Effect of laser fluence on the size of copper oxide nanoparticles produced by the ablation of Cu target in double distilled water
Source abstract
Abstract
Copper oxide nanoparticles produced in double distilled water at room temperature by laser ablation of the Cu target have been investigated using TEM, SEM, AFM, X-ray diffraction, photo-spectrometry and PIXE. Q-switched Nd:YAG laser operating at 1064 nm with a pulse duration of 5–6 ns was used to conduct the experiments in the fluence range of 5.73–9.87 J/cm2. In each experiment, 12,000 laser pulses were used to ablate the target placed in double distilled water. Different diagnostic techniques reveal that the nanoparticles have a size between 2–55 nm and their mean size as well as the width of particle distribution increases with the laser fluence. Since no surface active material (surfactant) was added to water, the nanoparticles aggregated and settled down at the bottom of the container within a week. In addition to stable Cu2O, the XRD spectrum also shows the presence of suboxide Cu64O in the colloidal solution of nanoparticles produced in the present study.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles · Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies · Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. D. Mott, J. Galkowski, L. Wang, J. Luo, C.J. Zhong, Langmuir 23, 5740 (2007)10.1021/la0635092 ↗
2. R.K. Swarnkar, S.C. Singh, R. Gopal, Paper presented at the International Conference on Optics and Photonics, Chandigarh, India, 30 Oct–1 Nov 2009
3. G. Ren, D. Hu, E.W. Cheng, M.A. Vargas-Reus, P. Reip, R.P. Allaker, Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 33, 587 (2009)10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.12.004 ↗
4. A. Kruusing, Handbook of Liquids-Assisted Laser Processing (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007)
5. J. Perriere, E. Millon, E. Fogarassy, Recent Advances in Laser Processing of Materials (Elsevier, London, 2006)
6. R.K. Swarnkar, S.C. Singh, R. Gopal, Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Nanostructured Materials and Nanocomposites, Kottayam, India, 6–8 April 2009
7. F. Mafune, J. Kohno, Y. Takeda, T. Kondow, J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 5114 (2001)10.1021/jp0037091 ↗
8. R. Guan, H. Hashimoto, K.H. Kuo, Acta Crystallogr. B 40, 560 (1984)10.1107/S010876818400269X ↗
9. R. Guan, H. Hashimoto, K.H. Kuo, Acta Crystallogr. B 41, 219 (1985)10.1107/S0108768185002026 ↗
10. G.W. Yang, Prog. Mater. Sci. 52, 648 (2007)10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.10.016 ↗
11. A.K. Ali, Dissertation, University of Technology, Baghdad, 2010
12. N.V. Taranseko, A.V. Butsen, E.A. Nevar, N.A. Savastenko, Appl. Surf. Sci. 252, 4439 (2006)10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.07.150 ↗
13. I. Lisiecki I, M.P. Pileni, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 3887 (1993)10.1021/ja00063a006 ↗
14. K. Amikura, T. Kimura, M. Hamada, N. Yokoyama, J. Miyazaki, Y. Yamada, Appl. Surf. Sci. 254, 6976 (2008)10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.05.091 ↗
15. R.M. Tilaki, A.I. Zad, S.M. Mahdavi, J. Nanopart. Res. 9, 853 (2007)10.1007/s11051-006-9143-0 ↗
16. R.M. Tilaki, A.I. Zad, S.M. Mahdavi, Appl. Phys. A 84, 215 (2006)10.1007/s00339-006-3604-2 ↗