Laser ablation induced impulse study for removal of space debris mission using small satellite
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In recent years, many plans have arisen for building constellations in low Earth orbit, some of which have already provided commercial services. The number of satellites that form these constellations will exceed $$10^4$$, and a number of these could become space debris due to accidental failure, leading to serious problems for human activities in space. Laser ablation-induced propulsion achieved by remote irradiation from the service spacecraft has been proposed as one effective method to remove such space debris and it involves effectively generating a propulsion impulse from a laser. Because most of the high-power lasers currently utilized in space applications are Nd:YAG lasers, in this study, we evaluate the characteristics of second harmonic generation (SHG), which can be generated using nonlinear crystals. The momentum coupling coefficient may be dependent on the irradiated laser wave length which has a significant difference in the ablation process such as plasma generation and heating. These effects have been investigated using an impulse measurement instrumental setup with a KD*P nonlinear crystal. As an efficient impulse generation method, the irradiation of the fundamental and SHG beams of the Nd:YAG laser at the same point was found to be more effective than the fundamental beam with the same total energy. SHG does not require additional power-consuming equipment such as additional exciters or amplifiers, but requite temperature-controlled nonlinear crystals, and impulses can be increased with minimal additional power. It turned out to be advantageous for space applications, which will require minimum power operation . Additionally, we found an additional nonlinear laser-induced impulses through the interaction of the beams.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma · Space Satellite Systems and Control · Astro and Planetary Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. C. Phipps, M. Birkan, W. Bohn, H.-A. Eckel, H. Horisawa, T. Lippert, M. Michaelis, Y. Rezunkov, A. Sasoh, W. Schall, S. Scharring, J. Sinko, Review: laser-ablation propulsion. J. Propul. Power 26(4), 609–637 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.4373310.2514/1.43733 ↗
2. R.C. Wiens, S. Maurice, B. Barraclough, M. Saccoccio, W.C. Barkley, J.F. Bell, S. Bender, J. Bernardin, D. Blaney, J. Blank, M. Bouyé, N. Bridges, N. Bultman, P. Caïs, R.C. Clanton, B. Clark, S. Clegg, A. Cousin, D. Cremers, A. Cros, L. DeFlores, D. Delapp, R. Dingler, C. D’Uston, M. Darby Dyar, T. Elliott, D. Enemark, C. Fabre, M. Flores, O. Forni, O. Gasnault, T. Hale, C. Hays, K. Herkenhoff, E. Kan, L. Kirkland, D. Kouach, D. Landis, Y. Langevin, N. Lanza, F. LaRocca, J. Lasue, J. Latino, D. Limonadi, C. Lindensmith, C. Little, N. Mangold, G. Manhes, P. Mauchien, C. McKay, E. Miller, J. Mooney, R.V. Morris, L. Morrison, T. Nelson, H. Newsom, A. Ollila, M. Ott, L. Pares, R. Perez, F. Poitrasson, C. Provost, J.W. Reiter, T. Roberts, F. Romero, V. Sautter, S. Salazar, J.J. Simmonds, R. Stiglich, S. Storms, N. Striebig, J.-J. Thocaven, T. Trujillo, M. Ulibarri, D. Vaniman, N. Warner, R. Waterbury, R. Whitaker, J. Witt, B. Wong-Swanson, The chemcam instrument suite on the mars science laboratory (msl) rover: body unit and combined system tests. Space Sci. Rev. 170, 167–227 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-012-9902-410.1007/s11214-012-9902-4 ↗
3. J.L. Forshaw, G.S. Aglietti, N. Navarathinam, H. Kadhem, T. Salmon, A. Pisseloup, E. Joffre, T. Chabot, I. Retat, R. Axthelm, S. Barraclough, A. Ratcliffe, C. Bernal, F. Chaumette, A. Pollini, W.H. Steyn, RemoveDEBRIS: an in-orbit active debris removal demonstration mission. Acta Astronaut. 127, 448–463 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.06.01810.1016/j.actaastro.2016.06.018 ↗
4. T. Yamamoto, J. Matsumoto, H. Okamoto, R. Yoshida, C. Hoshino, K. Yamanaka, Pave the way for active debris removal realization: Jaxa commercial removal of debris demonstration (crd2). In: Flohrer, T., Lemmens, S., Schmitz, F. (eds.) Proceedings of 8th European Conference on Space Debris, vol. 8. the ESA Space Debris Office, Darmstadt, Germany (2021). ESA
5. W.O. Schall, Orbital debris removal by laser radiation. Acta Astronaut. 24, 343–351 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-5765(91)90184-7. (International Astronautical Federation Congress)10.1016/0094-5765(91)90184-7 ↗
6. E.B. Gietl, E.W. Gholdston, B.A. Manners, R.A. Delventhal, The electric power system of the international space station-a platform for power technology development. In: 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484), vol. 4, pp. 47–544 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2000.87836410.1109/AERO.2000.878364 ↗
