Enhancement magnetoelectric effect in Metglas-Fe by annealing
Source abstract
Abstract
An optimal annealing condition (360 °C, 10 min) was found for the FeBSiC Metglas, at which the Metglas transformed into a mix phase structure between amorphous and crystalline. It gives a deformation of single-layer FeBSiC Metglas ribbon increases from 26.9 ppm of the unannealed sample to 34.6 ppm, piezomagnetic coefficient d33,m from 1.9 to 2.6 ppm/Oe, and the loss decreases from 0.18 to 0.07%. After the mix phase Metglas and Mn-doped 0.71Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-0.29PbTiO3 (Mn-doped PMN-PT) single crystal were fabricated into a magnetoelectric (ME) laminate composite, it is found that αQ at quasi-static and resonance frequency rises from 2183 to 2640 pC/Oe, and from 120,000 to 165,000 pC/Oe, with the increase amplitude of 21% and 37.5%, respectively. From test of realistic noise, the equivalent noise magnetic field (EMN) @1 Hz of the ME sensor made by mix phase Metglas declines from 20.2 to 15.4 pT/Hz1/2, and EMN@30 Hz from 1.46 to 1.23 pT/Hz1/2. The reinforcement of the piezomagnetic performance is attributed to the generation of mix phase structure. It can enhance ME coupling performance at quasi-static and resonance state, reduce loss, and boost the sensitivity of the ME sensor.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multiferroics and related materials · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. C. Nan, M.I. Bichurin, S. Dong, D. Viehland, G. Srinivasan, Multiferroic magnetoelectric composites: historical perspective, status, and future directions. J. Appl. Phys. 103, 031101 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.283641010.1063/1.2836410 ↗
2. A. Baschirotto, E. Dallago, P. Malcovati, A fluxgate magnetic sensor: from PCB to micro-integrated technology. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 56, 25–31 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2006.88721810.1109/TIM.2006.887218 ↗
3. S. Tanaka, T. Akai, Y. Hatsukade, T. Ohtani, Y. Ikeda, S. Suzuki, K. Tanabe, High Tc SQUID detection system for metallic contaminant in lithium ion battery. IEEE Trans. Magn. 45, 4510–4513 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2009.202185710.1109/TMAG.2009.2021857 ↗
4. T.R. Clem, Progress in magnetic sensor technology for sea mine detection. Proc. Spie. 3079, 354–371 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.28086210.1117/12.280862 ↗
5. G. Garvey, W. Gerace, R. Jaffe, I. Talmi, I. Kelson, Set of nuclear-mass relations and a resultant mass table. Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, S1–S80 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.41.S110.1103/RevModPhys.41.S1 ↗
6. R. Newnham, D. Skinner, L. Cross, Connectivity and piezoelectric-pyroelectric composites. Mater. Res. Bull. 13, 525–536 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5408(78)90161-710.1016/0025-5408(78)90161-7 ↗
7. Y. Jia, F. Wang, X. Zhao, H. Luo, S.W. Or, H. Lai, W. Chan, Converse magnetoelectric effects in piezoelectric-piezomagnetic layered composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 1440–1444 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.04610.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.046 ↗
8. J. Ma, J. Jiao, C. Fang, X. Zhao, H. Luo, High sensitive nonlinear modulation magnetoelectric magnetic sensors with a magnetostrictive metglas structure based on bell-shaped geometry. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 405, 225–230 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.12.07310.1016/j.jmmm.2015.12.073 ↗
9. C. Fang, J. Jiao, J. Ma, D. Lin, X. Zhao, Haosu Luo, Ultrahigh magnetoelectric voltage coefficients in laminates of Metglas and length-polarized ternary 0.35Pb(In1/2Nb1/2)O3–0.35Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–0.3PbTiO3 single crystals. Sens. Actuators, A. 233, 202–206 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2015.07.00610.1016/j.sna.2015.07.006 ↗
10. Z. Yin, H. Luo, P. Wang, G. Xu, Growth characterization and properties of relaxor ferroelectric PMN-PT single crystals. Ferroelectrics 229, 207–216 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/0015019990822434110.1080/00150199908224341 ↗
