journal article·2006-02

Structure and stability of binary alloy surfaces: Segregation, relaxation, and ordering from first-principles calculations

S. Müller, M. Stöhr, O. Wieckhorst

Applied Physics A· Volume 82· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Although modern computer codes based on density functional theory (DFT) allow the reliable prediction of many surface properties, they often cannot be applied, when the problem of interest demands a consideration of huge configuration spaces or model systems containing many thousand atoms. An important example are binary alloy surfaces where substitutional ordering phenomena on a mesoscopic scale and surface segregation are involved. It will be demonstrated how the combination of first-principle calculations with cluster expansions (CE) and Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations allows for a quantitative prediction of disordered alloy surface properties without any empirical parameters. The concept will be applied to the Pt25Rh75(111) surface. Our results are in excellent agreement with experimental studies.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Theoretical and Computational Physics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Reuter K, Scheffler M (2001) Phys. Rev. B 65:03540610.1103/PhysRevB.65.035406 ↗
2. Blum V, Hammer L, Schmidt C, Meier W, Wieckhorst O, Müller S, Heinz K (2002) Phys. Rev. Lett. 89:26610210.1103/PhysRevLett.89.266102 ↗
3. Wieckhorst O, Müller S, Hammer L, Heinz K (2004) Phys. Rev. Lett. 92:19550310.1103/PhysRevLett.92.195503 ↗
4. Hammer L, Blum V, Schmidt C, Wieckhorst O, Meier W, Müller S, Heinz K (2005) Phys. Rev. B 71:07541310.1103/PhysRevB.71.075413 ↗
5. Müller S (2003) J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15:R142910.1088/0953-8984/15/34/201 ↗
6. de Gironcoli S, Giannozzi P, Baroni S (1991) Phys. Rev. Lett. 66:211610.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2116 ↗
7. Ducastelle F, Gautier N (1976) J. Phys. F 6:203910.1088/0305-4608/6/11/005 ↗
8. Sluiter M, Turchi PEA (1989) Phys. Rev. B 40:1121510.1103/PhysRevB.40.11215 ↗
9. Sigli C, Sanchez JM (1988) Acta Metall. 36:36710.1016/0001-6160(88)90012-0 ↗
10. Sanchez JM, Ducastelle F, Gratias D (1984) Physica A 128:33410.1016/0378-4371(84)90096-7 ↗
11. Platzgummer E, Sporn M, Koller R, Forsthuber S, Schmidt M, Hofer W, Varga P (1999) Surf. Sci. 419:23610.1016/S0039-6028(98)00800-0 ↗
12. Hebenstreit ELD, Hebenstreit W, Schmid M, Varga P (1999) Surf. Sci. 441:44110.1016/S0039-6028(99)00880-8 ↗
13. Powell BR, Chen Y-L (1989) Appl. Catal. 53:23310.1016/S0166-9834(00)80023-8 ↗
14. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Phys. Rev. B 54:1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
15. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Comp. Mater. Sci. 6:1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
16. Zunger A (1994) In: Turchi PEA, Gonis A (eds) Statics and Dynamics of Alloy Phase Transformations. Plenum Press, New York, p. 361
17. Laks DB, Ferreira LG, Froyen S, Zunger A (1992) Phys. Rev. B 46:1258710.1103/PhysRevB.46.12587 ↗
18. Conolly JWD, Williams AR (1983) Phys. Rev. B 27:516910.1103/PhysRevB.27.5169 ↗
19. Hart GLW, Blum V, Walorski MJ, Zunger A (2005) Nat. Mater. 4:39110.1038/nmat1374 ↗
20. Varney C, Hart GLW (2004) TMS Lett. 1:35
21. O. Wieckhorst, S. Müller: to be submitted
22. Garbulsky GD, Ceder G (1995) Phys. Rev. B 51:6710.1103/PhysRevB.51.67 ↗
23. Drautz R, Reichert H, Fähnle M, Dosch H, Sanchez JM (2001) Phys. Rev. Lett. 87:236102-110.1103/PhysRevLett.87.236102 ↗