One-dimensional variable range charge carrier hopping in polyaniline–tungsten oxide nanocomposite-based hydrazine chemiresistor
Source abstract
Abstract
Low-temperature direct current charge transport mechanism of charge carriers in polyaniline–tungsten oxide (PAN-WO3) nanocomposite has been investigated. Charge transport in pristine PAN was found to govern by Mott’s three-dimensional variable range hopping (3-D VRH) model. However, the inclusion of WO3 in nanocomposite shifts the dimension of hopping from 3-D to 1-D. The room-temperature conductivity of PAN-WO3 nanocomposite (5.55 × 10–3 S/cm) was also found to be enhanced compared to pristine PAN (1.27 × 10–5 S/cm). The reasons for crossover in hopping dimensionality and enhanced conductivity of PAN-WO3 nanocomposite have been explained in terms of Mott’s parameters, i.e., small hopping radius, lower hopping energy, high inter-chain distance, and prominent intra-chain transport. Furthermore, PAN-WO3 exhibited enhanced reversible sensing behaviour (27%) towards 10 parts per million of hydrazine at room temperature compared to that of pristine PAN (12%). Enhanced sensing characteristics of PAN-WO3 nanocomposite can be attributed to its higher conductivity and prominent intra-chain unidirectional charge transport. Present communication opens a new window for energy-saving, eco-friendly, cost-effective, recoverable and reproducible, easily processable and efficient PAN-WO3 nanocomposite-based hydrazine detecting device.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. V. Chaudhary, A. Kaur, RSC Adv. 5, 73535 (2015)10.1039/C5RA08275G ↗
2. R. Bahru, M.F.M.A. Zamri et al., J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 31, 1574–1584 (2020)10.1007/s10854-019-02674-2 ↗
3. P. Jisha, M.S. Suma et al., J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 32, 11243–11263 (2021)10.1007/s10854-021-05794-w ↗
4. V. Chaudhary, A. Royal et al., Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 6, 8 (2021)10.1007/s41204-021-00102-7 ↗
5. Y. Cao, A.E. Kovalev, R. Xiao, J. Kim, T.S. Mayer, T.E. Mallouk, Nano Lett. 8, 4563 (2008)
6. S. Amlathe, V.K. Gupta, Analyst 113, 1481 (1988)10.1039/an9881301481 ↗
7. S. Peng, M.T. Sheldon, W. Liu, A.J. Botero, W.A. Goddard III., H.A. Atwater, Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 023102 (2015)10.1063/1.4905593 ↗
8. G. Choudhary, H. Hansen, Chemosphere 37, 801 (1998)10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00088-5 ↗
9. S. Virji, J. Huang, R.B. Kaner, B.H. Weiller, Nano Lett. 4(3), 491 (2004)10.1021/nl035122e ↗
10. S. Virji, R.B. Kaner, B.H. Weiller, Chem. Mater. 17(5), 1256 (2005)10.1021/cm0484091 ↗
11. S. Shukla, S. Chaudhary, A. Umar, G.R. Chaudhary, S.K. Mehta, Sens. Actuators B 196, 231 (2014)10.1016/j.snb.2014.02.016 ↗
12. K.P. Sambaevam, S. Mohamad, S.W. Phang, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 33, 24 (2015)10.1016/j.mssp.2015.01.008 ↗
13. A. Safavi, Talanta 58, 785 (2002)10.1016/S0039-9140(02)00362-4 ↗
14. A. Umar, M. Abaker, M. Faisal, S.W. Hwang, S. Baskoutas, S.A. Al-Sayari, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 11, 3474 (2011)10.1166/jnn.2011.4148 ↗
15. H.R. Zare, N. Nasirizadeh, Electrochim. Acta 52, 4153 (2007)10.1016/j.electacta.2006.11.037 ↗
16. L. Zheng, J. Song, Sens. Actuators B 135, 650 (2009)10.1016/j.snb.2008.09.035 ↗
17. J. Zhang, J. Tu, G. Du, Z. Dong, Y. Wu, L. Chang, D. Xie, G. Cai, X. Wang, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 114, 31 (2013)10.1016/j.solmat.2013.02.025 ↗
18. A.B. Puthirath, S.M. Raman, S.J. Varma, S. Jayalekshmi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 161901 (2016)10.1063/1.4947083 ↗
19. H.P. Klug, L.E. Alexander, X-Ray Diffraction Procedures (Wiley, New York, 1974)
20. S. Bhadra, D. Khastgir, Polym. Gegrad. Stab. 92, 1824 (2007)10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.07.004 ↗
21. K. Dutta, S.K. De, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 40, 734 (2007)10.1088/0022-3727/40/3/007 ↗
22. R. Singh, R.P. Tandon, S. Chandra, J. Appl. Phys. 70, 243 (1991)10.1063/1.350318 ↗
23. R. Pal, S.L. Goyal, V. Gupta, I. Rawal, ChemistrySelect 4, 9194 (2019)10.1002/slct.201901199 ↗
24. K.P. Maity et al., J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 53, 125303 (2020)10.1088/1361-6463/ab5f18 ↗
25. V. Chaudhary, H. Singh et al., Polym. Int 66, 699–704 (2017)10.1002/pi.5311 ↗
26. N.F. Mott, E.A. Davis, Electronic Processes in Non-Crystalline Materials, 2nd edn. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1979)
27. V. Chaudhary, Polymer-Plastics Technology and Materials. https://doi.org/10.1080/25740881.2021.1912095.10.1080/25740881.2021.1912095 ↗
28. T.A. Skothim, R. Elenbaumer, J.R. Reynolds, Handbook of Conducting Polymers (Dekker, New York, 1998)
29. C.S.S. Sangeeth, P. Jiménez, A.M. Benito, W.K. Maser, R. Menon, J. Appl. Phys. 107, 103719 (2010)10.1063/1.3374628 ↗
30. Z.H. Wang, H.H.S. Javadi, A. Ray, A.G. MacDarmid, A.J. Epstein, Phys. Rev. B 42, 5411 (1990)10.1103/PhysRevB.42.5411 ↗
31. A. Singh, A. Joshi, S. Samanta, A.K. Debnath, D.K. Aswal, S.K. Gupta, J.V. Yakhmi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 202106 (2009)10.1063/1.3266525 ↗
32. S. Mridha, D. Basak, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 142111 (2008)10.1063/1.2898399 ↗
33. C. B. Lim, J. B. Yu, D. Y. Kim, H. G. Byun, D. K. Lee, and J. S. Huh, IEEE Sensors, 695 (2006).
34. L. Jiang, H. Jun, Y. Hoh, J. Lim, D. Lee, J. Huh, Sensors and Actuators B 105, 132 (2005)10.1016/j.snb.2003.12.077 ↗
35. V. Chaudhary, A. Kaur, Polym. Int. 64, 1475 (2015)10.1002/pi.4944 ↗
36. V. Chaudhary, A. Kaur, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 26, 143 (2015)10.1016/j.jiec.2014.11.026 ↗