journal article·2020-05

Synthesis, characterization, photocatalytic effect of thiourea and thioglycolic acid on ZnO/CuS nanocomposites for degradation of Mordant black 11 dye

S. Sharon Tamil Selvi, G. Hannah Priya, A. Alinda Shaly, L. Allwin Joseph, J. Mary Linet

Applied Physics A· Volume 126· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

ZnO/CuS nanocomposite was synthesized by hydrothermal technique using two different sulfur source such as TU = thiourea and TA = thioglycolic acid. Pure ZnO and CuS (TU and TA) nanoparticles were synthesized, and a comparative analysis was performed. X-ray diffraction discloses the average crystalline size of the ZnO/CuS (TU and TA) to be 18 nm and 12 nm, respectively. HR-TEM exhibits a particle size of 27.50 nm and 30.50 nm for ZnO/CuS (TU) and ZnO/CuS (TA). Brunauer–Emmett–Teller analysis confirms the surface area of ZnO/CuS (TU) to be 1.246 m2/g and ZnO/CuS (TA) to be 11.086 m2/g. The band gaps were estimated to be 3.1 eV for ZnO/CuS (TU) and 1.6 eV and 2.64 eV for ZnO/CuS (TA). The photocatalytic activity of ZnO, ZnO/CuS (TU) and ZnO/CuS (TA) nanocomposites was investigated by the solar irradiation of mordant black 11 dye in an aqueous medium.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. G. Murugadoss, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 28, 587–593 (2012)10.1016/S1005-0302(12)60102-9 ↗
2. M. Saranya, C. Santhosh, S. Prathap Augustine, A. Nirmala Grace, J. Exp. Nanosci. 9, 329–336 (2014)10.1080/17458080.2012.661471 ↗
3. A. Naveed Ul Haq, A. Nadhman, I. Ullah, G. Mustafa, M. Yasinzai, I. Khan, J. Nanomater 2017, 1–14 (2017)10.1155/2017/8510342 ↗
4. B. Pejjai, M. Reddivari, T.R.R. Kotte, Mater. Chem. Phys. 239, 122030 (2020)10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122030 ↗
5. F. Ghribi, A. Alyamani, Z. Ben Ayadi, K. Djessas, L. EL Mir, Energy Procedia 84, 197–203 (2015)10.1016/j.egypro.2015.12.314 ↗
6. M. Pal, N.R. Mathews, E. Sanchez-Mora, U. Pal, F. Paraguay-Delgado, X. Mathew, J. Nanopart. Res. 17, 301 (2015)10.1007/s11051-015-3103-5 ↗
7. S. Goel, Feng Chen, Weibo Cai. Small 10, 631–645 (2014)10.1002/smll.201301174 ↗
8. J. Xu, X. Cui, J. Zhang, H. Liang, H. Wang, J. Li, Bull. Mater. Sci. 31, 189–192 (2008)10.1007/s12034-008-0033-1 ↗
9. F.F. Castillón-Barraza, M.H. Farías, J.H. Coronado-López, M.A. Encinas-Romero, M. Pérez-Tello, R. Herrera-Urbina, A. Posada-Amarillas, Adv. Sci. Lett. 4, 596–601 (2011)10.1166/asl.2011.1249 ↗
10. U.T.D. Thuy, N.Q. Liem, C.M.A. Parlett, G.M. Lalev, K. Wilson, Catal. Commun. 44, 62–67 (2014)10.1016/j.catcom.2013.07.030 ↗
11. H.R. Ghorbani, F.P. Mehr, H. Pazoki, B.M. Rahmani, Orient. J. Chem. 31, 1219–1221 (2015)10.13005/ojc/310281 ↗
12. L. Zhu, M. Zheng, J. Lu, M. Xu, H.J. Seo, J. Nanomater. (2014)10.1155/2014/126475 ↗
13. G. Yang, W. Yan, Q. Zhang, S. Shen, S. Ding, Nanoscale 5, 12432–12439 (2013)10.1039/c3nr03462c ↗
14. X. Jiang, Yi Xie, Lu Jun, W. He, L. Zhu, Y. Qian, J. Mater. Chem. 10, 2193–2196 (2000)10.1039/b002486o ↗
15. P. Lu, W. Zhou, Y. Li, J. Wang, Wu Ping, Appl. Surf. Sci. 399, 396–402 (2017)10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.113 ↗
16. J. Yu, J. Zhang, S. Liu, J. Phys. Chem. B C 114(32), 13642–13649 (2010)10.1021/jp101816c ↗
17. M. Lee, K. Yong, Nanotechnology 23, 194014 (2012)10.1088/0957-4484/23/19/194014 ↗
18. Z. Liu, J. Han, Li Han, K. Guo, Y. Li, T. Cui, Bo Wang, X. Liang, Mater. Chem. Phys. 141, 804–809 (2013)10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.06.007 ↗
19. Q. Cong, X. He, M. Gao, X. Ma, G. Li, Mater. Res. Innov. 18, S4–740 (2014)10.1179/1432891714Z.000000000775 ↗
20. D. Hong, W. Zang, X. Guo, Y. Fu, H. He, J. Sun, L. Xing, B. Liu, X. Xue, ACS Appl. Mater. 8, 21302–21314 (2016)10.1021/acsami.6b05252 ↗
21. P. Kundu, P.A. Deshpande, G. Madras, N. Ravishankar, J. Mater. Chem. 21, 4209–4216 (2011)10.1039/c0jm03116j ↗
22. U. Shamraiz, R.A. Hussain, A. Badshah, J. Solid State Chem. 238, 25–40 (2016)10.1016/j.jssc.2016.02.046 ↗
23. M. Basu, N. Garg, A.K. Ganguli, J. Mater. Chem. 2, 7517–7525 (2014)10.1039/C3TA15446G ↗
24. A. Kołodziejczak-Radzimska, E. Markiewicz, T. Jesionowski, J. Nanomater. 2012, 15 (2012)10.1155/2012/656353 ↗
25. S. Harish, M. Sabarinathan, J. Archana, M. Navaneethan, K.D. Nisha, S. Ponnusamy, V. Gupta et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 418, 147–155 (2017)10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.164 ↗
26. R. Sharma, F. Alam, A.K. Sharma, V. Dutta, S.K. Dhawan, J. Mater. Chem. 2, 8142–8151 (2014)10.1039/C4TB00977K ↗
27. H. Qu, L. Cao, Su Ge, W. Liu, R. Gao, C. Xia, J. Qin, J. Nanopart. Res. 16, 2762 (2014)10.1007/s11051-014-2762-y ↗
28. Y. Zhang, B. Huang, P. Li, X. Wang, Y. Zhang, Tribol. Int. 58, 7–11 (2013)10.1016/j.triboint.2012.09.004 ↗
29. J. Varghese, K.T. Varghese, Mater. Chem. Phys. 167, 258–264 (2015)10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.10.041 ↗
30. R. Ullah, J. Dutta, J. Hazard. Mater. 156, 194–200 (2008)10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.12.033 ↗