journal article·2024-01

Investigation of electrical, dielectric, and relaxation metrics of SrFe12O19/Fe3O4 hexaferrite composites

Manisha Thakur, Charanjeet Singh, R. B. Jotania, A. K. Srivastava, I. A. Abdel-Latif

Applied Physics A· Volume 130· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, composites were prepared from La–Co-doped strontium ferrite (SrFe12O19) and soft magnetite (Fe3O4) in a 1:5 weight ratio, spanning a range of substitutions from z = 0.0 to 0.5. The X-ray diffraction analysis of all prepared composites revealed the co-existence of hard (M-type) and soft (spinel) ferrite phases. Notably, in z = 0.0 (20% Fe3O4 of SrFe12O19) a minor trace of (alpha)-Fe2O4 was observed. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) micrographs displayed distinct particles of M-type and spinel ferrite at z = 0.0, and substitution rendered a change in grain/grain size distribution. Composition z = 0.4 exhibited the highest dielectric constant, which can be correlated with the maximum grain boundary capacitance Cgb (29.77 (mathrm{mu F})) calculated from impedance spectroscopy software. In contrast, z = 0.3 revealed the maximum conductivity relaxation and explained through the dense/closely packed grains observed in micrographs. The replacement of Fe3+ ions with Co–La ions caused a reduction in conductivity value and was maximum for z = 0.4 (3.26 × 10–5 Ω−1 m−1) in the high-frequency region. A segment of a semicircular arc had been observed in all synthesized composites in (Zprimeprime) vs. (Zprime) Cole–Cole plots. This observation indicated a significant enhancement in dielectric relaxation brought about by the Co–La substitution.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Multiferroics and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. M. Zareef Khan, H. Abbas, K. Nadeem, A. Iqbal, I.L. Papst, Concentration dependent exchange coupling in BaFe12O19/NiFe2O4 nanocomposites. J. Alloys Compd. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16610510.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166105 ↗
2. V. Bilovol, M. Sikora, K. Berent, Exchange coupling in SrFe12O19/CoFe2O4 composites: effect of component proportions. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.17038410.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170384 ↗
3. R.B. Jotania, R.A. Nandotaria, C.C. Chauhan, M. Hashim, S. Singh Meena, S.E. Shirsath, Structural phases and Maxwell-Wagner relaxation in magnetically soft-ZnFe2O4 and hard-Sr2Cu2Fe12O22 nanocomposites”. Ceram. Int. 42(2), 2289–2298 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.10.02310.1016/j.ceramint.2015.10.023 ↗
4. S.A. Mathews, D.R. Babu, Role of exchange coupling between the hard and soft magnetic phases on the absorption of microwaves by SrFe10Al2O19/Co0.6Zn0.4Fe2O4 nanocomposite. Ceram. Int. 48(6), 7533–7549 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.29710.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.297 ↗
5. N.A. Algarou, Y. Slimani, M. Almessiere, I. Ercan, P. Kogerler, Exchange-coupling effect in hard/soft SrTb0.01Tm0.01Fe11.98O19/AFe2O4 (where A = Co, Ni, Zn, Cu and Mn) composites. Ceram. Int. 46(6), 7089–7098 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.20110.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.201 ↗
6. Y.F. Xu, Y.Q. Ma, S.T. Xu, F.L. Zan, G.H. Zheng, Z.X. Dai, Obtainment of exchange coupling coefficient of Ni0.6Zn 0.4Fe2O4/SrFe12O19 composites. Mater. Lett. 131, 203–205 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.05.18710.1016/j.matlet.2014.05.187 ↗
7. T. Dippong, E.A. Levei, I.G. Deac, I. Petean, O. Cadar, Dependence of structural, morphological and magnetic properties of manganese ferrite on Ni-Mn Substitution. Int. J. Mol. Sci. (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2306309710.3390/ijms23063097 ↗
8. T. Dippong, E.A. Levei, C. Leostean, O. Cadar, Impact of annealing temperature and ferrite content embedded in SiO2 matrix on the structure, morphology and magnetic characteristics of (Co0.4Mn0.6Fe2O4)δ (SiO2)100-δ nanocomposites. J. Alloys Compd. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.15920310.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159203 ↗
9. S.V. Trukhanov, A. Trukhanov, L. Panina, I. Kazakevich, A. Balagurov, Structure and magnetic properties of BaFe11.9In0.1O19hexaferrite in a wide temperature range. J. Alloys Compd. 689, 383–393 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.30910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.309 ↗
10. A.V. Trukhanov, V. Kostishyn, L. Panina, Y. Yang, L. Matzui, E. Trukhanova, S. Trkhanov, Control of electromagnetic properties in substituted M-type hexagonal ferrites. J. Alloys Compd. 754, 247–256 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.15010.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.150 ↗