11. Y. Wang, D. Hasanyan, M. Li, J. Gao, J. Li, D. Viehland, Haosu Luo, Theoretical model for geometry-dependent magnetoelectric effect in magnetostrictive/piezoelectric composites. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 124513 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.472983210.1063/1.4729832 ↗
12. S. Dong, J. Zhai, J. Li, D. Viehland, Near-ideal magnetoelectricity in high-permeability magnetostrictive/piezofiber laminates with a (2–1) connectivity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 252904 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.242077210.1063/1.2420772 ↗
13. J. Zhai, S. Dong, Z. Xing, J. Li, D. Viehland, Giant magnetoelectric effect in Metglas/polyvinylidene-fluoride laminates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 083507 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.233799610.1063/1.2337996 ↗
14. Y. Wang, D. Gray, D. Berry, J. Gao, M. Li, J. Li, D. Viehland, An extremely low equivalent magnetic noise magnetoelectric sensor. Adv. Mater. 23, 4111–4114 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20110077310.1002/adma.201100773 ↗
15. C. Fang, J. Jiao, J. Ma, D. Lin, H. Xu, X. Zhao, H. Luo, Significant reduction of equivalent magnetic noise by in-plane series connection in magnetoelectric Metglas/Mn-doped Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3 laminate composites. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48, 465002 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/48/46/46500210.1088/0022-3727/48/46/465002 ↗
16. J. Ma, J. Jiao, C. Fang, H. Deng, S. Wang, D. Lin, H. Xu, X. Zhao, H. Luo, Improvement of magnetoelectric properties in metglas/ Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3/metglas laminates with screen-printed ID-electrodes by poling optimization. J. Alloys Compd. 656, 793–797 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.10.05010.1016/j.jallcom.2015.10.050 ↗
17. Z. Chu, H. Shi, W. Shi, G. Liu, J. Wu, J. Yang, S. Dong, Enhanced resonance magnetoelectric coupling in (1–1) connectivity composites. Adv. Mater. 29, 1606022 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20160602210.1002/adma.201606022 ↗
18. M. Pourhosseiniasl, X. Gao, S. Kamalisiahroudi, Z. Yu, Z. Chu, J. Yang, H. Lee, S. Dong, Versatile power and energy conversion of magnetoelectric composite materials with high efficiency via electromechanical resonance. Nano Energy 70, 104506 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10450610.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104506 ↗
19. H. Vogel, M. Von Heimendahl, The effect of pre-annealing on the subsequent crystallization in the metallic glasses Fe-Ni-P-B and Fe-Ni-Cr-P-B using transmission electron microscopy. Mater. Sci. Eng. 57, 171–179 (1983)10.1016/0025-5416(83)90207-0 ↗
20. P.T. Squire, M.R.J. Gibbs, Effect in obliquely field annealed Metglas2605SC. IEEE Trans. Magn. 25, 3614–3616 (1989)10.1109/20.42611 ↗
21. Y. Yang, J. Gao, Z. Wang, M. Li, J. Li, J. Das, D. Viehland, Effect of heat treatment on the properties of Metglas foils, and laminated magnetoelectric composites made thereof. Mater. Res. Bull. 46, 266–270 (2011)10.1016/j.materresbull.2010.10.015 ↗
22. E. Freeman, J. Harpe, N. Goel, I. Gilbert, J. Unguris, S.J. Schiff, S. Tadigadapa, Improving the magnetoelectric performance of Metglas/PZT laminates by annealing in a magnetic field. Smart Mater. Struct. 26, 085038 (2017)10.1088/1361-665X/aa770b ↗
23. H. Fujimori, H. Yoshimoto, T. Masumoto, T. Mitera, Anomalous eddy current loss and amorphous magnetic materials with low core loss. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 1893 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.32956310.1063/1.329563 ↗
24. H. Fiedler, J. Leveneur, D.R.G. Mitchell, S. Arulkumaran, G.I. Ng, A. Alphones, J. Kennedy, Enhancing the piezoelectric modulus of wurtzite AlN by ion beam strain engineering. Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 012108 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.003104710.1063/5.0031047 ↗
25. H. Fiedler, F. Fuchs, J. Leveneur, M. Nancarrow, D.R.G. Mitchell, J. Schuster, J. Kennedy, Giant piezoelectricity of deformed aluminum nitride stabilized through noble gas interstitials for energy efficient resonators. Adv. Electron. Mater. 7, 2100358 (2021)10.1002/aelm.202100358 ↗
26. S. Katakam, J.Y. Hwang, H. Vora, S.P. Harimkar, R. Banerjeeb, N.B. Dahotrea, Laser-induced thermal and spatial nanocrystallization of amorphous Fe-Si-B alloy. Scr. Mater. 66, 538–541 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.12.02810.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.12.028 ↗
