Ultrahigh humidity tolerance of room-temperature hydrogen sensitive Pt–WO3 porous composite ceramics with ultra-large WO3 grains
Source abstract
Abstract
Two kinds of WO3 powders with average size of 100 nm and 5 μm have been used to prepare Pt–WO3 porous composite ceramics, whose WO3 grains are around 1 and 5 μm, respectively. The ceramics with 1 μm WO3 grains show a sensitivity of 755 to 0.08% H2 – 20% O2 – N2 in air of 30% relative humidity (RH) at room temperature, but show no response to this concentration of hydrogen in air of 50% RH due to the depression effect of water, which indicate a relatively low humidity tolerance for the ceramics. In contrast, the ceramics with 5 μm WO3 grains show sensitivities of 1200 and 80 to 0.08% H2 – 20% O2 – N2 at room temperature in air of 30% and 50% RH, respectively, and a sensitivity of 8 to 0.02% H2 – 20% O2 – N2 in air of 70% RH, which represent an ultrahigh humidity tolerance. These results clearly demonstrate that the microstructure of room-temperature hydrogen sensitive metal oxide (MOX) materials exerts a decisive influence on their humidity tolerance. Much attention should be paid to MOX materials with large and even ultra-large MOX grains when room-temperature MOX gas sensors with high humidity tolerance are being developed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. S.D. Bakrania, M.S. Wooldridge, The effects of two thick film deposition methods on tin dioxide gas sensor performance. Sensors 9, 6853–6868 (2009)10.3390/s90906853 ↗
2. G. Korotcenkov, Handbook of gas sensor materials: properties, advantages and shortcomings for applications (Springer Press, New York, 2013)10.1007/978-1-4614-7165-3 ↗
3. L. Boon-Brett, J. Bousek, G. Black et al., Identifying performance gaps in hydrogen safety sensor technology for automotive and stationary applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35, 373–384 (2010)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.10.064 ↗
4. M.E. Franke, T.J. Koplin, U. Simon, Metal and metal oxide nanoparticles in chemiresistors: does the nanoscale matter? Small 2, 36–50 (2006)10.1002/smll.200500261 ↗
5. R. Vander Wal, G. Hunter, J. Xu et al., Metal-oxide nanostructure and gas-sensing performance. Sens. Actuators B 138, 113–119 (2009)10.1016/j.snb.2009.02.020 ↗
6. G. Jimenez-Cadena, J. Riu, F.X. Rius, Gas sensors based on nanostructured materials. Analyst 132, 1083–1099 (2007)10.1039/b704562j ↗
7. X.R. Xu, M. Yin, N. Li et al., Vanadium-doped tin oxide porous nanofibers: enhanced responsivity for hydrogen detection. Talanta 167, 638–644 (2017)10.1016/j.talanta.2017.03.013 ↗
8. Y.K. Kim, S.-H. Hwang, S.M. Jeong et al., Colorimetric hydrogen gas sensor based on PdO/metal oxides hybrid nanoparticles. Talanta 188, 356–364 (2018)10.1016/j.talanta.2018.06.010 ↗
9. Y. Xiong, W.P. Chen, Y.S. Li et al., Contrasting room-temperature hydrogen sensing capabilities of Pt-SnO2 and Pt-TiO2 composite nanoceramics. Nano Res. 9, 3528–3535 (2016)10.1007/s12274-016-1229-0 ↗
10. S. Zhu, P.C. Li, G.T. Wu et al., Extraordinary room-temperature hydrogen sensing capabilities with high humidity tolerance of Pt-SnO2 composite nanoceramics prepared using SnO2 agglomerate powder. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 43, 21177–21185 (2018)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.120 ↗
11. C.B. Song, G.T. Wu, B.L. Sun et al., Pt-WO3 porous composite ceramics outstanding for sensing low concentrations of hydrogen in air at room temperature. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 6420–6424 (2017)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.101 ↗
12. W.P. Chen, Y. Xiong, Y.S. Li et al., Extraordinary room-temperature hydrogen sensing capabilities of porous bulk Pt–TiO2 nanocomposite ceramics. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41, 3307–3312 (2016)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.151 ↗
13. P.C. Li, Z.H. Xiong, S. Zhu et al., Singular room-temperature hydrogen sensing characteristics with ultrafast recovery of Pt-Nb2O5 porous composite ceramics. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 30186–30192 (2017)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.015 ↗
