journal article·2007-03-13

Negative index and indefinite media waveguide couplers

A. Degiron, D.R. Smith, J.J. Mock, B.J. Justice, J. Gollub

Applied Physics A· Volume 87· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

We study the coupling interaction between dielectric waveguides and coupling elements made from negative-refracting media. The coupling configuration consists of a length of dielectric waveguide, which terminates either directly into or near a planar layer composed of the negative-refracting medium, and is followed by a second waveguide. Radiation output from the first waveguide is refocused at the position of the second waveguide, so that the negative-refracting layer serves as a coupler between the waveguides. Because both isotropic negative-index layers and bilayers of indefinite media can recover the near-field, evanescent components of a source field distribution, the coupling between the input and output waveguides can be highly efficient – in principle providing perfect, lossless coupling. We present simulations and some initial experimental results illustrating the coupling effect, and speculate on the potential for optical fiber couplers and integrated modulators.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microwave Engineering and Waveguides · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. R.M. Walser, Proc. SPIE 4467, 1 (2001)10.1117/12.432921 ↗
2. D.R. Smith, W. Padilla, D.C. Vier, S.C. Nemat-Nasser, S. Schultz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4184 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4184 ↗
3. V.G. Veselago, Sov. Phys. Uspekhi 10, 509 (1968)10.1070/PU1968v010n04ABEH003699 ↗
4. R.A. Shelby, D.R. Smith, S. Schultz, Science 292, 77 (2001)10.1126/science.1058847 ↗
5. G. Parazzoli, R.B. Greegor, K. Li, B.E.C. Koltenbah, M. Tanielian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 107401 (2003)10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.107401 ↗
6. A.A. Houck, J.B. Brock, I.L. Chuang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 137401 (2003)10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.137401 ↗
7. R.W. Ziolkowski, N. Engheta, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 51, 2546 (2003)10.1109/TAP.2003.818317 ↗
8. J.B. Pendry, Opt. Express 11, 639 (2003)10.1364/OE.11.000639 ↗
9. D.R. Smith, J.B. Pendry, M.C.K. Wiltshire, Science 305, 788 (2004)10.1126/science.1096796 ↗
10. A. Lakhtakia, M. McCall, New J. Phys. 7, 171 (2005)10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/E03 ↗
11. V.G. Veselago, L. Braginsky, V. Shkover, C. Hafner, J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 3, 189 (2006)10.1166/jctn.2006.3000 ↗
12. A.L. Pokrovsky, A.L. Efros, Physica B 338, 333 (2003)10.1016/j.physb.2003.08.015 ↗
13. W.T. Lu, S. Sridhar, Opt. Express 13, 10673 (2005)10.1364/OPEX.13.010673 ↗
14. J.B. Pendry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3966 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3966 ↗
15. J.T. Shen, P.M. Platzman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3286 (2002)10.1063/1.1471933 ↗
16. G. Gomez-Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 077401 (2003)10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.077401 ↗
17. D.R. Smith, D. Schurig, M. Rosenbluth, S. Schultz, S.A. Ramakrishna, J.B. Pendry, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 1506 (2003)10.1063/1.1554779 ↗
18. I.A. Larkin, M.I. Stockman, Nano Lett. 5, 339 (2005)10.1021/nl047957a ↗
19. A. Grbic, G.V. Elefheriades, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 117403 (2003)10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.117403 ↗
20. B.I. Popa, S.A. Cummer, Phys. Rev. E 73, 016617 (2006)10.1103/PhysRevE.73.016617 ↗
21. N. Fang, H. Lee, C. Sun, X. Zhang, Science 308, 534 (2005)10.1126/science.1108759 ↗
22. D.O.S. Melville, R.J. Blaikie, Opt. Express 13, 2127 (2005)10.1364/OPEX.13.002127 ↗
23. R.J. Blaikie, D.O.S. Melville, M.M. Alkalsi, Microelectron. Eng. 83, 723 (2006)10.1016/j.mee.2006.01.056 ↗
24. D.R. Smith, N. Kroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2933 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2933 ↗
25. J.B. Pendry, S.A. Ramakrishna, J. Phys. 15, 6345 (2003)
26. A. Lakhtakia, Int. J. Infrared Milli. 23, 339 (2002)10.1023/A:1015038701978 ↗
27. D.R. Smith, D. Schurig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 077405 (2003)10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.077405 ↗
28. D. Schurig, D.R. Smith, New J. Phys. 7, 162 (2005)10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/162 ↗
29. P. Kolinko, D.R. Smith, Opt. Express 11, 640 (2003)10.1364/OE.11.000640 ↗
30. A. Yariv, Optical Electronics in Modern Communications (Oxford University Press, New York, 1997), p. 521
31. W.J. Padilla, A.J. Taylor, C. Highstrete, M. Lee, R.D. Averitt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 107401 (2006)10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.107401 ↗
32. D.R. Smith, S. Schultz, P. Markos, C.M. Soukoulis, Phys. Rev. B 65, 195104 (2002)10.1103/PhysRevB.65.195104 ↗
33. S. Zhang, W.J. Fan, N.C. Panoiu, K.J. Malloy, R.M. Osgood, S.R.J. Brueck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 137404 (2005)10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.137404 ↗
34. V.M. Shalaev, W.S. Cai, U.K. Chettiar, H.K. Yuan, A.K. Sarychev, V.P. Drachev, A.V. Kildishev, Opt. Lett. 30, 3356 (2005)10.1364/OL.30.003356 ↗
35. J. Zhou, T. Koschny, M. Kafesaki, E.N. Economou, J.B. Pendry, C.M. Soukoulis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 223902 (2005)10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.223902 ↗
36. G. Dolling, C. Enkrich, M. Wegener, C.M. Soukoulis, S. Linden, Opt. Lett. 31, 1800 (2006)10.1364/OL.31.001800 ↗
37. D.R. Smith, D. Schurig, J.J. Mock, P. Kolinko, P. Rye, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2244 (2004)10.1063/1.1690471 ↗
38. T. Koschny, P. Markos, D.R. Smith, C.M. Soukoulis, Phys. Rev. E 68, 065602 (2003)10.1103/PhysRevE.68.065602 ↗
39. B.J. Justice, J.J. Mock, L. Guo, A. Degiron, D. Schurig, D.R. Smith, Opt. Express 14, 8694 (2006)10.1364/OE.14.008694 ↗
40. D. Schurig, Int. J. Numer. Model. 19, 215 (2006)10.1002/jnm.607 ↗