Simulation of random packing of spherical particles with different size distributions
Source abstract
Abstract
A numerical model for a loose packing process of spherical particles is presented. The simulation model starts with randomly choosing a sphere according to a pre-generated continuous particle-size distribution, and then dropping the sphere into a dimension-specified box, and obtaining its final position by using dropping and rolling rules which are derived from similar physical process of spheres dropping in the gravitational field to minimize its gravity potential. Effects of three different particle-size distributions on the packing structure were investigated. Analysis on the physical background of the powder-based manufacturing process is additionally applied to produce optimal packing parameters of bimodal and Gaussian distributions to improve the quality of the fabricated parts. The results showed that higher packing density can be obtained using bimodal size distribution with particle-size ratio from 1.5 to 2.0 and the mixture composition around n2:n1=6:4. For particle size with a Gaussian distribution, the particle radii should be limited in a narrow range around 0.67 to 1.5.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Granular flow and fluidized beds · Polysaccharides Composition and Applications · Planetary Science and Exploration
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. W.M. Visscher, M. Bolsterli, Nature 329, 504–507 (1972)10.1038/239504a0 ↗
2. P.N. Pusey, in Liquids, Freezing, and the Glass Transition, ed. by J.P. Hansen, D. Levesque, J. Zinn-Justin (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991)
3. R. Zallen, The Physics of Amorphous Solids (Wiley, New York, 1983)10.1002/3527602798 ↗
4. P. Meakin, A.T. Skjettorp, Adv. Phys. 42, 1–127 (1993)10.1080/00018739300101464 ↗
5. J.D. Bernal, J. Mason, Nature 188, 910–911 (1960)10.1038/188910a0 ↗
6. L.H.S. Roblee, R.M. Baird, J.W. Tierney, AIChE J. 4, 460–464 (1958)10.1002/aic.690040415 ↗
7. J.-P. Kruth, in Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium for Electromachining, Lausanne, 1995, pp. 3–28
8. M. Agarwala, D. Bourell, J. Beaman, H. Marcus, J. Barlow, Rapid Prototyp. J. 1, 26–36 (1995)10.1108/13552549510078113 ↗
9. S. Das, J. Beaman, M. Wohlert, D. Bourell, Rapid Prototyp. J. 4, 112–117 (1998)10.1108/13552549810222939 ↗
10. N.K. Tolochko, S.E. Mozzharov, I.A. Yadroitsev, T. Laoui, L. Froyen, V.I. Titov, M.B. Ignatiev, Rapid Prototyp. J. 10, 78–87 (2004)10.1108/13552540410526953 ↗
11. D.E. Bunnell, PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 1995
12. T. Manzur, T. Demaria, W. Chen, C. Roychoudhuri, in SPIE Photonics West Conference, San Jose, CA, 1996
13. P. Fischer, V. Romano, H.P. Weber, N.P. Karapatis, E. Boillat, R. Glardon, Acta Mater. 51, 1651–1662 (2003)10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00567-0 ↗
14. G.D. Scott, D.M. Kilgour, J. Phys. D 2, 863 (1969)10.1088/0022-3727/2/6/311 ↗
15. J.L. Finney, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 319, 479 (1970)10.1098/rspa.1970.0189 ↗
16. J. Moscinski, M. Bargie, Z.A. Rycerz, P.W.M. Jacobs, Mol. Simul. 3, 201–212 (1989)10.1080/08927028908031373 ↗
17. W.S. Jodrey, E.M. Tory, Powder Technol. 30, 111–118 (1981)10.1016/0032-5910(81)80003-4 ↗
18. W.S. Jodrey, E.M. Tory, Phys. Rev. A 32, 2347–2351 (1985)10.1103/PhysRevA.32.2347 ↗
19. E.M. Tory, B.H. Church, M.K. Tam, M. Ratner, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 51, 484–493 (1973)10.1002/cjce.5450510414 ↗
20. W.S. Jodrey, E.M. Tory, Simulation 32, 1–12 (1979)10.1177/003754977903200102 ↗
21. K.D.L. Kristiansen, A. Wouterse, A. Philipse, Physica A 358, 249–262 (2005)10.1016/j.physa.2005.03.057 ↗
22. M.N. Rahaman, Ceramic Processing and Sintering (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1995)