Hydraulic pressure and temperature effects on the structural, morphological and electrical properties of SeO2 powders
Source abstract
Abstract
Herein, powders of SeO2 are subjected to hydraulic pressure in the range of 1.0–12 MPa and heating cycles in the range of 290–383 K. The pressure and temperature effects on the crystalline nature, plane orientations, structural parameters, surface morphology, composition, electrical resistivity, capacitance spectra and conductance spectra are explored. It is observed that hydraulic pressure value of 6.0 MPa is a critical value at which the tetragonal SeO2 grains prefer (020) plane orientation over (011) planes. The (020) plane orientations resulted in remarkable changes in the lattice parameters, structural parameters, electrical resistivity, capacitance and conductance spectra. In addition, the heating and cooling cycles of the samples pressed at 10 MPa have shown that the transition of the planes is permanent. The heated and cooled pellets displayed resonance–antiresonance in the capacitance spectra near 0.43 GHz. The resonance–antiresonance phenomena are accompanied with negative conductance effect near 0.43 GHz. The enhancements in the properties of SeO2 powders that are achieved via pressure and temperature effects make them appropriate for electronic circuit technological applications.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Phase-change materials and chalcogenides · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. R. Gusain, K. Gupta, P. Joshi, O.P. Khatri, Adv. Coll. interf. sci. 272, 102009 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2019.10200910.1016/j.cis.2019.102009 ↗
2. R.K. Jain, A. Khanna, Y.K. Gautam, B.P. Singh, Appl. Surf. Sci. 536, 147804 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14780410.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147804 ↗
3. A. Omar, A.F. Qasrawi, Phys. Stat. sol. (B) 257, 1900711 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.20190071110.1002/pssb.201900711 ↗
4. R. Kant, A.K. Singh, A. Arora, Vacuum 189, 110247 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.11024710.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110247 ↗
5. L.H. Gaabour, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 9, 4319–4325 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.02.05710.1016/j.jmrt.2020.02.057 ↗
6. M. Kazemi, A. Akbari, H. Zarrinfar, S. Soleimanpour, Z. Sabouri, M. Khatami, M. Darroudi, J. Inorg. Organomet. P 30, 3036–3044 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-020-01462-410.1007/s10904-020-01462-4 ↗
7. Shangpliang, O. Risuklang. Development of new methods for the synthesis of organic compounds using selenium dioxide. (2021), Ph. D. thesis (North-Eastern Hill university)
8. H. Suresh, A.M. Vaibhav, H.N. Suresh, J. Lang, Culture 5, 1083–1092 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.171410.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1714 ↗
9. M. Chinnathambi, A. Sakthisabarimoorthi, M. Jose, R. Robert, Mater. Chem. Phys. 272, 124970 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.12497010.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124970 ↗
10. L. Lakov, Machines. Technolo. Mater. 15, 38–41 (2021)
11. A. Grzechnik, L. Farina, R. Lauck, K. Syassen, I. Loa, P. Bouvier, J. Solid State Chem. 168, 184–191 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/jssc.2002.970810.1006/jssc.2002.9708 ↗
12. A. Mukhopadhyay, B. Basu, Int. Mater. Rev. 52, 257–288 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1179/174328007X16028110.1179/174328007X160281 ↗
13. K. Shigematsu, Y. Terui, S. Matsuzaka, Y. Takahashi, Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 27, 904–907 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2006.11.00310.1016/j.msec.2006.11.003 ↗
14. M. Javidani, D. Larouche, Int. Mater. Rev. 59, 132–158 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1179/1743280413Y.000000002710.1179/1743280413Y.0000000027 ↗
