Nanoporous adsorbents for hydrogen storage
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Hydrogen storage in absorbents as activated carbons has been rarely investigated; however, about 25 years ago, the development of new nanomaterials, initiated by Iijima’s discovery of carbon microtubules, started new hopes. Unfortunately, initial results on high hydrogen uptake in carbon nanotubes at ambient conditions could not be independently reproduced; however, at cryogenic conditions, these novel nanomaterials just behaved as activated carbons with an uptake proportional to the surface area. Shortly after, the development of coordination polymers with permanent porosity opened a new route to nanoporous materials with ultra-high internal surfaces. Mainly metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been attracting a great deal of attention in recent years, as very high gravimetric hydrogen capacities can be achieved at 77 K. Cryogenic storage by physisorption of hydrogen molecules will safely operate at low pressures, is fully reversible, and possesses fast kinetics. This mini-review shows the rapid development in this field over the past 25 years. Exemplarily, the main focus is on results obtained in the hydrogen storage laboratory in Stuttgart and their connection to Applied Physics A.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. C. Carpetis, W. Peschka, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 5, 539 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3199(80)90061-010.1016/0360-3199(80)90061-0 ↗
2. J. Noh, R. Agarwal, J. Schwarz, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 12, 693 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3199(87)90132-710.1016/0360-3199(87)90132-7 ↗
3. A. Dillon, M. Heben, Appl. Phys. A 72, 133 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339010078810.1007/s003390100788 ↗
4. R. Chahine, P. Bénard, Advances in cryogenic engineering (Plenum Press, New York, 1998), pp.1257–126410.1007/978-1-4757-9047-4_157 ↗
5. R. Chahine, T. K. Bose. Characterization and optimization of adsorbents for hydrogen storage. Hydrogen Energy Progress XI: Proceedings of the 11th World Hydrogen Energy Conference. 2 (1996)
6. S. Iijima, Nature 354, 56 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/354056a010.1038/354056a0 ↗
7. B. I. Yakobson, R. E. Smalley, American Scientist 85, 324 (1997). https://www.jstor.org/stable/27856810
8. A. Rinzler, J. Liu, H. Dai, P. Nikolaev, C. Huffman, F. Rodriguez-Macias, P. Boul, A.H. Lu, D. Heymann, D. Colbert, Appl. Phys. (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339005073410.1007/s003390050734 ↗
9. U. Bünger, W. Zittel, Appl. Phys. A. 72, 147 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339010076910.1007/s003390100769 ↗
10. V. Meregalli, M. Parrinello, Appl. Phys. A 72, 143 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339010078910.1007/s003390100789 ↗
11. M. Hirscher, M. Becher, M. Haluska, U. Dettlaff-Weglikowska, A. Quintel, G. Duesberg, Y.-M. Choi, P. Downes, M. Hulman, S. Roth, Appl. Phys. A 72, 129 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339010081610.1007/s003390100816 ↗
12. C. Zandonella, Nature 410, 734 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/3507118310.1038/35071183 ↗
13. R. Dagani, CENEAR. 80, 25 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-v080n002.p02510.1021/cen-v080n002.p025 ↗
14. D.P. Broom, M. Hirscher, Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 3368 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EE01435F10.1039/C6EE01435F ↗
15. P.J.F. Harris, Carbon nanotube science: Synthesis, properties and applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009)10.1017/CBO9780511609701 ↗
16. M. Nijkamp, J. Raaymakers, A. Van Dillen, K. De Jong, Appl. Phys. A 72, 619 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339010084710.1007/s003390100847 ↗
17. L. Schlapbach, A. Züttel, Nature (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/3510463410.1038/35104634 ↗
18. M. Eddaoudi, J. Kim, N. Rosi, D. Vodak, J. Wachter, M. O’Keeffe, O.M. Yaghi, Science 295, 469 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.106720810.1126/science.1067208 ↗
19. N.L. Rosi, J. Eckert, M. Eddaoudi, D.T. Vodak, J. Kim, M. O’Keeffe, O.M. Yaghi, Science 300, 1127 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.108344010.1126/science.1083440 ↗
20. G. Férey, M. Latroche, C. Serre, F. Millange, T. Loiseaua, A. Percheron-Guégan, Chem. Commun. 24, 2976 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1039/B308903G10.1039/B308903G ↗
21. J.L.C. Rowsell, A.R. Millward, K.S. Park, O.M. Yaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 5666 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja049408c10.1021/ja049408c ↗
22. B. Panella, M. Hirscher, Adv. Mater. 17, 538 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20040094610.1002/adma.200400946 ↗
23. B. Panella, M. Hirscher, H. Pütter, U. Müller, Adv. Funct. Mater. 17, 520 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20050056110.1002/adfm.200500561 ↗
24. B. Panella, M. Hirscher, S. Roth, Carbon 43, 2209 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.03.03710.1016/j.carbon.2005.03.037 ↗
