journal article·2023-10

Structural, surface morphological and magnetic properties of Gd-doped BiFeO3 nanomaterials synthesised by EA chelated solution combustion method

T. Sindhu, A. T. Ravichandran, A. Robert Xavier, M. Kumaresavanji

Applied Physics A· Volume 129· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

The Gd-doped BiFeO3 nanocrystalline multiferroic at 5 and 9% have been synthesised by solution combustion method using ethanolamine as a fuel. The preliminary structural investigations of the as synthesised samples were carried out using X-Ray diffraction and is found to be crystalline with single phase rhombohedral (R3C) structure with an average particle size of 34 nm. The surface morphology and the elemental analyses were carried out using FESEM and EDX, respectively, which reveals the fluffy agglomerated particles and confirms the presence of the desired elements. The TEM was employed to analyse the particle size which confirms the higher crystallinity of as prepared BiFeO3 and Gd-doped BiFeO3. Field dependence of magnetization was measured using vibrating sample magnetometer and the obtained results suggest that the doping of hetero-valent Gd3+ ions in BiFeO3 nanoparticles enrich the ferromagnetic behaviour. An enhancement in magnetization by increasing Gd doping is observed which also increases the saturation magnetization (MS) by 2.7 emu/g and 2.9 emu/g for the doping concentrations 0.5 and 0.9, respectively. Dopant concentration, phase purity and particle size achieved by the combustion method are considered as the possible causes for improvement of qualities aforementioned. The significant magnetic moments by Gd doping indicates that these materials can be adopted for the potential applications in magnetic sensors.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multiferroics and related materials · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Dielectric properties of ceramics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. B. Jana, K. Ghosh, K. Rudrapal, P. Gaur, P.K. Shihabudeen, A.Y. Chaudhuri, Recent progess in flexible multiferroics. Front. Phys. 9, 822005 (2022)10.3389/fphy.2021.822005 ↗
2. A. Kumar, D. Kaur, Magnetoelectric heterostructures for next-generation MEMS magnetic field sensing applications. J. All. Compn. 897, 163091 (2022)10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163091 ↗
3. Q. Li, Y. Xuan, J. Wang, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 30, 109 (2005)10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2005.03.021 ↗
4. M. Abd, E. Aleem, A.M. Abu-dief, R.M. El-khatib, Appl. Organomet. Chem. 30, 1022 (2016)10.1002/aoc.3536 ↗
5. H. Naeimi, Z.S. Nazifi, J. Nanopart. Res. 15, 2026 (2013)10.1007/s11051-013-2026-2 ↗
6. J. Cao, Y. Wang, J. Yu, J. Xia, C. Zhang, D. Yin, U.O. Häfeli, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 277, 165 (2004)10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.10.022 ↗
7. A. Jordan, R. Scholz, P. Wust, H. Schirra, H. S. Thomas Schiestel, R. Felix, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 194, 185, (1999)10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00558-7 ↗
8. R.J.S. Lima, J.R. Jesus, K.O. Moura, C.B.R. Jesus, J.G.S. Duque, J. Appl. Phys. 123905, 1 (2013)
9. M. Amiri, K. Eskandari, M. Salavati-Niasari, Adv. Coll. Interface. Sci. 271, 101982 (2019)10.1016/j.cis.2019.07.003 ↗
10. M. Salavati-Niasaria, D. Ghanbaria, F. Davar, J. Alloys Comp. 492, 570 (2010)10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.11.183 ↗
11. J. Safari, L. Javadian, RSC Adv. 4, 48973 (2014)10.1039/C4RA06618A ↗
12. S. Chakraborty, S. Mukherjee, S. Mukherjee, J. Aust. Ceram. Soc. 51, 45 (2015)
13. V.A. Khomchenko, D.A. Kiselev, M. Kopcewicz, M. Maglione, V.V. Shvartsman, P. Borisov, W. Kleemann, A.M.L. Lopes, Y.G. Pogorelov, J.P. Araujo, R.M. Rubinger, N.A. Sobolev, J.M. Vieira, A.L. Kholkin, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321, 1692 (2009)10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.008 ↗
14. S. Haider, A. Liaquat, M.S. Awan, N. Ul-Haq and A. Ul Haq, J. Austr. Ceram. Soc. 57, 643, (2021)10.1007/s41779-021-00560-x ↗
15. A. Makridis, E. Myrovali, D. Sakellari, M. Angelakeris, Phys. Stat. Solidi B 257, 2000005 (2020)10.1002/pssb.202000005 ↗
16. N. Wang, X. Luo, L. Han, Z. Zhang, R. Zhang, H. Olin, Y. Yang, Nano-Micro Lett. 12, 81 (2020)10.1007/s40820-020-00420-6 ↗
17. R. Ianos, I. Laz˘au, C. P˘acurariu, J. Mater. Sci. 44, 1016–1023, (2009)10.1007/s10853-008-3226-5 ↗
18. A. Panahi, R. Monsef, E.A. Dawi, A.S. Hussein, M. Salavati-Niasari, Sol. Energy 258, 372 (2023)10.1016/j.solener.2023.04.030 ↗
19. C. Ederer, N.A. Spaldin, Phys. Rev. B 71, 060401 (2005)10.1103/PhysRevB.71.060401 ↗
20. D. Lee, M.G. Kim, S. Ryu, H.M. Jang, S.G. Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 222903 (2005)10.1063/1.1941474 ↗
21. A. Singh, V. Pandey, R.K. Kotnala, D. Pandey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 247602 (2008)10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.247602 ↗
22. J. Liu, M. Li, L. Pei, J. Wang, B. Yu, X. Wang, X. Zhao, J. Alloy Compd. 493, 544 (2010)10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.12.152 ↗
23. V.B. Naik, R. Mahendiran, Solid State Commun. 149, 754 (2009)10.1016/j.ssc.2009.03.003 ↗
24. G.L. Yuan, S.W. Or, Multiferroicity in polarized single phase BiSmFeO3 ceramics. JAP 100, 024109 (2006)
25. S. V. Fridrikh, J. H. Yu, M. P. Brenner, and G. C. Rutledge, “Controlling the fiber diameter during electrospinning,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, no. 14, Article ID 144502, pp. 1–4, (2003)10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.144502 ↗
26. R. Guo, L. Fang, W. Dong, F. Zheng, M. Shen, Magnetically separable BiFeO3 nanoparticles with a γ-Fe2O3 parasitic phase: controlled fabrication and enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. J. Mater. Chem. 21(46), 645–652 (2011)10.1039/c1jm13072b ↗
27. L. W. Martin, S. P. Crane, Y.-H. Chu et al., “Multiferroics and magnetoelectrics: thin films and nanostructures,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 20, no. 43, Article ID 434220, (2008)10.1088/0953-8984/20/43/434220 ↗
28. F. Kubel, H. Schmid, Structure of a ferroelectric and ferroelastic monodomain crystal of the perovskite BiFeO3. Acta Crystallogr. B 46(6), 698–702 (1990)10.1107/S0108768190006887 ↗
29. B. Kumar Vashistha, J. S. Bangruwa, S. P. Gairola, and V. Verma, Integrated Ferroelectrics 194, 21, (2018).10.1080/10584587.2018.1514869 ↗