Engineering the residual stress state and microstructure of stainless steel with mechanical surface treatments
Source abstract
Abstract
Four mechanical surface treatments have been considered for the application to austenitic stainless steel structures. Shot peening (SP), laser shock peening (LSP), ultrasonic impact treatment (UIT) and water jet cavitation peening (WJCP), also known as cavitation shotless peening (CSP), have been applied to 8 mm thick Type 304 austenitic stainless steel coupons. This study considers the merits of each of these mechanical surface treatments in terms of their effect on the surface roughness, microstructure, level of plastic work and through thickness residual stress distribution. Microstructural studies have revealed the formation of martensite close to the treated surface for each process. Residual stress measurements in the samples show compressive stresses to a significantly greater depth for the LSP, UIT and WJCP samples compared to the more conventional SP treated sample. © Springer-Verlag 2010.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Erosion and Abrasive Machining · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. H. Gray, L. Wagner, G. Lütjering, in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Shot peening (ICSP-3), Garmish-Partenhirchen, Germany, ed. by H. Wohlfahrt, R. Kopp, O. Vöhringer (DGM Info. Verlag, Oberusel, 1987), pp. 447–458
2. S. Curtis, E.R. de los Rios, C.A. Rodopoulos, A. Levers, Int. J. Fatigue 25(1), 59–66 (2003)10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00049-X ↗
3. J.E. Masse, Surf. Coat. Technol. 70, 231–234 (1995)10.1016/0257-8972(95)80020-4 ↗
4. E. Statnikov, Ultrasonics 44, 533–538 (2006)10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.119 ↗
5. H. Soyama, J.D. Park, M. Saka, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 122, 83–89 (2000)10.1115/1.538911 ↗
6. H. Soyama, K. Saito, M. Saka, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 124, 135–139 (2002)10.1115/1.1447926 ↗
7. H. Soyama, T. Kusaka, M. Saka, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 20, 1263–1265 (2001)10.1023/A:1010947528358 ↗
8. W.Z. Zhuang, G.R. Halford, Int. J. Fatigue 23, S31–S37 (2001)10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00132-3 ↗
9. L. Huo, D. Wang, Y. Zhang, Int. J. Fatigue 27, 95–101 (2005)10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.05.009 ↗
10. A. King, A. Steuwer, C. Woodward, P.J. Withers, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 435–436, 12–18 (2006)10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.020 ↗
11. B.N. Mordyuk, Yu.V. Milman, M.O. Iefimov, G.I. Prokopenko, V.V. Silberschmidt, M.I. Danylenko, A.V. Kotko, Surf. Coat. Technol. 202, 4875–4883 (2008)10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.04.080 ↗
12. Y. Sano, M. Obata, T. Kubo, N. Mukai, M. Yoda, K. Masaki, Y. Ochi, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 417, 334–340 (2006)10.1016/j.msea.2005.11.017 ↗
13. T. Pirling, G. Bruno, P.J. Withers, Mater. Sci. Eng. 437A, 139–144 (2006)10.1016/j.msea.2006.04.083 ↗
14. A. Sato, Y. Sunaga, T. Mori, Acta Metall. 25, 627 (1976)10.1016/0001-6160(77)90004-9 ↗
15. S.K. Varma, J. Kalyanam, L.E. Murr, V. Shrinivas, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 13, 107–111 (1994)10.1007/BF00416816 ↗
16. I. Nikitin, B. Scholtes, H.J. Maier, I. Altenberger, Scr. Mater. 50, 1345–1350 (2004)10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.02.012 ↗
17. B.N. Mordyuk, Yu.V. Milman, M.O. Iefimov, G.I. Prokopenko, V.V. Silberschmidt, M.I. Danylenko, A.V. Kotko, Surf. Coat. Technol. 202(19), 4875–4883 (2008)10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.04.080 ↗
18. S.S.M. Tavaresa, J.M. Pardal, M.J. Gomes da Silvab, H.F.G. Abreub, M.R. da Silvac, Mater. Charact. 60, 907–911 (2009)10.1016/j.matchar.2009.02.001 ↗
19. C. García, F. Martín, P. De Tiedra, J.A. Heredero, M.L. Aparicio, Corros. Sci. 43, 1519–1539 (2001)10.1016/S0010-938X(00)00165-7 ↗
20. M. Turski, P.J. Bouchard, A. Steuwer, P.J. Withers, Acta Mater. 56, 3598–3612 (2008)10.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.045 ↗