11. L.Y. Matzui, A. Trukhanov, O. Yakovenko, K. Astapovich, D. Karpinsky, S. Trukhanov, Functional magnetic composites based on hexaferrites: Correlation of the composition, magnetic and high-frequency properties. Nanomaterials (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano912172010.3390/nano9121720 ↗
12. T. Dippong, I.G. Deac, O. Cadar, E.A. Levei, Effect of silica embedding on the structure, morphology and magnetic behavior of (Zn0.6mn0.4fe2o4)δ/(sio2)(100−δ) nanoparticles. Nanomaterials (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1109223210.3390/nano11092232 ↗
13. M.A. Almessiere, Y. Slimani, N. Algarou, M. Gondal, V. Kostishin, I. Ercan, Electronic, magnetic, and microwave properties of hard/soft nanocomposites based on hexaferrite SrNi0.02Zr0.02Fe11.96O19 with variable spinel phase MFe2O4 (M = Mn Co, Cu, and Zn). Ceram. Int. 47(24), 35209–35223 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.06410.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.064 ↗
14. C. Zhang, X. Liu, K.M.U. Rehman, C. Liu, H. Li, X. Meng, Structural and properties of hydrothermally synthesised M-type hexaferrites. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 28(6), 4593–4597 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-6096-710.1007/s10854-016-6096-7 ↗
15. N.H. Sulaiman, M.J. Ghazali, J. Yunas, A. Rajabi, B.Y. Majlis, M. Razali, Synthesis and characterization of CaFe2O4 nanoparticles via co-precipitation and auto-combustion methods. Ceram. Int. 44(1), 46–50 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.20310.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.203 ↗
16. R. Joshi, C. Singh, D. Kaur, H. Zaki, R. Jotania, P. Dhruv, M. Ghimire, Structural and magnetic properties of Co2+-W4+ions doped M-type Ba-Sr hexaferrites synthesized by a ceramic method. J. Alloys Compd. 695, 909–914 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.19210.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.192 ↗
17. Y. Yang, X. Liu, “Synthesis and magnetic properties of Sr0.65-xCaxLa0.35Fe11.32Co0.28O18.435 hexaferrites prepared by solid-state reaction method. IEEE Trans. Magn. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2014.232022110.1109/TMAG.2014.2320221 ↗
18. D.A. Vinnik, D. Klygach, V. Zhivulin, V. Atuchin, S. Trukhanov, A. Trukhanov, Electromagnetic properties of BaFe12O19: Ti at centimeter wavelengths. J. Alloys Compd. 755, 177–183 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.31510.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.315 ↗
19. Y. Ebrahimi, A.A. Sabbagh, A. Sarabi, H. Sameie, R. Salimi, S. Moosakhani, A comprehensive study on the magnetic properties of nanocrystalline SrCo 0.2Fe 11.8O 19 ceramics synthesized via diverse routes. Ceram. Int. 38(5), 3885–3892 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.01.04010.1016/j.ceramint.2012.01.040 ↗
20. T. Dippong, E.L. Andrea, O. Cadar, M. Lazar, G. Borodi, I. Petean, Effect of amorphous SiO2 matrix on structural and magnetic properties of Cu0.6Co0.4Fe2O4/SiO2 nanocomposites. J. Alloys Compd. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15669510.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156695 ↗
21. T. Dippong, E.A. Levei, O. Cadar, Investigation of structural, morphological and magnetic properties of MFe2O4 (M = Co, Ni, Zn, Cu, Mn) obtained by thermal decomposition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2315848310.3390/ijms23158483 ↗
22. S.F. Mansour, O.M. Hemeda, M.A. Abdo, W.A. Nada, Improvement on the magnetic and dielectric behavior of hard/soft ferrite nanocomposites. J. Mol. Struct. 1152, 207–214 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2017.09.08910.1016/j.molstruc.2017.09.089 ↗
23. C.C. Chauhan, T. Gupta, S. Meena, C. Sandhu, R. Jotania, Tailoring magnetic and dielectric properties of SrFe12O19/NiFe2O4 ferrite nanocomposites synthesized in presence of Calotropis gigantea (crown) flower extract. J. Alloys Compd. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16341510.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163415 ↗
24. P. Kaur, S.B. Narang, S. Bahel, Investigation of electromagnetic properties of La-doped strontium ferrite in X and Ku bands. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 30(8), 2239–2245 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-017-4024-610.1007/s10948-017-4024-6 ↗
25. H. Mahajan, S.K. Godara, A.K. Srivastava, Synthesis and investigation of structural, morphological, and magnetic properties of the manganese doped cobalt-zinc spinel ferrite. J. Alloys Compd. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16296610.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162966 ↗
