journal article·2018-08-28Open access

Manganese Ore Decomposition and Carbon Reduction in Steelmaking

Wei Wu, Peng Wang, Lu Lin, Shi-fan Dai

Abstract

Abstract To improve the direct alloying of manganese ore in steelmaking, the decomposition and carbon reduction of manganese ore was studied using a differential thermal analyzer and resistance furnace. The remaining material after manganese ore decomposition at 1,600 °C was a mixture of 43 % MnO, 40 % MnSiO 3 and FeO, and 17 % MnSiO 3 . The remaining material after the carbon reduction of the manganese ore was a mixture of metal (30.8 % Mn 7 C 3 and 16.1 % FeC 3 ) and slag (2.5 % FeO, 5.1 % SiO 2 , and 18.8 % MnO). The high-temperature (1,200 ℃) decomposition and reduction of manganese ore produce manganese carbonate, manganese dioxide, and manganese salicylate sesquioxide. However, because it is not easy to decompose the manganese silicate in the manganese ore, the proportion of ore being reduced by carbon is small. Therefore, the increase of the manganese reduction of manganese silicate is critical to the direct alloying of manganese ore. Adding calcium oxide or magnesium oxide to the manganese ore improves the reduction of manganese ore, whereas adding slag from the initial stage or endpoint of the converter process has little effect on the manganese ore reduction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Metal Extraction and Bioleaching · Iron and Steelmaking Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Metallurgical Technology Research , Central Iron and Steel Research Institute , Beijing 100081 , China

The State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy Foundation (Wuhan University of Science and Technology) , Wuhan 430081 , China

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. C.H. Eom, S.H. Lee, J.G. Park, J.H. Park and D.J. Min, ISIJ Int., 56(1) (2016) 37–43.10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2015-24310.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2015-243 ↗
2. Y. Fujii, Y. Nakai, Y.I. Uchida and Y.J. Miki, Tetsu-to-Hagane, 101(10) (2015) 524–529.10.2355/tetsutohagane.TETSU-2015-03010.2355/tetsutohagane.TETSU-2015-030 ↗
3. R.S. Braga, C. Takano and M.B. Mourao, Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 34(4) (2007) 279–284.10.1179/174328107X15534910.1179/174328107X155349 ↗
4. Y.B. Gao, H.G. Kim, H.Y. Sohn and C.W. Kim, ISIJ Int., 52(5) (2012) 759–763.10.2355/isijinternational.52.75910.2355/isijinternational.52.759 ↗
5. O.A. Ei Hady, A.E. Amer, I.S. Ei Mahallawi and Y.S. Shash, Mater. Sci. Forum, 561 (2007) 85–89.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.561-565.85 ↗
6. J. Safarian, Ø. Grong, L. Kolbeinsen and S.E. Olsen, ISIJ Int., 46(8) (2006) 1120–1129.10.2355/isijinternational.46.112010.2355/isijinternational.46.1120 ↗
7. O.M. Karla and S. Dieter, Steel Res. Int., 79(11) (2008) 811–816.10.1002/srin.20080620310.1002/srin.200806203 ↗
8. C.H. Eom and D.J. Min, Met. Mater. Int., 22(1) (2016) 129–135.10.1007/s12540-015-5419-110.1007/s12540-015-5419-1 ↗
9. D.Y. Kim and S.M. Jung, ISIJ Int., 56(1) (2016) 71–77.10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2015-50710.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2015-507 ↗
10. R. Kononov, O. Ostrovski and S. Ganguly, Trans. B, 39B(10) (2008) 662–668.10.1007/s11663-008-9191-1 ↗
11. K. Turkoa, D. Slizovskiy and M. Tangstad, ISIJ Int., 54(6) (2014) 1204–1208.10.2355/isijinternational.54.120410.2355/isijinternational.54.1204 ↗
12. P.P. Lazarevskii, Y.E. Romaneko, I.D. Rozhikhina and O.I. Nokhrina, Steel in Translation, 45(5) (2015) 367–370.10.3103/S096709121505007110.3103/S0967091215050071 ↗
13. T. Shimoo, S. Ando and H. Kimura, J. Japan Inst. Metals, 48(3) (1984) 285–292.10.2320/jinstmet1952.48.3_28510.2320/jinstmet1952.48.3_285 ↗
14. T. Takaoka, I. SUMl, Y. Kikuchi and Y. Kawai, ISIJ Int., 33(1) (1993) 98–103.10.2355/isijinternational.33.9810.2355/isijinternational.33.98 ↗
15. J.C. Li, Ferro-Alloys, 23(6) (1996) 6–10.10.1053/jhep.1996.v23.pm0008675154 ↗