Calcium in ancient glazes and glasses: a XAFS study
Source abstract
Abstract
Ceramic tiles used to manufacture artistic panels during the XVI to the XVIII centuries were decorated with high-lead soda-lime glazes, incorporating a diversity of chromophore cations, as ascertained by SRXRF (synchrotron radiation X-ray fluorescence). Previous X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) studies have shown that sodium and lead are hosted by the glassy matrix in those glazes. However, the possible role of calcium as a modifier of the tetrahedral silica network is not fully clarified, despite being recognized that calcium cations alter some fundamental properties of glazes, namely transparency. An X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) study of glazes with varied colorings was therefore undertaken at Ca K- and L-edges. Well crystallized oxide minerals were used to model distinct coordination environments by oxygen atoms – close to octahedral geometry in calcite and dodecahedral in gypsum – while fluorite was chosen to mimic ideal cubic coordination. A first XAS approach suggested a minor variation in the energy separation between L2–L3 absorption edges when comparing blue and yellow glazes, irrespective of the period of manufacture. A further study on the X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) carried out at the K-edge corroborated this difference and, along with the theoretical spectra modeling performed with the FEFF code, allowed interpreting of the Ca 1s absorption spectra of glazes as arising from a non-regular high-coordination environment within the silica matrix.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis · Glass properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. J.M. Santos Simões, “Azulejaria” in Portugal along XV and XVI centuries. A General Introduction (Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Portugal, 1990) [in Portuguese]
2. J. Molera, T. Pradell, N. Salvadó, M. Vendrell-Saz, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82, 2871 (1999)10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02170.x ↗
3. L. Cormier, L. Galoisy, J.-M. Delaye, D. Ghaleb, G. Calas, Comptes Rendues de l’Acad. Sc. Paris t.2, IV, 249 (2001)10.1016/S1296-2147(01)01168-4 ↗
4. L. Cormier, D.R. Neuville, Chem. Geol. 213, 103 (2004)10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.08.049 ↗
5. M.O. Figueiredo, T.P. Silva, J.P. Veiga, Appl. Phys. A 83, 209 (2006)10.1007/s00339-006-3509-0 ↗
6. M.O. Figueiredo, J.P. Veiga, T.P. Silva, J.P. Mirão, S. Pascarelli, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 238, 134 (2005)10.1016/j.nimb.2005.06.033 ↗
7. H. Effenberger, K. Mereiter, I. Zemann, Z. Kristallogr. 156, 233 (1981)10.1524/zkri.1981.156.3-4.233 ↗
8. R.W.G. Wyckoff, Crystal Structures, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1964), Vol. 1, pp. 239–241
9. P. Pederson, D. Semmingsen, Acta Cryst. B 38, 1074 (1982)10.1107/S0567740882004993 ↗
10. P. Chevallier, P. Dehz, F. Legrand, A. Erko, Y. Agafonov, L.A. Panchenko, A. Yashkin, J. Trace Microprobe Techniques 14, 517 (1996)
11. J.X. Wang, D. Piccot, P. Chevallier, F. Legrand, K. Abbas, Note CEA-N-2756 (1993)
12. M.J. Carmezim, M.O. Figueiredo, Adv. Mater. Forum I 230–232, 311 (2002)10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.230-232.311 ↗
13. J. Susini, M. Salomé, B. Fayard, R. Ortega, B. Kaulich, Surf. Rev. Lett. 9, 203 (2002)10.1142/S0218625X02001793 ↗
14. M.O. Figueiredo, J.P. Veiga, T.P. Silva, J.P. Mirão, S. Pascarelli, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 238, 134 (2005)10.1016/j.nimb.2005.06.033 ↗
15. M.O. Figueiredo, AIP Conf. Proc. 882, 205 (2007)10.1063/1.2644475 ↗
16. A.L. Ankudinov, J.J. Rehr, Phys. Rev. B 62, 2437 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevB.62.2437 ↗