7. T. Fukushima, D. Hirata, K. Adachi, Y. Itaya, J. Yamada, K. Tsuno, T. Ogawa, N. Saito, M. Sakashita, S. Wada, T. Ebisuzaki, End-of-life deorbit service with a pulsed laser onboard a small satellite. In: Flohrer, T., Lemmens, S., Schmitz, F. (eds.) Proceedings of 8th European Conference on Space Debris, vol. 8. the ESA Space Debris Office, Darmstadt, Germany (2021). ESA
8. K. Tsuno, S. Wada, T. Ogawa, T. Ebisuzaki, T. Fukushima, D. Hirata, J. Yamada, Y. Itaya, Impulse measurement of laser induced ablation in a vacuum. Opt. Express 28(18), 25723–25729 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.39911910.1364/OE.399119 ↗
9. C. Porneala, D.A. Willis, Time-resolved dynamics of nanosecond laser-induced phase explosion. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 42(15), 155503 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/42/15/15550310.1088/0022-3727/42/15/155503 ↗
10. H. Yuan, I.B. Gornushkin, A.B. Gojani, X.H. Wang, M.Z. Rong, Laser-induced plasma imaging for low-pressure detection. Opt. Express 26(12), 15962–15971 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.01596210.1364/OE.26.015962 ↗
11. H.E. Poole, J.W. Cox, R.H. Couch, W.H.F. Jr., A lidar technology experiment from space shuttle: lidar in-space technology experiment (LITE). In: Cruickshank, J.M., Harney, R.C. (eds.) Laser radar technology and applications I, Proc, of SPIE, vol. 0663, pp. 196–202 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.93867410.1117/12.938674 ↗
12. R.S. Afzal, Mars observer laser altimeter: laser transmitter. Appl. Opt. 33(15), 3184–3188 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.33.00318410.1364/AO.33.003184 ↗
13. H.Riris, X. Sun, J.F. Cavanaugh, L. Ramos-Izquierdo, P. Liiva, G.B. Jackson, S. Schmidt, J. McGarry, D.E., Smith, The lunar orbiter laser altimeter (lola) on nasa’s lunar reconnaissance orbiter (lro) mission. In: Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics/Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference and Photonic Applications Systems Technologies, p. 1 (2008)10.1364/CLEO.2009.CFJ1 ↗
14. A.W. Yu, M.A. Stephen, S.X. Li, G.B. Shaw, A. Seas, E. Dowdye, E. Troupaki, P. Liiva, D. Poulios, K. Mascetti, Space laser transmitter development for ICESat-2 mission. In: Clarkson, W.A., Hodgson, N., Shori, R.K. (eds.) Solid State Lasers XIX: Technology and Devices, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 7578, pp. 64–74 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.84334210.1117/12.843342 ↗
15. W.H. Hunt, D.M. Winker, M.A. Vaughan, K.A. Powell, P.L. Lucker, C. Weimer, Calipso lidar description and performance assessment. J. Atmos. Oceanic Tech. 26(7), 1214–1228 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1223.110.1175/2009JTECHA1223.1 ↗
16. A.G. Straume-Lindner, Aeolus sensor and product description. Technical Report AE-SU-ESA-GS-000, ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands (Oct. 2018)
17. J.P. do Carmo, G. de Villele, K. Wallace, A. Lefebvre, K. Ghose, T. Kanitz, F. Chassat, B. Corselle, T. Belhadj, P. Bravetti (2021) Atmospheric lidar (atlid): Pre-launch testing and calibration of the european space agency instrument that will measure aerosols and thin clouds in the atmosphere. Atmosphere. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos1201007610.3390/atmos12010076 ↗
18. B.C. D’Souza, Development of impulse measurement techniques for the investigation of transient forces due to laser-induced ablation. PhD thesis, Faculty of the Graduate School, University of Southern California (May 2007)
19. H. Tsuruta, B. Wang, Z. Wang, S. Yokota, A. Sasoh, Repetitive pulse performance of one-micrometer laser-ablation propulsion onto aluminum. J. Propul. Power 30(6), 1485–1489 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B3528810.2514/1.B35288 ↗
20. I. Vlădoiu, M. Stafe, C. Neguţu, I.M. Popescu, Nanopulsed ablation rate of metals dependence on the laser fluence and wavelength in atmospheric air. University Politechnica of Bucharest Scientific Buletin, Series A 70(4) (2008)
21. M. Stafe, I. Vladoiu, I. Popescu, Impact of the lasr wavelength and fluence on the ablation rate of aluminium. Open Phys. 6(2), 327–331 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11534-008-0026-010.2478/s11534-008-0026-0 ↗
22. M. Bass, (ed.): Properties of Metals in Handbook of Optics Device, Measurements & Properties Second Ed.: Volume II. MacGrow-Hill, New York (2000). Chap. 35
23. X. Li, Y. Guan, Theoretical fundamentals of short pulse laser-metal interaction: a review. Nanotechnol. Precis. Eng. 3(3), 105–125 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npe.2020.08.00110.1016/j.npe.2020.08.001 ↗
24. M.H.A. Shaim, H.E. Elsayed-Ali, Characterization of laser-generated aluminum plasma using ion time-of-flight and optical emission spectroscopy. J. Appl. Phys. 122, 203301 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.499547710.1063/1.4995477 ↗
25. A. Sunahara, Initial process of laser-plasma interaction in the extreme ultra-violet light source and the inertial confinement fusion plasmas. J. Plasma Fusion Res. 89(6), 416–422 (2013)