25. A.G. Wong-Foy, A.J. Matzger, O.M. Yaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 3494 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja058213h10.1021/ja058213h ↗
26. H. Furukawa, N. Ko, Y.B. Go, N. Aratani, S.B. Choi, E. Choi, A.Ö. Yazaydin, R.Q. Snurr, M. O’Keeffe, J. Kim, O.M. Yaghi, Science 329, 428 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.119216010.1126/science.1192160 ↗
27. O.K. Farha, A. Özgür Yazaydın, I. Eryazici, C.D. Malliakas, B.G. Hauser, M.G. Kanatzidis, S.T. Nguyen, R.Q. Snurr, J.T. Hupp, Nat. Chem. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.83410.1038/nchem.834 ↗
28. D. Broom, C. Webb, K. Hurst, P. Parilla, T. Gennett, C. Brown, R. Zacharia, E. Tylianakis, E. Klontzas, G. Froudakis et al., Appl. Phys. A 122, 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-9651-410.1007/s00339-016-9651-4 ↗
29. B. Streppel. Hydrogen Adsorption on Metal-Organic Frameworks, Doctoral dissertation, University Stuttgart, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-677010.18419/opus-6770 ↗
30. J. Goldsmith, A.G. Wong-Foy, M.J. Cafarella, D.J. Siegel, Chem. Mater. 25, 3373 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/cm401978e10.1021/cm401978e ↗
31. R. Balderas-Xicohténcatl, P. Schmieder, D. Denysenko, D. Volkmer, M. Hirscher, Energy Technol. 6, 510 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.20170060810.1002/ente.201700608 ↗
32. J. Purewal, D. Liu, J. Yang, A. Sudik, D. Siegel, S. Maurer, U. Müller, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 37, 2723 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.00210.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.002 ↗
33. G. Blanita, I. Coldea, I. Misan, D. Lupu, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39, 17040 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.08.03810.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.08.038 ↗
34. R. Zacharia, D. Cossement, L. Lafi, R. Chahine, J. Mater. Chem. 20, 2145 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1039/B922991D10.1039/B922991D ↗
35. R. Balderas-Xicohténcatl, M. Schlichtenmayer, M. Hirscher, Energy Technol. 6, 578 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.20170063610.1002/ente.201700636 ↗
36. S.E. Bambalaza, H.W. Langmi, R. Mokaya, N.M. Musyoka, J. Ren, L.E. Khotseng, J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 23569 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA09227C10.1039/C8TA09227C ↗
37. L. Zhang, M.D. Allendorf, R. Balderas-Xicohténcatl, D.P. Broom, G.S. Fanourgakis, G.E. Froudakis, T. Gennett, K.E. Hurst, S. Ling, C. Milanese et al., Prog. Energy (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.20170063610.1002/ente.201700636 ↗
38. D.G. Madden, D. O’Nolan, N. Rampal, R. Babu, C. Çamur, A.N. Al Shakhs, S.-Y. Zhang, G.A. Rance, J. Perez, N.P. Maria Casati et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 13729 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c0460810.1021/jacs.2c04608 ↗
39. M. Schlichtenmayer, M. Hirscher, Appl. Phys. A. 122, 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-9864-610.1007/s00339-016-9864-6 ↗
40. M. Schlichtenmayer, M. Hirscher, J. Mater. Chem. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM15890F10.1039/C2JM15890F ↗
41. S. Glante, M. Fischer, M. Hartmann, Emergent Mater. 4, 1295 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-021-00258-710.1007/s42247-021-00258-7 ↗
42. Y. Sun, R.F. DeJaco, Z. Li, D. Tang, S. Glante, D.S. Sholl, C.M. Colina, R.Q. Snurr, M. Thommes, M. Hartmann, J.I. Siepmann, Sci. Adv. 7, 3983 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg398310.1126/sciadv.abg3983 ↗
43. A. Ahmed, S. Seth, J. Purewal, A.G. Wong-Foy, M. Veenstra, A.J. Matzger, D.J. Siegel, Nat. Commun. 10, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09365-w10.1038/s41467-019-09365-w ↗
44. J.A. Mason, J. Oktawiec, M.K. Taylor, M.R. Hudson, J. Rodriguez, J.E. Bachman, M.I. Gonzalez, A. Cervellino, A. Guagliardi, C.M. Brown, P.L. Llewellyn, N. Masciocchi, J.R. Long, Nature 527, 357 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1573210.1038/nature15732 ↗
45. J.J.P. Mota, D. Martins, D. Lopes, I. Catarino, G.G. Bonfait, J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 24252 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0686110.1021/acs.jpcc.7b06861 ↗
46. B. Streppel, M. Hirscher, PCCP. 13, 3220 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CP01873B10.1039/C0CP01873B ↗
47. T. Düren, F. Millange, G. Férey, K.S. Walton, R.Q. Snurr, J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 15350 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp074723h10.1021/jp074723h ↗
48. H. Oh, D. Lupu, G. Blanita, M. Hirscher, RSC Adv. 4, 2648 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA46233A10.1039/C3RA46233A ↗
49. J. Park, J. Ha, R. Muhammad, H.K. Lee, R. Balderas-Xicohtencatl, Y. Cheng, A.J. Ramirez-Cuesta, B. Streppel, M. Hirscher, H.R. Moon, A.C.S. Appl, Energy Mater. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c0190710.1021/acsaem.2c01907 ↗
50. R. Balderas-Xicohténcatl, H.-H. Lin, C. Lurz, L. Daemen, Y. Cheng, K. Cychosz Struckhoff, R. Guillet-Nicolas, G. Schütz, T. Heine, A.J. Ramirez-Cuesta, M. Thommes, M. Hirscher, Nat. Chem. 14, 1319 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-022-01019-710.1038/s41557-022-01019-7 ↗