15. S. Swathi, B.J. Rani, G. Ravi, R. Yuvakkumar, S.I. Hong, D. Velauthapillai, B. Saravanakumar, M. Thambidurai, C. Dang, J. Phys. Chem. Sol. 145, 109544 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2020.10954410.1016/j.jpcs.2020.109544 ↗
16. T. Mizushima, M. Nitta, Phys. Rev. B 97, 024506 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.02450610.1103/PhysRevB.97.024506 ↗
17. A. Grzechnik, L. Farina, R. Lauck, K. Syassen, I. Loa, P. Bouvier, J. Solid State Chem. 168, 184–191 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/jssc.2002.970810.1006/jssc.2002.9708 ↗
18. C. Jeworrek, M. Pühse, R. Winter, Langmuir 24, 11851–11859 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/la801947v10.1021/la801947v ↗
19. N.C. Craig, A. Chen, K.H. Suh, S. Klee, G.C. Mellau, B.P. Winnewisser, M. Winnewisser, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 4789–4790 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja963819e10.1021/ja963819e ↗
20. D. Dubbeldam, K.S. Walton, T.J. Vlugt, S. Calero, Adv. Theory Simul. 2, 1900135 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.20190013510.1002/adts.201900135 ↗
21. S.E. AlGarni, A.F. Qasrawi, Res. Phys. 16, 102901 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2019.10290110.1016/j.rinp.2019.102901 ↗
22. V.D. Mote, Y. Purushotham, B.N. Dole, J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 6, 1–8 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-7235-6-610.1186/2251-7235-6-6 ↗
23. B. Zhang, J. Xiong, L. Chen, X. Li, A.B. Murphy, J. Phys. D. 53, 173001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab6ea110.1088/1361-6463/ab6ea1 ↗
24. W.Q. Lim, S. Shanmugan, M. Devarajan, Surf. Rev. Lett. 25, 1950017 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218625X1950017310.1142/S0218625X19500173 ↗
25. B.D. Nagasa, A.T. Raghavender, L.K. Kebede, T. Anjaneyulu, M.B. Regasa, Sci. Technol. Art. Res. J. 4, 84–87 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4314/star.v4i1.1310.4314/star.v4i1.13 ↗
26. D. Orosel, O. Leynaud, P. Balog, M. Jansen, J. solid state chem. 177, 1631–1638 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2003.12.02810.1016/j.jssc.2003.12.028 ↗
27. S.J. Seo, H.I. Joh, H.T. Kim, S.H. Moon, J. Power Sour. 163, 403–408 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.00810.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.008 ↗
28. E.Y. Kim, S.D. Bu, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 77, 1198–1203 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.77.119810.3938/jkps.77.1198 ↗
29. U. Chandra, Y.K. Sharma, A. Gupta, G. Parthasarathy, A.K. Bandyopadhyay, Phil. Mag. lett. 83, 273–285 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/095008303100007740310.1080/0950083031000077403 ↗
30. S. Kuprenaite, V. Astié, S. Margueron, C. Millon, J.M. Decams, Z. Saltyte, P. Boulet, V. Plausinaitiene, A. Abrutis, A. Bartasyte, Coatings 9, 35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings901003510.3390/coatings9010035 ↗
31. S. Yamauchi, K. Ishibashi, S. Hatakeyama, J. Cryst. Process Technol. 4, 185 (2014)10.4236/jcpt.2014.44023 ↗
32. P. Sinsermsuksakul, J. Heo, W. Noh, A.S. Hock, R.G. Gordon, Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 1116–1125 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20110033010.1002/aenm.201100330 ↗
33. S. Yoo, S. Lee, Q.H. Park, ACS Photonics 5, 2537–2537 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0140010.1021/acsphotonics.7b01400 ↗
34. G. Kim, I.G. Kim, J.H. Baek, O.K. Kwon, Appl. Phys. Let. 83, 1249–1251 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.160051210.1063/1.1600512 ↗
35. Z. Roswitha, Single crystal field-effect transistors based on layered semiconductors, PhD diss., University of Konstanz 2005. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-15957
36. S. Saadaoui, O. Fathallah, H. Maaref, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 161, 110418 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.11041810.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110418 ↗
37. A.F. Qasrawi, H.D. Aloushi, Mater. Res. Express 6, 086435 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab208310.1088/2053-1591/ab2083 ↗