27. A.L. Patterson, The scherrer formula for X-ray particle size determination. Phys. Rev 56, 978–982 (1939). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.56.97810.1103/PhysRev.56.978 ↗
28. Z.C. Cordero, B.E. Knight, C.A. Schuh, Six decades of the Hall-Petch effect a survey of grain-size strengthening studies on pure metals. Int. Mater. Rev. 61, 495–512 (2016)10.1080/09506608.2016.1191808 ↗
29. C.E. Carlton, P.J. Ferreira, What is behind the inverse Hall-Petch effect in nanocrystalline materials. Acta Mater. 55, 3749–3756 (2007)10.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.021 ↗
30. A.A. Nazarov, On the pile-up model of the grain size-yield stress relation for nanocrystals. Scr. Mater. 34, 697–701 (1996)10.1016/1359-6462(95)00572-2 ↗
31. S. Katakam, S. Santhanakrishnan, H. Vora, J.Y. Hwang, R. Banerjee, N.B. Dahotre, Stress-induced selective nanocrystallization in laser-processed amorphous Fe-Si-B alloys. Philos. Mag. Lett. 92, 617–624 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500839.2012.70441610.1080/09500839.2012.704416 ↗
32. H. Fujimori, H. Yoshimoto, T. Masumoto, T. Mitera, Anomalous eddy current loss and amorphous magnetic materials with low core loss. J. Appl. Phys. 52(3), 1893–1898 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.32956310.1063/1.329563 ↗
33. Yoshihisa OBI, (1976) Hiroyasu FuIMoRI, Hideo SAIToMagnetic, Domain Structure of an Amorphous Fe-P-C Alloy, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 15 15611. http://iopscience.iop.org/1347-4065/15/4/61110.1143/JJAP.15.611 ↗
34. A. Datta, D. Nathasingh, R.J. Martis, P.J. Flanders, C.D. Graham, Saturation and engineering magnetostriction of an iron-base amorphous alloy for power applications. J. Appl. Phys. 55, 1784–1786 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.33347710.1063/1.333477 ↗
35. T. Deng, B. Fang, R. Zhu, J. Chen, H. Luo, Dynamic scaling hysteresis behavior and field-induced domain transition of 0.16PIN-0.62PMN-0.22 PT single crystals. Curr. Appl. Phys. 21, 64–71 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2020.10.01110.1016/j.cap.2020.10.011 ↗
36. J. Ma, C. Xin, J. Ma, Q. Zhang, C. Nan, Self-biased magnetoelectric effect in (Pb, Zr)TiO3/metglaslaminates by annealing method. Sci. Bull. 61, 378–382 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-016-1002-510.1007/s11434-016-1002-5 ↗
37. S. Dong, J. Zhai, Equivalent circuit method for static and dynamic analysis of magnetoelectric laminated composites. Chin. Sci. Bull. 53, 2113–2123 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0304-710.1007/s11434-008-0304-7 ↗
38. S. Dong, J. Li, D. Viehland, Longitudinal and transverse magnetoelectric voltage coefficients of magnetostrictive/piezoelectric laminate composite: experiments. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 51, 794–799 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2003.124474110.1109/TUFFC.2003.1244741 ↗
39. J. Jiao, L. Li, B. Ren, H. Guo, H. Deng, W. Di, X. Zhao, W. Jing, Haosu Luo, Parallel multilayer magnetoelectric composite based on (1–x)Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)-xPbTiO3 and Terfenol-D coupled with charge mode amplifier. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 043909 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.368181810.1063/1.3681818 ↗
40. M.I. Bichurin, V.M. Petrov, G. Srinivasan, Theory of low-frequency magnetoelectric coupling in magnetostrictive-piezoelectric bilayers. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter. 68(23), 054402 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.05440210.1103/PhysRevB.68.054402 ↗
41. J. Jiao, W. Wang, L. Li, Y. Liu, B. Ren, H. Deng, J. Chen, C. Xu, W. Di, X. Zhao, H. Luo, W. Jing, An improved magnetic field detection unit based on length-magnetized Terfenol-D and width-polarized ternary 035Pb(In1/2Nb1/2)O3–035Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–030PbTiO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 232906 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.476990410.1063/1.4769904 ↗
42. Y. Wang, J. Li, D. Viehland, A differential magnetoelectric heterostructure: internal noise reduction and external noise cancellation. J. Appl. Phys. 118, 214103 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493626310.1063/1.4936263 ↗