Potentialities of XRF and EIS portable instruments for the characterisation of ancient artefacts
Source abstract
Abstract
Non-destructive testing methods are very important tools for conservators and art historians to obtain valuable information about works of art without causing any or even local damage to them. Two successful case studies showing the noticeable potentialities of two analytical portable instruments employed in the characterisation of tangible cultural heritage are shown. The first example concerns the chemical characterisation via an X-ray fluorescence (XRF) portable instrument of the red decorative pigment and of the stone surface of the Capestrano Warrior (Archaeological Museum of Chieti, Italy), which is considered the most important Italic stone statue found in Italy. The second concerns the use of a portable electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurement system for the characterisation of the protective effectiveness of the paints on the railing of Palazzo Reale in Torino, Italy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Conservation Techniques and Studies · Building materials and conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. E. Angelini, G.M. Ingo, F. Rosalbino, T. De Caro, S. Grassini, Metall. Ital. 7–8, 9 (2003)
2. G. Moretti, Il Guerriero Italico di Capestrano (, Rome, 1936)
3. L. Mariani, L’Aufidena, in Monumenti Antichi dei Lincei, vol. 10 (, 1901), col. 225
4. V. Cianfarani, Antiche Civiltà d’Abruzzo (, Rome, 1969)
5. P.F. Stary, Zur Eisenzeitlichen Bewaffnung und Kampfweise in Mittel-Italien (, Mainz, 1981)
6. R. Salvia del Rosario, Necropoli archaiche d’Abruzzo: la necropoli di Capestrano. In Papers in Italian Archaeology IV: part iii, Patterns in Protohistory (B.A.R. Int. Ser. 245) (Cambridge, 1985)
7. G. Paternoster, R. Rinzivillo, F. Nunziata, E.M. Castellucci, C. Lofrumento, J. Cult. Herit. 6, 21 (2005)10.1016/j.culher.2004.10.003 ↗
8. A. Longoni, C. Fiorini, P. Leutenneger, G. Fronterotta, L. Struder, P. Lechner, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 409, 407 (1998)10.1016/S0168-9002(98)00113-2 ↗
9. A.G. Karydas, D. Kotzamani, R. Bernard, J.N. Barrandon, C. Zarkadas, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 226, 15 (2004)10.1016/j.nimb.2004.02.034 ↗
10. G. Cultrone, G. Barone, G. Cangemi, S. Ioppolo, J. Cult. Herit. 2, 199 (2001)10.1016/S1296-2074(01)01123-2 ↗
11. W.J. Lorenz, F. Mansfeld, in Fundamental Aspects of Corrosion Protection by Surface Modification, ed. by E. McCafferty, C.R. Clayton, J. Oudar (Proc. Ser. PV 84-3) (The Electrochemical Society, Pennington, NJ, 1984), p. 144
12. C. Price, D. Hallam, G. Heath, D. Creagh, J. Ashton, An electrochemical study of waxes for bronze sculpture. In Metal95 – International Conference on Metal Conservation, Semur en Auxois, France, 25–28 September 1995, ed. by I.D. MacLeod, S.L. Pennec, L. Robbiola (James & James, , 1997), pp. 233–241
13. L.A. Ellingson, T. Shedlosky, G.P. Bierwagen, E.R. de la Rie, L.B. Brostoff, Stud. Conserv. 49, 53 (2004)10.1179/sic.2004.49.1.53 ↗
14. L.B. Brostoff, E.R. de la Rie, Research into protective coating system for outdoor bronze sculpture and ornamentation. In Metal95 – International Conference on Metal Conservation, Semur en Auxois, France, 25–28 September 1995, ed. by I.D. MacLeod, S.L. Pennec, L. Robbiola (James & James, , 1997), pp. 242–244
15. A. Carullo, F. Ferraris, M. Parvis, E. Vallan, E. Angelini, P. Spinelli, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 49, 371 (2000)10.1109/19.843080 ↗