journal article·2009-08

Quantitative Lorentz transmission electron microscopy of structured thin permalloy films

S. A. Nepijko, G. Schönhense

Applied Physics A· Volume 96· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The defocusing of images of ferromagnetic particles in the transmission electron microscope gives rise to magnetic contrast (Lorentz microscopy). We have developed a theory which allows from this contrast to determine quantitatively the distribution of the magnetic fields of the specimen. The measurements were performed on permalloy particles of disc (diameter 50 nm), and rectangular (25×50 nm2 and 50×50 nm2) shapes, thickness of 21 nm. These particles had a vortex and Landau–Lifshitz structure, respectively. The determined value of the magnetic induction in the material amounted to 1.1±0.1 T. The stray fields in angular sectors of the rectangular particles reached 0.35±0.05 T. The width of the 90° Neel wall between domains turned out to be equal to 4.5±0.5 nm.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Magnetic properties of thin films · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. A.K. Petford-Long, J.N. Chapman, Lorentz Microscopy, in Magnetic Microscopy of Nanostructures, ed. by H. Hopster, H.P. Oepen (Springer, Berlin, 2005), pp. 67–8610.1007/3-540-26641-0_4 ↗
2. T. Arii, S. Yatsuya, N. Wada, K. Mihama, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 17, 259 (1978)10.1143/JJAP.17.259 ↗
3. J.N. Chapman, J. Phys. D 17, 623 (1984)10.1088/0022-3727/17/4/003 ↗
4. R. Ploessl, J.N. Chapman, A.M. Thompson, J. Zweck, H. Hoffmann, J. Appl. Phys. 73, 2447 (1993)10.1063/1.353102 ↗
5. J. Raabe, R. Pulwey, R. Sattler, T. Schweinböck, J. Zweck, D. Weiss, J. Appl. Phys. 88, 4437 (2000)10.1063/1.1289216 ↗
6. T. Haug, A. Vogl, J. Zweck, C.H. Back, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 082506 (2006)10.1063/1.2179367 ↗
7. J.W.M. Jacobs, J.F.C.M. Verhoeven, J. Microsc. 143, 103 (1986)10.1111/j.1365-2818.1986.tb02768.x ↗
8. J.N. Chapman, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 3, 355 (1989)10.1016/0921-5107(89)90140-2 ↗
9. L. Reimer, Transmission Electron Microscopy (Springer, New York, 1997)10.1007/978-3-662-14824-2 ↗
10. http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/MU-Metall
11. F.B. Humphrey, M. Redjdal, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 201, 1771 (2004)10.1002/pssa.200304541 ↗
12. T. Trunk, M. Redjdal, A. Kakay, M.F. Ruane, F.B. Humphrey, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 7606 (2001)10.1063/1.1355357 ↗
13. F.B. Humphrey, M. Redjdal, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 133, 11 (1994)10.1016/0304-8853(94)90476-6 ↗
14. A. Krasyuk, S.A. Nepijko, A. Oelsner, C.M. Schneider, H.J. Elmers, G. Schönhense, Appl. Phys. A 88, 793 (2007)10.1007/s00339-007-4085-7 ↗
15. C.M. Schneider, A. Kuksov, A. Krasyuk, A. Oelsner, D. Neeb, S.A. Nepijko, G. Schönhense, I. Mönch, R. Kaltofen, J. Morais, C. de Nadai, N.B. Brookes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 2562 (2004)10.1063/1.1790606 ↗