gholami, B. Hemmateenejad, S. Dorostkar, M. Nabavizadeh, H. Sharghi, The effect of charge at the surface of silver nanoparticles on antimicrobial activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria: a preliminary study. J. Nanomater. 2015, e720654 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/72065410.1155/2015/720654 ↗
83. R. Brayner, R. Ferrari-Iliou, N. Brivois, S. Djediat, M.F. Benedetti, F. Fiévet, Toxicological impact studies based on Escherichia coli bacteria in ultrafine ZnO nanoparticles colloidal medium. Nano Lett. 6, 866–870 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl052326h10.1021/nl052326h ↗
84. V.L. Prasanna, R. Vijayaraghavan, Insight into the mechanism of antibacterial activity of ZnO: surface defects mediated reactive oxygen species even in the dark. Langmuir 31, 9155–9162 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0226610.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02266 ↗
85. L. Wang, H. He, Y. Yu, L. Sun, S. Liu, C. Zhang, L. He, Morphology-dependent bactericidal activities of Ag/CeO2 catalysts against Escherichia coli. J. Inorg. Biochem. 135, 45–53 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2014.02.01610.1016/j.jinorgbio.2014.02.016 ↗
86. S. Pal, Y.K. Tak, J.M. Song, Does the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles depend on the shape of the nanoparticle? A study of the Gram-Negative Bacterium Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 1712–1720 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02218-0610.1128/AEM.02218-06 ↗
87. X. Hong, J. Wen, X. Xiong, Y. Hu, Shape effect on the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized via a microwave-assisted method. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 4489–4497 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5668-z10.1007/s11356-015-5668-z ↗
88. P.T. Huynh, G.D. Nguyen, K.T.L. Tran, T.M. Ho, B.T. Duong, V.Q. Lam, T.V.K. Ngo, One-Pot, surfactant-free synthesis of gold nanostars and evaluation of their antibacterial effects against Propionibacterium acnes. J. Nanomater. 2021, e6650661 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/665066110.1155/2021/6650661 ↗
89. O. Akhavan, E. Ghaderi, A. Esfandiar, Wrapping bacteria by graphene nanosheets for isolation from environment, reactivation by sonication, and inactivation by near-infrared irradiation. J. Phys. Chem. B. 115, 6279–6288 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp200686k10.1021/jp200686k ↗
90. M.J. Hajipour, A.A. Saei, E.D. Walker, B. Conley, Y. Omidi, K. Lee, M. Mahmoudi, Nanotechnology for targeted detection and removal of bacteria: opportunities and challenges. Adv. Sci. (Weinh). 8, 2100556 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20210055610.1002/advs.202100556 ↗
91. A. Kumar, A.K. Pandey, S.S. Singh, R. Shanker, A. Dhawan, Engineered ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles induce oxidative stress and DNA damage leading to reduced viability of Escherichia coli. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 51, 1872–1881 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.08.02510.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.08.025 ↗
92. Y. Li, W. Zhang, J. Niu, Y. Chen, Mechanism of photogenerated reactive oxygen species and correlation with the antibacterial properties of engineered metal-oxide nanoparticles. ACS Nano 6, 5164–5173 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn300934k10.1021/nn300934k ↗
93. Z. Peng, J. Ni, K. Zheng, Y. Shen, X. Wang, G. He, S. Jin, T. Tang, Dual effects and mechanism of TiO2 nanotube arrays in reducing bacterial colonization and enhancing C3H10T1/2 cell adhesion. Int. J. Nanomed. 8, 3093–3105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S4808410.2147/IJN.S48084 ↗
94. M. Jannesari, O. Akhavan, H.R. Madaah Hosseini, B. Bakhshi, Graphene/CuO2 nanoshuttles with controllable release of oxygen nanobubbles promoting interruption of bacterial respiration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 35813–35825 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c0573210.1021/acsami.0c05732 ↗
95. K. Karthik, S. Dhanuskodi, C. Gobinath, S. Prabukumar, S. Sivaramakrishnan, Photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of hydrothermally prepared CdO nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 28, 11420–11429 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-6937-z10.1007/s10854-017-6937-z ↗
96. A.M. Holban, E. Andronescu, V. Grumezescu, A.E. Oprea, A.M. Grumezescu, G. Socol, M.C. Chifiriuc, V. Lazar, F. Iordache, Carvone functionalized iron oxide nanostructures thin films prepared by MAPLE for improved resistance to microbial colonization. J. Sol. Gel Sci. Technol. 73, 605–611 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-014-3552-910.1007/s10971-014-3552-9 ↗
97. G. Sharma, Pterocarpus marsupium derived phyto-synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles and their antimicrobial activities. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. (2015). https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.100019510.4172/1948-5948.1000195 ↗
98. U.R. Gudla, B. Suryanarayana, V. Raghavendra, D. Parajuli, N. Murali, S. Dominic, Y. Ramakrishna, K. Chandramouli, Structural, optical and luminescence properties of pure, Fe-doped and glucose-capped CdO semiconductor nanoparticles for their antibacterial activity. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 32, 3920–3928 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-05135-310.1007/s10854-020-05135-3 ↗
99. K. Karthik, S. Dhanuskodi, C. Gobinath, S. Prabukumar, S. Sivaramakrishnan, Andrographis paniculata extract mediated green synthesis of CdO nanoparticles and its electrochemical and antibacterial studies. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 28, 7991–8001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-6503-810.1007/s10854-017-6503-8 ↗
100. B. Salehi, E. Mortaz, P. Tabarsi, Comparison of antibacterial activities of cadmium oxide nanoparticles against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. Adv. Biomed. Res. 4, 105 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.15780510.4103/2277-9175.157805 ↗