26. A.L. Guerrero-Serrano, M. Mirabal-García, S.A. Palomares-Sánchez, Synthesis and study of the lanthanum substitution in the lead M-type hexaferrite. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 27(7), 1709–1713 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-014-2489-010.1007/s10948-014-2489-0 ↗
27. G. Feng, W. Zhou, Y. Qing, Z. Huang, Y. Zhou, Lanthanum-substituted Ba0.4Ca0.6Fe11.4Co0.6O19 ceramics with enhanced microwave absorption. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 31(1), 621–627 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-02567-410.1007/s10854-019-02567-4 ↗
28. M. Augustin, T. Balu, Estimation of lattice stress and strain in zinc and manganese ferrite nanoparticles by Williamson-hall and size-strain plot methods. Int. J. Nanosci. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219581X1650035610.1142/S0219581X16500356 ↗
29. M.J. Iqbal, S. Farooq, Enhancement of electrical resistivity of Sr0.5Ba0.5Fe12O19 nanomaterials by doping with lanthanum and nickel. Mater. Chem. Phys. 118(2–3), 308–313 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.07.05610.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.07.056 ↗
30. F. Mohseni, R.C. Pullar, J.M. Vieira, J.S. Amaral, Enhancement of maximum energy product in exchange-coupled BaFe12O19/Fe3O4 core-shell-like nanocomposites. J. Alloys Compd. 806, 120–126 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.16210.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.162 ↗
31. M.A. Almessiere, Y. Slimani, A. Baykal, Structural, morphological and magnetic properties of hard/soft SrFe12-xVxO19/(Ni0.5Mn0.5Fe2O4)y nanocomposites: Effect of vanadium substitution. J. Alloys Compd. 767, 966–975 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.21210.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.212 ↗
32. X. Shen, F. Song, J. Xiang, M. Liu, Y. Zhu, Y. Wang, Shape anisotropy, exchange-coupling interaction and microwave absorption of hard/soft nanocomposite ferrite microfibers. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 95(12), 3863–3870 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05375.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05375.x ↗
33. V. Harikrishnan, R. Ezhil Vizhi, A study on the extent of exchange coupling between (Ba0.5Sr0.5Fe12O19)1–x(CoFe2O4)x magnetic nanocomposites synthesized by solgel combustion method”. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 418, 217–223 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.03.03710.1016/j.jmmm.2016.03.037 ↗
34. J. Ji, S. Zhang, C. Cao, H. Zhang, Z. Liu, C. Jin, Structural and magnetic properties of SrFe12O19/CoFe2O4 composites with exchange coupling interaction. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.17007310.1016/j.jmmm.2022.170073 ↗
35. L. Wang, C. Yang, L. Zhang, H. Li, The exchange coupling interaction in CoFe2O4/Fe3O4 hard and soft magnetic nanocomposites. Vacuum (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.10975110.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109751 ↗
36. M.Z. Khan, I.H. Gul, F. Javaid, A. Ali, S. Hafeez, M.M. Baig, Synthesis and characterization of Zr4+-Y3+ substituted Ba-Sr hexaferrite nanoparticles for microwave absorption and electromagnetic shielding applications. Mater. Res. Bull. 168, 112468 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2023.11246810.1016/j.materresbull.2023.112468 ↗
37. C.G. Koops, On the dispersion of resistivity and dielectric constant of some semiconductors at audiofrequencies. Phys. Rev. (1951). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.83.12110.1103/physrev.83.121 ↗
38. H. Malik, M.A. Khan, A. Hussain, M.F. Warsi, A. Mahmood, S.M. Ramay, Structural, spectral, thermal and dielectric properties of Nd-Ni co-doped Sr-Ba-Cu hexagonal ferrites synthesized via sol-gel auto-combustion route. Ceram. Int. 44(1), 605–612 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.21910.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.219 ↗
39. B.H. Bhat, B. Want, Magnetic, dielectric and complex impedance properties of lanthanum and magnesium substituted strontium hexaferrite. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 27(12), 12582–12590 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5389-110.1007/s10854-016-5389-1 ↗
40. W. Zhang, J. Li, J. Li, J. Guo, P. Li, Structural, optical, dielectric, and magnetic properties of Sr07.La0.3Zn0.3Fe11.7–xAlxO19 hexaferrite synthesized by the solid-state reaction method. J. Solid State Chem. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2021.12276610.1016/j.jssc.2021.122766 ↗
41. R. Nongjai, S. Khan, K. Asokan, H. Ahmed, I. Khan, Magnetic and electrical properties of in doped cobalt ferrite nanoparticles. J. Appl. Phys. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.475943610.1063/1.4759436 ↗
