Wave propagation in an anisotropic metamaterial with single-sheeted hyperboloid dispersion relation
Source abstract
Abstract
We investigate the wave propagation in an anisotropic metamaterial with single-sheeted hyperboloid dispersion relation. Based on boundary conditions and dispersion relations, we find that the opposite amphoteric refraction, such that E (or H)-polarized waves are positively refracted whereas H (or E)-polarized waves are negatively refracted, can occur at the interface associated with the anisotropic metamaterial. Under a certain condition, both E- and H-polarized waves can exhibit the same single-sheeted hyperboloid or straight line dispersion relation, while the two polarized waves exhibit different propagation characteristics. We expect some potential device applications can be derived based on the unique amphoteric refraction properties.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Antenna Design and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. A. Yariv, P. Yeh, Optical Waves in Crystals (Wiley, New York, 1984)
2. M. Born, E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1999)10.1017/CBO9781139644181 ↗
3. V.G. Veselago, Sov. Phys. Uspekhi 10, 509 (1968)10.1070/PU1968v010n04ABEH003699 ↗
4. D.R. Smith, W.J. Padilla, D.C. Vier, S.C. Nemat-Nasser, S. Schultz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4184 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4184 ↗
5. J.B. Pendry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3966 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3966 ↗
6. R.A. Shelby, D.R. Smith, S. Schultz, Science 292, 77 (2001)10.1126/science.1058847 ↗
7. C.G. Parazzoli, R.B. Greegor, K. Li, B.E.C. Koltenba, M. Tanielian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 107401 (2003)10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.107401 ↗
8. A.A. Houck, J.B. Brock, I.L. Chuang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 37401 (2003)10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.137401 ↗
9. I.V. Lindell, S.A. Tretyakov, K.I. Nikoskinen, S. Ilvonen, Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 31, 129 (2001)10.1002/mop.1378 ↗
10. L. Hu, S.T. Chui, Phys. Rev. B 66, 085108 (2002)10.1103/PhysRevB.66.085108 ↗
11. D.R. Smith, D. Schurig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 077405 (2003)10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.077405 ↗
12. L. Zhou, C.T. Chan, P. Sheng, Phys. Rev. B 68, 115424 (2003)10.1103/PhysRevB.68.115424 ↗
13. H. Luo, W. Hu, X. Yi, H. Liu, J. Zhu, Opt. Commun. 254, 353 (2005)10.1016/j.optcom.2005.05.050 ↗
14. N.H. Shen, Q. Wang, J. Chen, Y.X. Fan, J. Ding, H.T. Wang, Y. Tian, N.B. Ming, Phys. Rev. B 72, 153104 (2005)10.1103/PhysRevB.72.153104 ↗
15. H. Luo, W. Shu, F. Li, Z. Ren, Opt. Commun. 267, 271 (2006)10.1016/j.optcom.2006.06.009 ↗
16. H. Luo, W. Hu, W. Shu, F. Li, Z. Ren, Europhys. Lett. 74, 1081 (2006)10.1209/epl/i2006-10046-4 ↗
17. R.A. Depine, M.E. Inchaussandague, A. Lakhtakia, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 949 (2006)10.1364/JOSAA.23.000949 ↗
18. R.A. Depine, M.E. Inchaussandague, A. Lakhtakia, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 23, 514 (2006)10.1364/JOSAB.23.000514 ↗