Growth of TiO2 nanosheet-array thin films by quick chemical bath deposition for dye-sensitized solar cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Rutile TiO2 nanofilms, which were composed of many nanosheet-array domains with different orientations, were synthesized directly on fluorine-doped SnO2 conductive glass (FTO) substrates by a chemical deposition method in a short time in this paper. The average thickness of the nanosheets is about 10 nm; the nanosheets in each domain were parallel to each other and perpendicular to the substrate. The size and profile of the domains have a good correspondence to those of the FTO grains of the substrate, indicating a coherent nucleating and epitaxial growing nature of the films. The nanosheets split gradually and finally developed into nanofibers on prolonging the growing time to 20 h. Dye-sensitized solar cells, which were fabricated with the films, present an open-circuit voltage of 0.63 V and a short-circuit current of 7.02 mA/cm2, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. B. O’Regan, M. Gratzel, Nature 353, 737 (1991)10.1038/353737a0 ↗
2. K. Keis, E. Magnusson, H. Lindstrom, S.E. Lindquist, A. Hagfeldt, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 73, 51 (2002)10.1016/S0927-0248(01)00110-6 ↗
3. H.J. Snaith, C. Ducati, Nano Lett. 10, 1259 (2010)10.1021/nl903809r ↗
4. K. Sayama, H. Sugihara, H. Arakawa, Chem. Mater. 10, 3825 (1998)10.1021/cm980111l ↗
5. G.K. Mor, O.K. Varghese, M. Paulose, K. Shankar, C.A. Grimes, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 90, 2011 (2006)10.1016/j.solmat.2006.04.007 ↗
6. C.J. Barbe, F. Arendse, P. Comte, M. Jirousek, F. Lenzmann, V. Shklover, M. Gratzel, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80, 3157 (1997)10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03245.x ↗
7. U.O. Krasovec, M. Berginc, M. Hocevar, M. Topic, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 93, 379 (2009)10.1016/j.solmat.2008.11.012 ↗
8. G.K. Mor, K. Shankar, M. Paulose, O.K. Varghese, C.A. Grimes, Nano Lett. 6, 215 (2006)10.1021/nl052099j ↗
9. X.J. Feng, K. Shankar, O.K. Varghese, M. Paulose, T.J. Latempa, C.A. Grimes, Nano Lett. 8, 3781 (2008)10.1021/nl802096a ↗
10. J.B. Chu, S.M. Huang, D.W. Zhang, Z.Q. Bian, X.D. Li, Z. Sun, X.J. Yin, Appl. Phys. A, Mater. Sci. Process. 95, 849 (2009)10.1007/s00339-009-5084-7 ↗
11. K. Shimizu, H. Imai, H. Hirashima, K. Tsukuma, Thin Solid Films 351, 220 (1999)10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00084-X ↗
12. S. Yamabi, H. Imai, Thin Solid Films 434, 86 (2003)10.1016/S0040-6090(03)00539-X ↗
13. Y.F. Gao, Y. Masuda, Z.F. Peng, T. Yonezawa, K. Koumoto, J. Mater. Chem. 13, 608 (2003)10.1039/b208681f ↗
14. K.J. Kim, K.D. Benkstein, J. van de Lagemaat, A.J. Frank, Chem. Mater. 14, 1042 (2002)10.1021/cm0106421 ↗
15. N.G. Park, J. van de Lagemaat, A.J. Frank, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 8989 (2000)10.1021/jp994365l ↗
16. B. Liu, E.S. Aydil, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 3985 (2009)10.1021/ja8078972 ↗
17. J. Bisquert, A. Zaban, M. Greenshtein, I. Mora-Sero, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 13550 (2004)10.1021/ja047311k ↗
18. H.J. Snaith, M. Gratzel, Adv. Mater. 19, 3643 (2007)10.1002/adma.200602085 ↗
19. A.C. Fisher, L.M. Peter, E.A. Ponomarev, A.B. Walker, K.G.U. Wijayantha, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 949 (2000)10.1021/jp993220b ↗
20. J. Bisquert, V.S. Vikhrenko, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 2313 (2004)10.1021/jp035395y ↗
21. S. Pavasupree, S. Ngamsinlapasathian, Y. Suzuki, S. Yoshikawa, in 2nd Joint Int. Conf. Sustainable Energy and Environment (2006), p. 21
22. A.M. More, T.P. Gujar, J.L. Gunjakar, C.D. Lokhande, O.S. Joo, Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 2682 (2008)10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.08.003 ↗