journal article·2020-09

Highly efficient thermo-electrochemical energy harvesting from graphene–carbon nanotube ‘hybrid’ aerogels

Sanju Gupta, Romney Meek

Applied Physics A· Volume 126· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Three-dimensional scaffold assemblies consisting of thermally reduced graphene oxide nanosheets and small-diameter carbon nanotubes were synthesized as potential ‘all carbon’ thermo-electrochemical energy harvesters. The facile hydrothermal–solvothermal synthesis route in which organic wet chemistry used was to inter crosslink the well-dispersed graphene oxide nanosheets with carbon nanotubes followed by freeze-drying to produce monolithic aerogel networks with ultralow densities, tunable mesoscopic pore sizes, tailorable functionality and morphology. They exhibited high electrical conductivity due to multiplex topologies owing to the integration with carbon nanotubes, which has high density of states at van Hove singularities, accompanied by expected larger surface area and sufficient edge plane sites, which in-turn enhance surface adsorption and rapid ion transportation. We conducted thermoelectric and thermo-electrochemical power generation from these ‘hybrid’ aerogel materials and using two different designs of galvanic thermo-cells. Consequently, higher Seebeck (electronic; Se as well as ionic; Sion) coefficients and thermopower generation was measured that confirmed low thermal responsiveness attributed to smaller domain size generated by hierarchical mesoporosity and open network. These multiple features demonstrate significant potential of these novel electrodes in galvanic thermocells for low-grade thermal energy harvester with higher relative conversion efficiency.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. J.P. Hall, E.J. Bain, Energy-storage technologies and electricity generation. Energy Policy 36, 4352–4355 (2008)10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.037 ↗
2. K. Biswas, J. He, I.D. Blum, C.I. Wu, T.P. Hogan, D.N. Seidman, V.P. Dravid, M.G. Kanatzidis, High-performance bulk thermoelectrics with all-scale hierarchical architectures. Nature 489, 414–418 (2012). (and references therein)10.1038/nature11439 ↗
3. M.S. Romano, S. Gambhir, J.M. Razal, A. Getos, G.G. Wallace, J. Chen, Novel carbon materials for thermal energy harvesting. J. Therm. Anal. Carorim. 109, 1229 (2012)10.1007/s10973-012-2311-9 ↗
4. T.I. Quickenden, Y. Mua, The power conversion efficiencies of a thermogalvanic cell operated in three different orientations. J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, 3652 (1995)10.1149/1.2048394 ↗
5. S.K. Ratkje, T. Ikeshoji, K. Syverud, Heat and internal energy changes at electrodes and junctions in thermocells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 2088 (1990)10.1149/1.2086890 ↗
6. The Future of Geothermal Energy; MIT-led interdisciplinary panel; Massachusetts Institute of technology (2006)
7. Innovative Energy Systems Challenges; Funding Opportunity Number DE-PS36-06G096009; U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, DC, 10/20/2005
8. R. Hu, B.A. Cola, N. Haram, J.N. Barisci, S. Lee, S. Stoughton, G. Wallace, C. Too, M. Thomas, A. Gestos, M.E. Dela Cruz, J.P. Ferraris, A.A. Zakhidov, R.H. Baughman, Harvesting waste thermal energy using a carbon-nanotube-based thermo-electrochemical cell. Nano Lett. 10, 838–846 (2010)10.1021/nl903267n ↗
9. L. Noam, Energy resources and use: the present (2008) situation and possible sustainable paths to the future. Energy 132, 21009–21015 (2010)
10. C.B. Vinning, An inconvenient truth about thermoelectrics. Nat. Mater. 8, 83–85 (2009)10.1038/nmat2361 ↗
11. T. Mori, S. Priya, Materials for energy harvesting: at the forefront of a new wave. MRS Bull. 40, 176–180 (2018)10.1557/mrs.2018.32 ↗
12. R.A. Kishore, S. Priya, A review on low-grade thermal energy harvesting: materials, methods and devices. Materials 11, 1433-1–1445 (2018)10.3390/ma11081433 ↗
13. S.W. Angrist, Direct Energy Conversion (Allyn and Bacon, Boson, 1965)
