journal article·2004-05

Quasiparticle energies, excitonic effects and optical absorption spectra of small-diameter single-walled carbon nanotubes

C.D. Spataru, S. Ismail-Beigi, L.X. Benedict, S.G. Louie

Applied Physics A· Volume 78· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

We present a first-principles study of the effects of many-electron interactions on the optical properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Motivated by recent experiments, we have carried out ab initio calculations on the single-walled carbon nanotubes (3, 3), (5, 0) and (8, 0). The calculations are based on a many-body Green’s function approach in which both the quasiparticle (single-particle) excitation spectrum and the optical (electron–hole excitation) spectrum are determined. We show that the optical spectrum of both the semiconducting and metallic nanotubes studied exhibits important excitonic effects due to their quasi-one-dimensional nature. Binding energies for excitonic states range from zero for the metallic (5, 0) tube to nearly 1 eV for the semiconducting (8, 0) tube. Moreover, the metallic (3, 3) tube possesses exciton states bound by nearly 100 meV. Our calculated spectra explain quantitatively the observed features found in the measured spectra.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Fullerene Chemistry and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Z.M. Li, Z.K. Tang, H.J. Liu, N. Wang, C.T. Chan, R. Saito, S. Okada, G.D. Li, J.S. Chen, N. Nagasawa, S. Tsuda: Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 127 401 (2001)10.1016/S0375-9601(01)00612-0 ↗
2. M.J. O’Connell, S.M. Bachilo, C.B. Huffman, V.C. Moore, M.S. Strano, E.H. Haroz, K.L. Rialon, P.J. Boul, W.H. Noon, C. Kittrell, J. Ma, R.H. Hauge, R.B. Weisman, R.E. Smalley: Science 297, 593 (2002)10.1126/science.1072631 ↗
3. S.M. Bachilo, M.S. Strano, C. Kittrell, R.H. Hauge, R.E. Smalley, R.B. Weisman: Science 298, 2361 (2002)10.1126/science.1078727 ↗
4. T. Ando: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66, 1066 (1996)10.1143/JPSJ.66.1066 ↗
5. J.A. Misewich, R. Martel, Ph. Avouris, J.C. Tsang, S. Heinze, J. Tersoff: Science 300, 783 (2003)10.1126/science.1081294 ↗
6. M. Rohlfing, S.G. Louie: Phys. Rev. B 62, 4927 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevB.62.4927 ↗
7. W. Kohn, L.J. Sham: Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965)10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
8. M.S. Hybertsen, S.G. Louie: Phys. Rev. B 34, 5390 (1986)10.1103/PhysRevB.34.5390 ↗
9. L. Hedin: Phys. Rev. 139, A796 (1965)10.1103/PhysRev.139.A796 ↗
10. G. Strinati: Phys. Rev. B 29, 5718 (1984)10.1103/PhysRevB.29.5718 ↗
11. N. Troullier, J.L. Martins: Phys. Rev. 43, 1993 (1991)10.1103/PhysRevB.43.1993 ↗
12. L. Kleinman, D.M. Bylander: Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1425 (1982)10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1425 ↗
13. X. Blase, L.X. Benedict, E.L. Shirley, S.G. Louie: Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 1878 (1994)10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1878 ↗
14. S.G. Louie: in Topics in Computational Materials Science, ed. by C.Y. Fong (World Scientific, Singapore 1997) p. 9610.1142/9789812817006_0003 ↗
15. H. Ajiki, T. Ando: Physica B 201, 349 (1994)10.1016/0921-4526(94)91112-6 ↗
16. R. Saito, M. Fujita, G. Dresselhaus, M.S. Dresselhaus: Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 2204 (1992)10.1063/1.107080 ↗
17. N. Hamada, S.I. Sawada, A. Oshiyama: Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1579 (1992)10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1579 ↗
18. Z.H. Levine, S.G. Louie: Phys. Rev. B 25, 6310 (1982)10.1103/PhysRevB.25.6310 ↗
19. H.J. Liu, C.T. Chan: Phys. Rev. B 66, 115 416 (2002)
20. M. Machon, S. Reich, C. Thomsen, D. Sanchez-Portal, P. Ordejon: Phys. Rev. B 66, 155 410 (2002)10.1103/PhysRevB.66.155410 ↗
21. A.G. Marinopoulos, L. Reining, A. Rubio, N. Vast: Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 046 402 (2003)10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.046402 ↗
22. The calculation for the (8, 0) tube (with 32 atoms in the unit cell) was already very challenging on modern supercomputers. We are currently studying the (4, 2) tube, which has 56 atoms in the unit cell, but this is a far more difficult calculation (our calculations scale as the number of atoms to the fourth power)
23. R. Loudon: Am. J. Phys. 27, 649 (1959)10.1119/1.1934950 ↗
24. U. Fano: Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961)10.1103/PhysRev.124.1866 ↗
25. R.B. Weisman, S.M. Bachilo: Nano Lett. 3, 1235 (2003)10.1021/nl034428i ↗
26. M. Ichida, S. Mizuno, Y. Tani, Y. Saito, A. Nakamura: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 68, 3131 (1999)10.1143/JPSJ.68.3131 ↗
27. X. Liu, T. Pichler, M. Knupfer, M.S. Golden, J. Fink, H. Kataura, Y. Achiba: Phys. Rev. B 66, 045 411 (2002)
28. C.L. Kane, E.J. Mele: Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 207 401 (2003)