journal article·2021-07Open access

Nanopore creation in MoS2 and graphene monolayers by nanoparticles impact: a reactive molecular dynamics study

Hamidreza Noori, Bohayra Mortazavi, Leila Keshtkari, Xiaoying Zhuang, Timon Rabczuk

Applied Physics A· Volume 127· Issue 7

Abstract

Abstract In this work, extensive reactive molecular dynamics simulations are conducted to analyze the nanopore creation by nanoparticles impact over single-layer molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) with 1T and 2H phases. We also compare the results with graphene monolayer. In our simulations, nanosheets are exposed to a spherical rigid carbon projectile with high initial velocities ranging from 2 to 23 km/s. Results for three different structures are compared to examine the most critical factors in the perforation and resistance force during the impact. To analyze the perforation and impact resistance, kinetic energy and displacement time history of the projectile as well as perforation resistance force of the projectile are investigated. Interestingly, although the elasticity module and tensile strength of the graphene are by almost five times higher than those of MoS2, the results demonstrate that 1T and 2H-MoS2 phases are more resistive to the impact loading and perforation than graphene. For the MoS2nanosheets, we realize that the 2H phase is more resistant to impact loading than the 1T counterpart. Our reactive molecular dynamics results highlight that in addition to the strength and toughness, atomic structure is another crucial factor that can contribute substantially to impact resistance of 2D materials. The obtained results can be useful to guide the experimental setups for the nanopore creation in MoS2or other 2D lattices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. W. Li, Y. Yang, J.K. Weber, G. Zhang, R. Zhou, Tunable, strain-controlled nanoporous MoS2 filter for water desalination. ACS Nano 10, 1829–1835 (2016)10.1021/acsnano.5b05250 ↗
2. K. Rasool et al., Water treatment and environmental remediation applications of two-dimensional metal carbides (MXenes). Mater. Today 30, 80–102 (2019)10.1016/j.mattod.2019.05.017 ↗
3. J.H. Kim, J.H. Jeong, N. Kim, R. Joshi, G.-H. Lee, Mechanical properties of two-dimensional materials and their applications. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 52, 83001 (2018)10.1088/1361-6463/aaf465 ↗
4. X. Gu, Y. Wei, X. Yin, B. Li, R. Yang, Colloquium: phononic thermal properties of two-dimensional materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 41002 (2018)10.1103/RevModPhys.90.041002 ↗
5. M. Salavati, Electronic and mechanical responses of two-dimensional HfS2, HfSe2, ZrS2, and ZrSe2 from first-principles. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-018-0491-510.1007/s11709-018-0491-5 ↗
6. Y. Fu et al., Graphene related materials for thermal management. 2D Mater. 7, 12001 (2019)10.1088/2053-1583/ab48d9 ↗
7. V. Berry, Impermeability of graphene and its applications. Carbon N. Y. 62, 1–10 (2013)10.1016/j.carbon.2013.05.052 ↗
8. J.S. Bunch et al., Impermeable atomic membranes from graphene sheets. Nano Lett. 8, 2458–2462 (2008)10.1021/nl801457b ↗
9. Y. Li et al., Additive manufacturing high performance graphene-based composites: a review. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 124, 105483 (2019)10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105483 ↗
10. D. Schmeltzer, A. Saxena, Superconductivity in graphene induced by the rotated layer. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32, 475603 (2020)10.1088/1361-648X/aba0da ↗
11. B. Yuan et al., Electrical conductive and graphitizable polymer nanofibers grafted on graphene nanosheets: Improving electrical conductivity and flame retardancy of polypropylene. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 84, 76–86 (2016)10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.003 ↗