14. B. Pejcic, P. Eadington, A. Ross, Environmental monitoring of hydrocarbons: a chemical sensor perspective. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 6333–6342 (2007)10.1021/es0704535 ↗
15. G. Korotcenkov, Practical aspects in design of one-electrode semiconductor gas sensors: status report. Sens. Actuators B 121, 664–678 (2007)10.1016/j.snb.2006.04.092 ↗
16. K.-I. Choi, M. Huebner, A. Haensch et al., Ambivalent effect of Ni loading on gas sensing performance in SnO2 based gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B 183, 401–410 (2013)10.1016/j.snb.2013.04.007 ↗
17. F.E. Annanouch, Z. Haddi, S. Vallejos et al., Aerosol-assisted CVD-grown WO3 nanoneedles decorated with copper oxide nanoparticles for the selective and humidity-resilient detection of H2S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 7, 6842–6851 (2015)10.1021/acsami.5b00411 ↗
18. G. Korotcenkov, I. Blinov, V. Brinzari et al., Effect of air humidity on gas response of SnO2 thin film ozone sensors. Sens. Actuators B 122, 519–526 (2007)10.1016/j.snb.2006.06.025 ↗
19. K. Suematsu, N. Ma, M. Yuasa et al., Surface-modification of SnO2 nanoparticles by incorporation of Al for the detection of combustible gases in a humid atmosphere. RSC Adv. 5, 86347–86354 (2015)10.1039/C5RA17556A ↗
20. S. Gunji, M. Jukei, Y. Shimotsuma et al., Unexpected gas sensing properties of SiO2/SnO2 core-shell nanofibers under dry and humid conditions. J. Mater. Chem. C 5, 6369–6376 (2017)10.1039/C7TC01642E ↗
21. H.R. Kim, A. Haensch, I.D. Kim et al., The role of NiO doping in reducing the impact of humidity on the performance of SnO2-based gas sensors: synthesis strategies, and phenomenological and spectroscopic studies. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 4456–4463 (2011)10.1002/adfm.201101154 ↗
22. D. Koziej, N. Baˆrsan, U. Weimar et al., Water-oxygen interplay on tin dioxide surface: implication on gas sensing. Chem. Phys. Lett. 410, 321–323 (2005)10.1016/j.cplett.2005.05.107 ↗
23. A.M. Ruiz, X. Illa, R. Díaz et al., Analyses of the ammonia response of integrated gas sensors working in pulsed mode. Sens. Actuators B 118, 318–322 (2006)10.1016/j.snb.2006.04.057 ↗
24. S. Vallejos, S. Selina, F.E. Annanouch et al., Aerosol assisted chemical vapour deposition of gas sensitive SnO2 and Au-functionalised SnO2 nanorods via a non-catalysed vapour solid (VS) mechanism. Sci. Rep. 6, 28464 (2016)10.1038/srep28464 ↗
25. G. Heiland, D. Kohl, Physical and chemical aspects of oxidic semiconductor gas sensors. Chem Sensor Technol 1, 15–38 (1988)10.1016/B978-0-444-98901-7.50007-5 ↗
26. D. Patil, Y.-K. Seo, Y.K. Hwang et al., Humidity sensing properties of poly(o-anisidine)/WO3 composites. Sens. Actuators B 128, 374–382 (2008)10.1016/j.snb.2007.06.026 ↗
27. N. Yamazoe, K. Suematsu, K. Shimanoe, Two types of moisture effects on the receptor function of neat tin oxide gas sensor to oxygen. Sens. Actuators B 176, 443–452 (2013)10.1016/j.snb.2012.08.060 ↗
28. S. Harbeck, A. Szatvanyi, N. Barsan et al., DRIFT studies of thick film un-doped and Pd-doped SnO2 sensors: temperature changes effect and CO detection mechanism in the presence of water vapour. Thin Solid Films 436, 76–83 (2003)10.1016/S0040-6090(03)00512-1 ↗
29. R.G. Pavelko, H. Daly, C. Hardacre et al., Interaction of water, hydrogen and their mixtures with SnO2 based materials: the role of surface hydroxyl groups in detection mechanisms. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 2639–2647 (2010)10.1039/b921665k ↗
30. S. Zhu, Y. Liu, G.T. Wu et al., Mechanism study on extraordinary room-temperature CO sensing capabilities of Pd-SnO2 composite nanoceramics. Sens. Actuators B 285, 49–55 (2019)10.1016/j.snb.2019.01.027 ↗
31. J.-H. Smått, M. Lindén, T. Wagner et al., Micrometer-sized nanoporous tin dioxide spheres for gas sensing. Sens. Actuators B 155, 483–488 (2011)10.1016/j.snb.2010.12.051 ↗
32. J. Zhang, X.H. Liu, G. Neri et al., Nanostructured materials for room-temperature gas sensors. Adv. Mater. 28, 795–831 (2016)10.1002/adma.201503825 ↗