14. A.F. Ioffe, Semiconductor thermoelements and thermoelectric cooling (Info-search, London, 1957)
15. H.S. Kim, W. Liu, G. Chen, C.-W. Chu, Z. Ren, Relationship between thermoelectric figure of merit and energy conversion efficiency. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 112, 8205–8210 (2015)10.1073/pnas.1510231112 ↗
16. CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics, Introduction, Edited by D.M.Rowe, CRC Press (1995)
17. G.J. Snyder, T. Ursell, Thermoelectric efficiency and compatibility. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 148301–148304 (2003)10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.148301 ↗
18. L.M. Cowen, J. Arroyo, M.J. Carnie, D. Baran, B.C. Schroeder, Review-organic materials for thermoelectric energy generation. ECS J Sol. Stat. Sci Technol. 6, N3080–N3088 (2017)10.1149/2.0121703jss ↗
19. K.K. Jung, Y. Jung, C.J. Choi, J.M. Lee, J.S. Ko, Flexible thermoelectric generator with polydimethyl siloxane in thermoelectric material and substrate. Curr. Appl. Phys. 16, 1442–1448 (2016)10.1016/j.cap.2016.08.010 ↗
20. T.M. Tritt, H. Bottner, L. Chen, Thermoelectrics: direct solar thermal energy conversion. MRS Bull. 33, 366–368 (2008)10.1557/mrs2008.73 ↗
21. A.H. Kazim, A.S. Booeshaghi, S.T. Stephens, B.A. Cola, Thermo-electrochemical generator: energy harvesting and thermoregulation for liquid cooling applications. Sustain Energy Fuels 1, 1381–1389 (2017)10.1039/C7SE00161D ↗
22. K. Kawata, T. Oya, Development and evaluation of “thermoelectric power-generating paper” using carbon nanotube-composite paper. Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 56, 06GE10-1–15 (2017)10.7567/JJAP.56.06GE10 ↗
23. H.G. Hertz, S.K. Ratkje, Theory of thermocells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 136, 1698–1704 (1989)10.1149/1.2096995 ↗
24. B. Zhang, J. Zhang, X. Sang, C. Liu, T. Luo, L. Peng, B. Han, X. Tan, X. Ma, D. Wang, N. Zhao, Cellular graphene aerogel combines ultralow weight and high mechanical strength: a highly efficient reactor for catalytic hydrogenation. Sci. Rep. 6(25830), 1–10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2583010.1038/srep25830 ↗
25. R. Goncalves, T. Ikeshoji, Comparative studies of a thermoelectric converter by a thermogalvanic cell with a mixture of concentrated potassium ferrocyanide and potassium ferricyanide aqueous solutions at great temperature differences. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 3, 2631 (2010)
26. D. Zhao, Waste thermal energy harvesting from a conversion-driven Rijke-Zhao thermo-acoustic-piezo system. Energy Convers. Manage. 66, 87–97 (2013)10.1016/j.enconman.2012.09.025 ↗
27. T. Hirai, K. Shindo, T. Ogata, Charge and discharge characteristics of thermo-chargeable galvanic cells with an [Fe(CN)6]4-/[Fe(CN)6]3- redox couple. J. Electrochem. Soc. 143, 1305–1313 (1996)10.1149/1.1836635 ↗
28. Y. Mua, T.I. Quickenden, Power conversion efficiency, electrode separation, and overpotential in the ferricyanide/ferrocyanide thermogalvanic cell. J. Electrochem. Soc. 143, 2558–2564 (1996)10.1149/1.1837047 ↗
29. S. Gupta, E. Heintzman, C. Price, Electrostatic layer-by-layer self-assembled graphene/multi-walled carbon nanotubes hybrid multilayers as efficient ‘all carbon’ supercapacitors. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 16, 4771–4782 (2016). (and references therein)10.1166/jnn.2016.12413 ↗
30. S. Gupta, R. Meek, B. Evans, A. Henson, Interplay of topologically interconnected mesoporous network and defects number density in improving electroactivity of graphene-single-walled carbon nanotube aerogels. J. Appl. Phys. 125, 174301-1–174307 (2019)
31. S. Gupta, S.B. Carrizosa, B. McDonald, N. Dimakis, Graphene-family nanomaterials assembled with cobalt oxides and cobalt nanoparticles as hybrid supercapacitive electrodes and enzymeless glucose detection platforms. J. Mater. Res. 32, 301–322 (2017)10.1557/jmr.2016.484 ↗