12. Haque, B. Z. (Gama), Chowdhury, S. C. & Gillespie, J. W. Molecular simulations of stress wave propagation and perforation of graphene sheets under transverse impact. Carbon N. Y. 102, 126–140 (2016).10.1016/j.carbon.2016.02.033 ↗
13. M. Salavati, N. Alajlan, T. Rabczuk, Super-stretchability in two-dimensional RuCl3 and RuBr 3 confirmed by first-principles simulations. Phys. E Low-Dimensional Syst. Nanostruct. 113, 79–85 (2019)10.1016/j.physe.2019.05.011 ↗
14. S. Sadeghzadeh, Benchmarking the penetration-resistance efficiency of multilayer graphene sheets due to spacing the graphene layers. Appl. Phys. A 122, 655 (2016)10.1007/s00339-016-0186-5 ↗
15. S. Sadeghzadeh, Computational design of graphene sheets for withstanding the impact of ultrafast projectiles. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 70, 196–211 (2016)10.1016/j.jmgm.2016.10.001 ↗
16. S. Sadeghzadeh, Geometric effects on nanopore creation in graphene and on the impact-withstanding efficiency of graphene nanosheets. Mech. Adv. Compos. Struct. 5, 91–102 (2018)
17. S. Sadeghzadeh, L. Liu, Resistance and rupture analysis of single- and few-layer graphene nanosheets impacted by various projectiles. Superlattices Microstruct. 97, 617–629 (2016)10.1016/j.spmi.2016.07.005 ↗
18. C. Donnet, A. Erdemir, Historical developments and new trends in tribological and solid lubricant coatings. Surf. Coatings Technol. 180–181, 76–84 (2004)10.1016/j.surfcoat.2003.10.022 ↗
19. C. Donnet, J.M. Martin, T. Le Mogne, M. Belin, Super-low friction of MoS2 coatings in various environments. Tribol. Int. 29, 123–128 (1996)10.1016/0301-679X(95)00094-K ↗
20. G.S. Papanai, I. Sharma, G. Kedawat, B.K. Gupta, Qualitative analysis of mechanically exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets using spectroscopic probes. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 27264–27271 (2019)10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b09191 ↗
21. A. Castellanos-Gomez et al., Laser-thinning of MoS2: on demand generation of a single-layer semiconductor. Nano Lett. 12, 3187–3192 (2012)10.1021/nl301164v ↗
22. M. Salavati, A. Mojahedin, A.H.N. Shirazi, Mechanical responses of pristine and defective hexagonal boron-nitride nanosheets: a molecular dynamics investigation. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 14, 623–631 (2020)10.1007/s11709-020-0616-5 ↗
23. M. Tabatabaeichehr, H. Mortazavi, The effectiveness of aromatherapy in the management of labor pain and anxiety. Ethiop. J. Health Sci. 30, 449–458 (2020)
24. F. Rahimi Mehr, M. Salavati, A. Morgenthal, S. Kamrani, C. Fleck, Computational analysis and experimental calibration of cold isostatic compaction of Mg-SiC nanocomposite powders. Mater. Today Commun. 27, 102321 (2021)10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102321 ↗
25. S. Bertolazzi, J. Brivio, A. Kis, Stretching and breaking of ultrathin MoS2. ACS Nano 5, 9703–9709 (2011)10.1021/nn203879f ↗
26. H.R. Noori, E. Jomehzadeh, N. Alajlan, T. Rabczuk, Elastic deformation behavior of freestanding MoS2 films using a continuum approach. Solid State Commun. 280, 24–31 (2018)10.1016/j.ssc.2018.05.014 ↗
27. B. Mortazavi, A. Ostadhossein, T. Rabczuk, A.C.T. van Duin, Mechanical response of all-MoS2 single-layer heterostructures: a ReaxFF investigation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 23695–23701 (2016)10.1039/C6CP03612K ↗
28. B.A. Gama et al., High strain-rate behavior of plain-weave S-2 glass/vinyl ester composites. J. Compos. Mater. 35, 1201–1228 (2001)10.1177/002199801772662299 ↗
29. J.W. Gillespie Jr., A.M. Monib, L.A. Carlsson, Damage tolerance of thick-section S-2 glass fabric composites subjected to ballistic impact loading. J. Compos. Mater. 37, 2131–2147 (2003)10.1177/002199803036243 ↗
