Resilient silk captures prey in black widow cobwebs
Source abstract
Abstract
The gumfoot thread of a black widow (Latrodectus hesperus) spider’s cob web is a spring-loaded trap that yanks walking insects into the web. Since spider silks are known as energy dissipating materials, we investigated this trap to find out where the energy is stored. Using previously measured material properties, we modeled the gumfoot thread as a damped harmonic oscillator and compared it to high speed video analysis of prey capture. These measurements show that the gumfoot thread is plastically deformed during prey capture and cannot be the site of energy storage. We then measured the material properties of scaffolding silk that makes up the upper portion of the cob web. Scaffolding silk is highly resilient (90%) at strains less than 3%. This energy storage is sufficient to drive the oscillations seen in prey capture and is consistent with the measured kinematics. This study is the first demonstration of energy-storage as a primary biological function for spider silk.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research · Advanced Materials and Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Kaplan D, et al. (1994) Silk: Biology, structure, properties and genetics. In: Kaplan D, et al. Silk Polymers: Materials Sciences and Biotechnology. Am Chem Soc, Washington DC, pp 2–16
2. Gosline JM, Guerette PA, Ortlepp CS, Savage KN (1999) J. Exp. Biol. 202:329510.1242/jeb.202.23.3295 ↗
3. Hinman MB, Jones JA, Lewis RA (2000) Trends Biotechnol. 18:37410.1016/S0167-7799(00)01481-5 ↗
4. vanBeek JD, Hess S, Vollrath F, Meier BH (2002) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 99:1026610.1073/pnas.152162299 ↗
5. Viney C (2000) Silk fibers: Origins, nature and consequences of structure. In: Structural Biological Materials Design and Structure-Property Relationships, edited by Elices M. Pergamon, New York pp 293–333
6. Vollrath F, Knight DP (2001) Nature 410:54110.1038/35069000 ↗
7. Foelix RF (1996) Biology of Spiders. Oxford University Press, New York
8. Denny M (1976) J. Exp. Biol. 65:48310.1242/jeb.65.2.483 ↗
9. Vollrath F (1992) Sci. Am. 266:7010.1038/scientificamerican0392-70 ↗
10. Benjamin SP, Zschokke S (2002) J. Insect Behav. 15:79110.1023/A:1021175507377 ↗
11. Szlep R (1965) Proc. Zool. Soc. London 145:7510.1111/j.1469-7998.1965.tb02001.x ↗
12. C.A. Botham, Y. Juarez, A.M.F. Moore, submitted to J. Exp. Biol. (in review)
13. Schmidt-Nielson K (1976) Anmial Physiology: Adaptation and Environment. Cambridge University Press, London
14. Moore AMF, Tran K (1999) Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 24:27710.1016/S0141-8130(98)00090-7 ↗
15. Lawrence BA, Vierra CA, Moore AMF (2004) Biomacromol. 5:689