32. S. Gupta, A. Henson, B. Evans, R. Meek, Graphene-based aerogels with carbon nanotubes as ultrahigh-performing mesoporous capacitive deionization electrodes for brackish and seawater desalination. J. Water Desalin. Treat. (2019). https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.2433810.5004/dwt.2019.24338 ↗
33. K. Bradley, S.H. Jhi, P.G. Collins, J. Hone, M.L. Cohen, A. Zettl, A.G. Rinzler, R.E. Smalley, Is the intrinsic thermoelectric power of carbon nanotubes positive? Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 14361–14443 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4361 ↗
34. T. Yamamoto, H. Fukuyama, Possible high thermoelectric power in semiconducting carbon nanotubes ~a case study of doped one-dimensional semiconductors. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87, 024707–25111 (2018)10.7566/JPSJ.87.024707 ↗
35. J. Blackburn, A.J. Ferguson, C. Cho, J.C. Grunlan, Carbon-nanotube-based thermoelectric materials and devices. Adv. Mater. 30, 17043861–17043935 (2018)
36. S. Chandrasekaran, P.G. Campbell, T.F. Baumann, M.A. Worsley, Carbon aerogel evolution: Allotrope, graphene-inspired and 3D-printed aerogels. J. Mare. Res. 32, 4166–4185 (2017)
37. J. Zou, J. Liu, A.S. Karakoti, A. Kumar, D. Joung, Q. Li, S.I. Khondaker, S. Seal, L. Zhai, Ultralight multiwalled carbon nanotube aerogel. ACS Nano 4, 7293–7302 (2010)10.1021/nn102246a ↗
38. M.S. Romano, S. Gambir, J.M. Razal, A. Gestos, G.G. Wallace, J. Chen, Novel carbon materials for thermal energy harvesting. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 109, 1229–1235 (2012)10.1007/s10973-012-2311-9 ↗
39. H. Im, T. Kim, H. Song, J. Choi, J.S. Park, R.O. Robles, H.D. Yang, K.D. Kihm, R.H. Baughman, H.H. Lee, T.J. Kang, Y.H. Kim, High-efficiency electrochemical thermal energy harvester using carbon nanotube aerogel sheet electrodes. Nat. Commun. 7, 10600 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/comms1060010.1038/comms10600 ↗
40. K. Hu, X. Xie, T. Szkopek, M. Cerruti, Understanding hydrothermally reduced graphene oxide hydrogels: from reaction products to hydrogel properties. Chem. Mater. 28, 1756–1768 (2016)10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04713 ↗
41. A.C. Ferrari, D.M. Basko, Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 235–246 (2013)10.1038/nnano.2013.46 ↗
42. S. Gupta, E. Heintzman, J. Jasinski, Multiphonon Raman spectroscopy properties and Raman mapping of 2D van der Waals solids: graphene and beyond. J. Raman Spectrosc. 46, 217–230 (2015)10.1002/jrs.4609 ↗
43. Z. Fan, D.Z.Y. Tng, C.X.T. Lim, P. Liu, S.T. Nguyen, P. Xiao, A. Marconnet, C.Y.H. Lim, H.M. Duong, Thermal and electrical properties of graphene/carbon nanotube aerogels. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects. 445, 48–53 (2014)10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.12.083 ↗
44. M. Park, S.J. Hong, K.H. Kim, H. Kang, M. Lee, D.H. Jeong, Y.W. Park, B.H. Kim, Electrical and thermoelectric transport by variable range hopping in reduced graphene oxide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 173103-1–173104 (2017)
45. Y. Xie, S. Xu, Z. Xu, H. Wu, C. Deng, X. Wang, Interface-mediated extremely low thermal conductivity of graphene aerogel. Carbon 98, 381–390 (2016)10.1016/j.carbon.2015.11.033 ↗
46. A. Piazza, F. Giannazzo, G. Buscarino, G. Fisichella, A.L. Magna, F. Roccaforte, M. Cannas, F.M. Gelardi, S. Agnello, Graphene p-type doping and stability by thermal treatments in molecular oxygen-controlled atmosphere. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 22718–22723 (2015)10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07301 ↗
47. R.C. Progelhof, J.L. Throne, R.R. Ruetsch, Methods for predicting the thermal conductivity of composite systems: a review. Polym. Eng. Sci. 16, 615–625 (1976)10.1002/pen.760160905 ↗
48. M. Park, B.A. Cola, T. Siegmund, J. Xu, M.R. Maschmann, T.S. Fisher, H. Kim, Effects of a carbon nanotube layer on electrical contact resistance between copper substrates. Nanotechnology 17, 2294–2303 (2006)10.1088/0957-4484/17/9/038 ↗