30. T. El Sayed, W. Mock, A. Mota, F. Fraternali, M. Ortiz, Computational assessment of ballistic impact on a high strength structural steel/polyurea composite plate. Comput. Mech. 43, 525–534 (2009)10.1007/s00466-008-0327-6 ↗
31. M.A. Abdol, S. Sadeghzadeh, M. Jalaly, M.M. Khatibi, Constructing a three-dimensional graphene structure via bonding layers by ion beam irradiation. Sci. Rep. 9, 8127 (2019)10.1038/s41598-019-44697-z ↗
32. J.-H. Lee, P.E. Loya, J. Lou, E.L. Thomas, Dynamic mechanical behavior of multilayer graphene via supersonic projectile penetration. Science (80-) 346, 1092LP – 1096 (2014)10.1126/science.1258544 ↗
33. A.F. Ávila, A.S. Neto, H. Nascimento Junior, Hybrid nanocomposites for mid-range ballistic protection. Int. J. Impact Eng. 38, 669–676 (2011)10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.03.002 ↗
34. Cooper, R. et al. Nonlinear elastic behavior of two-dimensional molybdenum disulfide. Phys. Rev. B 87 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.87.035423 ↗
35. C. Lee, X. Wei, J.W. Kysar, J. Hone, Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science (80-) 321, 385LP – 388 (2008)10.1126/science.1157996 ↗
36. Liang, T., Phillpot, S. R. & Sinnott, S. B. Parametrization of a reactive many-body potential for Mo-S systems. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 79 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevB.79.245110 ↗
37. D.W. Brenner et al., A second-generation reactive empirical bond order (REBO) potential energy expression for hydrocarbons. J. Phys. Condens. Matter (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/14/4/31210.1088/0953-8984/14/4/312 ↗
38. J.A. Stewart, D.E. Spearot, Atomistic simulations of nanoindentation on the basal plane of crystalline molybdenum disulfide (MoS2). Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 21, 45003 (2013)10.1088/0965-0393/21/4/045003 ↗
39. N. Wakabayashi, H.G. Smith, R.M. Nicklow, Lattice dynamics of hexagonal MoS2 studied by neutron scattering. Phys. Rev. B 12, 659–663 (1975)10.1103/PhysRevB.12.659 ↗
40. E. Cadelano, P. Palla, S. Giordano, L. Colombo, Nonlinear elasticity of monolayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 235502 (2009)10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.235502 ↗
41. J.-S. Wang, B.K. Agarwalla, H. Li, J. Thingna, Nonequilibrium Green’s function method for quantum thermal transport. Front. Phys. 9, 673–697 (2014)10.1007/s11467-013-0340-x ↗
42. T. Eknapakul et al., Electronic structure of a quasi-freestanding MoS2 monolayer. Nano Lett. 14, 1312–1316 (2014)10.1021/nl4042824 ↗
43. X. Zhang et al., Raman spectroscopy of shear and layer breathing modes in multilayer MoS2. Phys. Rev. B 87, 115413 (2013)10.1103/PhysRevB.87.115413 ↗
44. R. Chen, J. Luo, D. Guo, X. Lu, Energy transfer under impact load studied by molecular dynamics simulation. J. Nanoparticle Res. 11, 589–600 (2009)10.1007/s11051-008-9398-8 ↗
45. M. Henkel, H.M. Urbassek, Ta cluster bombardment of graphite: molecular dynamics study of penetration and damage. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 145, 503–508 (1998)10.1016/S0168-583X(98)00619-3 ↗
46. S. Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995)10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
47. A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the open visualization tool. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2009)10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
48. A. Ostadhossein et al., ReaxFF reactive force-field study of molybdenum disulfide (MoS2). J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 631–640 (2017)10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02902 ↗