Absolute phase effect in ultrafast optical responses of metal nanostructures
Source abstract
Abstract
We predict that nonlinear ultrafast electron photoemission by strong optical fields and, potentially, other nonlinear optical responses of metal nanostructures significantly depend on the absolute (carrier–envelope) phase of excitation pulses. Strong enhancement of the local optical fields produces these responses at excitation intensities lower by order(s) of magnitude than for known systems. Prospective applications include control of ultrafast electron emission and electron injection into nanosystems. A wider class of prospective applications is the determination of the absolute phase of pulses emitted by lasers and atoms, molecules, and condensed matter at relatively low intensities.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications · Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. R. Kienberger, E. Goulielmakis, M. Uiberacker, A. Baltuska, V. Yakovlev, F. Bammer, A. Scrinzi, T. Westerwalbesloh, U. Kleineberg, U. Heinzmann, M. Drescher, F. Krausz, Nature 427, 817 (2004)10.1038/nature02277 ↗
2. C. Lemell, X.-M. Tong, F. Krausz, J. Burgdoerfer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 076403 (2003)10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.076403 ↗
3. A. Apolonski, P. Dombi, G.G. Paulus, M. Kakehata, R. Holzwarth, T. Udem, C. Lemell, K. Torizuka, J. Burgdörfer, T.W. Hänsch, F. Krausz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 073902 (2004)10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.073902 ↗
4. F. Stietz, J. Bosbach, T. Wenzel, T. Vartanyan, A. Goldmann, F. Trägger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5644 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5644 ↗
5. M.I. Stockman, S.V. Faleev, D.J. Bergman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 067402 (2002)10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.067402 ↗
6. M.I. Stockman, D.J. Bergman, T. Kobayashi, Phys. Rev. B 69, 054202 (2004)10.1103/PhysRevB.69.054202 ↗
7. A. Kubo, K. Onda, H. Petek, Z. Sun, Y.S. Jung, H.K. Kim, Nano Lett. 5, 1123 (2005)10.1021/nl0506655 ↗
8. M. Aeschlimann, M. Bauer, D. Bayer, T. Brixner, F.J. Garcia de Abajo, W. Pfeiffer, M. Rohmer, C. Spindler, F. Steeb, Nature 446, 301 (2007)10.1038/nature05595 ↗
9. H. Rabitz, R. de Vivie-Riedle, M. Motzkus, K. Kompa, Science 288, 824 (2000)10.1126/science.288.5467.824 ↗
10. L.V. Keldysh, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. (USSR) 47, 1945 (1964)
11. L.V. Keldysh, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. (USSR) 20, 1307 (1965)
12. P.B. Corkum, N.H. Burnett, F. Brunel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1259 (1989)10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1259 ↗
13. L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory (Pergamon, Oxford, New York, 1965)
14. P.B. Johnson, R.W. Christy, Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370 (1972)10.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370 ↗
15. J. Kupersztych, P. Monchicourt, M. Raynaud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5180 (2001)10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5180 ↗
16. S.E. Irvine, P. Dombi, G. Farkas, A.Y. Elezzabi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 1468011 (2006)10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.146801 ↗