X-ray attenuation characterisation of electrospun Bi2O3/PVA and WO3/PVA nanofibre mats as potential X-ray shielding materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrospun nanoparticles (Bi2O3 or WO3) filler/PVA nanofibre mats with different filler loadings (0–40 wt%) were successfully fabricated for X-ray shielding purpose via an electrospinning process. The X-ray attenuation ability of the prepared electrospun filler/PVA nanofibre mats were compared at various X-ray energies (8.64–25.20 keV) using X-ray fluorescent (XRF) unit. The dispersion of nanoparticles filler within PVA nanofibre mat was observed using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results indicate that the X-ray attenuation ability of the filler/PVA nanofibre mats increased with the increment of filler loading excluded 40 wt% Bi2O3/PVA nanofibre mats. Nevertheless, the outcome shows that the electrospun Bi2O3/PVA nanofibre mat has higher X-ray attenuation ability than WO3/PVA nanofibre mat for all filler loadings. Moreover, only 10 wt% of Bi2O3 loading is needed in order to achieve similar X-ray attenuation ability as 40 wt% WO3/PVA nanofibre mats. Poor particle dispersion can be observed for ≥ 35 wt% Bi2O3/PVA compared to the WO3/PVA nanofibre mats.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. B.G. Bennett, Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 36, 237–242 (1991)10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a081004 ↗
2. W. Huda, J.V. Atherton, D.E. Ware, Radiology 203(2), 417–422 (1997)10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114097 ↗
3. M.P. Hiorns, A. Saini, P.J. Marsden, Br. J. Radiol. 79, 326–330 (2006)10.1259/bjr/36530782 ↗
4. H. Fares, I. Jlassi, H. Elhouichet, M. Ferid, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 396–307, 1–7 (2014)10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.04.012 ↗
5. L.W. Klein, D.L. Miller, S. Balter, W. Laskey, D. Haines, A. Norbash, M.A. Mauro, J.A. Goldstein, Radiology 250, 538–544 (2009)10.1148/radiol.2502082558 ↗
6. M.I. Sayyed, S.I. Qashou, Z.Y. Khattari, J. Alloy. Compd. 696, 632–638 (2017)10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.160 ↗
7. A.K. Singh, R.K. Singh, B. Sharma, A.K. Tyagi, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 138, 9–15 (2017)10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.04.016 ↗
8. N.Z. Noor Azman, A.S. Salim, J.H. Hazim, I.M. Low, J. Synchrotron. Radiat. 20, 741–748 (2013)10.1107/S0909049513017871 ↗
9. K.J. Singh, S. Kaur, R.S. Kaundal, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 96, 153–157 (2014)10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.09.015 ↗
10. L.D. Tijing, Y.C. Woo, M. Yao, J. Ren, H.K. Shon, in Comprehensive Membrane Science and Engineering, ed. by E. Drioli, L. Giorno, E. Fontananova. Electrospinning for Membrane Fabrication: Strategies and Applications, Chap 1.16, vol 1, 2nd edn. (Oxford, Elsevier, 2017), pp. 418–44410.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.12262-0 ↗
11. S. Gautam, A.K. Dinda, N.C. Mishra, Mater. Sci. Eng. C 33(3), 1228–1235 (2013)10.1016/j.msec.2012.12.015 ↗
12. X. Zhang, K. Tang, X. Zheng, J. Bionic Eng. 13(1), 143–149 (2016)10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60168-2 ↗
13. L.A. Mercante, V.P. Scagion, F.L. Migliorini, L.H.C. Mattoso, D.S. Correa, Trends Anal. Chem. 91, 91–103 (2017)10.1016/j.trac.2017.04.004 ↗
14. U. Dashdorj, M.K. Reyes, A.R. Unnithan, A.P. Tiwari, B. Tumurbaatar, C.H. Park, C.S. Kim, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 80, 1–7 (2015)10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.06.026 ↗
15. F. El Haber, G. Froyer, J. Univ. Chem. Technol. Metall. 43, 283–290 (2008)
16. B. Shanshan, S.H. Jayaram, E.A. Cherney, Annual report conference on electrical insulation and dielectric phenomena (CEIDP), 1–4, (2010)
17. E.M. Çelikbilek, A.E. Ersundu, M.I. Sayyed, G. Lakshminarayana, S. Aydin, J. Alloy. Compd. 714, 278–286 (2017)10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.223 ↗
18. A. Akhavan, F. Khoylou, E. Ataeivarjovi, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 138, 49–53 (2017)10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.02.057 ↗
19. C.C. DeMerlis, D.R. Schoneker, Food Chem. Toxicol. 41, 319–326 (2003)10.1016/S0278-6915(02)00258-2 ↗
20. A. Koski, K. Yim, S. Shivkumar, Mater. Lett. 58, 493–497 (2004)10.1016/S0167-577X(03)00532-9 ↗
21. S.G. Gholap, J.P. Jog, M.V. Badiger, Polymer 45, 5863–5873 (2004)10.1016/j.polymer.2004.06.032 ↗
22. P. Supaphol, S. Chuangchote, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 108(2), 969–978 (2008)10.1002/app.27664 ↗
23. S.O. Shamsan, M.I. Sayyed, D.K. Gaikwad, P.P. Pravina, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 148, 86–94 (2018)10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.02.026 ↗
24. N.Z. Noor Azman, A.S. Salim, I.M. Low, Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process 110(1), 137–144 (2013)10.1007/s00339-012-7464-7 ↗
25. N. Chanthima, J. Kaewkhao, Ann. Nucl. Energy 55, 23–28 (2013)10.1016/j.anucene.2012.12.011 ↗
26. P. Sprawls, in The Physical Principles of Medical Imaging, 2nd edn. (Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, Wisconsin, 1995). ISBN. 0-944838-54-5
27. K. Kirdsiri, J. Kaewkhao, N. Chanthima, P. Limsuwan, Ann. Nucl. Energy 38, 1438–1441 (2011)10.1016/j.anucene.2011.01.031 ↗