42. K. Funke, Jump relaxation in solid electrolytes. Progr Solid State Chem. (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6786(93)90002-910.1016/0079-6786(93)90002-9 ↗
43. I.A. Auwal, H. Erdemi, H. Sözeri, H. Güngüneş, A. Baykal, Magnetic and dielectric properties of Bi3+ substituted SrFe12O19 hexaferrite. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 412, 69–82 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.03.06610.1016/j.jmmm.2016.03.066 ↗
44. I.A. Auwal, B. Unal, A. Bakyal, U. Kurtan, M. Amir, M. Sertkol, Electrical and Dielectric Properties of Y3+-Substituted Barium Hexaferrites. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 30(7), 1813–1826 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-017-3978-810.1007/s10948-017-3978-8 ↗
45. A.K. Pradhan, T.K. Nath, S. Saha, Impedance spectroscopy and electric modulus behavior of molybdenum doped cobalt-zinc ferrite. Mater Res Express. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aa7c8c10.1088/2053-1591/aa7c8c ↗
46. G.R. Gajula, L.R. Buddiga, K.N. Chidambara Kumar, M. Dasari, Study on electric modulus, complex modulus and conductivity properties of Nb/Sm, Gd doped barium titanate-lithium ferrite ceramic composites. Results Phys (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.10307610.1016/j.rinp.2020.103076 ↗
47. R. Ranjan, R. Kumar, N. Kumar, B. Behera, R.N.P. Choudhary, Impedance and electric modulus analysis of Sm-modified Pb(Zr 0.55Ti0.45)1–x/4O3 ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 509(22), 6388–6394 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.03.00310.1016/j.jallcom.2011.03.003 ↗
48. T.A. Alrebdi, I.Y. Khalil, J. Mohammed, Y. Wudil, H. Hafeez, A.K. Srivastava, Phase structure refinement, electric modulus spectroscopy, Urbach energy analysis, and magnetic properties of Ce3+–Ni2+-substituted Y-type barium hexaferrites. Mater Sci Eng B Solid State Mater Adv Technol (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2022.11568210.1016/j.mseb.2022.115682 ↗
49. L.A. Ramajo, A.A. Cristóbal, P.M. Botta, J.M. Porto López, M.M. Reboredo, M.S. Castro, Dielectric and magnetic response of Fe3O4/epoxy composites”. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 40(4), 388–393 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.017 ↗
50. A.S. Das, D. Biswas, Investigation of Ac conductivity mechanism and dielectric relaxation of semiconducting neodymium-vanadate nanocomposites: Temperature and frequency dependency. Mater Res Express. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab13ee10.1088/2053-1591/ab13ee ↗
51. Q. Zhu, R. Tang, H. Zhou, Y. Wang, S. Xu, H. Yang, Impedance spectroscopy and conduction mechanism of magnetoelectric hexaferrite BaFe10.2.Sc.1.8O19. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 102(7), 4038–4047 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.1627510.1111/jace.16275 ↗
52. M. Nasri, C. Henchiri, R. Dhahri, J. Khelifi, M. Berber, Structural, dielectric, electrical and modulus spectroscopic characteristics of CoFeCuO4 spinel ferrite nanoparticles. Mater Sci Eng B Solid State Mater Adv Technol. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2021.11533110.1016/j.mseb.2021.115331 ↗
53. K.M. Batoo, S. Kumar, C.G. Lee, Study of ac impedance spectroscopy of Al doped MnFe2–2xAl2xO4. J. Alloys Compd. 480(2), 596–602 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.01.13710.1016/j.jallcom.2009.01.137 ↗
54. R.H. Cole, Relaxation processes in dielectrics. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 66(S2), 13–20 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.103066050610.1002/jcp.1030660506 ↗
55. M.T. Rahman, C.V. Ramana, Impedance spectroscopic characterization of gadolinium substituted cobalt ferrite ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.489694510.1063/1.4896945 ↗
56. K. Dhabekar, K. Mohan Kant, Soft/hard ferrite nanocomposites: evaluation of temperature dependent dielectric properties. Physica B Condens Matter. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2021.41358110.1016/j.physb.2021.413581 ↗
57. N.A. Algarou, Y. Slimani, M. Almessiere, A.V. Trukhanov, A. Baykal, Developing the magnetic, dielectric and anticandidal characteristics of SrFe12O19/(Mg0.5Cd0.5Dy0.03Fe1.97O4)x hard/soft ferrite nanocomposites. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 113, 344–362 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2020.07.02210.1016/j.jtice.2020.07.022 ↗
58. A. Hilczer, K. Kowalska, E. Markiewicz, A. Pietraszko, B. Andrzejewski, Dielectric and magnetic response of SrFe12O19-CoFe2O4 composites obtained by solid state reaction. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 207, 47–55 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2016.02.00310.1016/j.mseb.2016.02.003 ↗