Multi-material interface printing of a magneto-responsive hydrogel scaffold with tuned stiffness
Source abstract
Abstract
Osteochondral tissue engineering remains a significant challenge due to the complex biochemical and mechanical gradients between cartilage and subchondral bone. In this study, we present the development of a 3D-printed, multi-material magnetic hydrogel scaffold with tunable stiffness. To achieve this, we formulated a gelatin-alginate hydrogel matrix with various levels of embedded iron oxide magnetic particles (MPs) to create controlled hard-soft interfacial regions. The optimal composition (i.e . , 2.5% gelatin, 5% alginate, and 10% (w/v) MPs) demonstrated magnetorheological behavior, including increased effective Young’s modulus from 159 to 172 kPa and decreased viscosity from 175 to 145 kPa·s under a static magnetic field. Later, we evaluated scaffold printability through filament collapse, fusion, and porous scaffold tests, identifying a Gel:Alg ratio of 1:2 as optimal for structural fidelity. Mechanical and rheological characterizations confirmed that MPs significantly enhanced stiffness and responsiveness to magnetic fields. A checkered scaffold design enabled the fabrication of alternating hard and soft regions, and a bi-layered scaffold demonstrated improved interfacial adhesion. Micro-computed tomography provided quantitative evidence of magnetic field-induced particle redistribution within the hydrogel, confirming internal reorganization beyond bulk mechanical response. Importantly, in vitro live/dead assays confirmed that scaffold fabrication and magnetic functionality did not adversely affect cell viability. This platform offers a tunable, bioactive, and magneto-responsive scaffold architecture with potential for osteochondral repair or other applications requiring dynamic interface tissue engineering. • Development of a 3D-printed multi-material magnetic hydrogel with spatially controlled stiffness. • Optimized gelatin–alginate (1:2) with 10% iron oxide balances printability and magneto-responsive stiffening. • µCT analysis demonstrates direction-specific particle redistribution under magnetic stimulation. • Tensile testing confirms mechanically stable integration between magnetic and non-magnetic regions. • In vitro studies show cytocompatibility, supporting potential use in osteochondral tissue engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Biofabrication of the osteochondral unit and its applications: Current and future directions for 3D bioprinting
2. Cartilage restoration, part 1: Basic science, historical perspective, patient evaluation, and treatment options10.1177/0363546504273510 ↗
3. Arthritis in Color: Advanced Imaging of Arthritis10.3174/ajnr.A1813 ↗
4. Innovative tissue-engineered strategies for osteochondral defect repair and regeneration: Current progress and challenges10.1002/adhm.202001008 ↗
5. Osteochondral defects: present situation and tissue engineering approaches10.1002/term.37 ↗
6. Current treatment concepts for osteochondral lesions of the talus10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_106_20 ↗
7. Mesenchymal stem cells10.1002/jor.1100090504 ↗
8. 3D printing for bone-cartilage interface regeneration
9. Cartilage regeneration in humans with adipose tissue-derived stem cells and adipose stromal vascular fraction cells: updated status10.3390/ijms19072146 ↗
10. Biomimetic injectable and bilayered hydrogel scaffold based on collagen and chondroitin sulfate for the repair of osteochondral defects10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128593 ↗
11. Microstructurally and mechanically tunable acellular hydrogel scaffold using carboxymethyl cellulose for potential osteochondral tissue engineering10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126658 ↗
12. Photo-crosslinked integrated triphasic scaffolds with gradient composition and strength for osteochondral regeneration10.1039/D3TB02031B ↗
13. Bioprinting of a zonal-specific cell density scaffold: a biomimetic approach for cartilage tissue engineering10.3390/app11177821 ↗
14. Osteochondral regeneration with 3D-printed biodegradable high-strength supramolecular polymer reinforced-gelatin hydrogel scaffolds10.1002/advs.201900867 ↗
15. Biomimetic approaches for the design and fabrication of bone-to-soft tissue interfaces10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00620 ↗
16. Chapter 10 - hydrogels
17. 3D (bio)printing of magnetic hydrogels: formulation and applications in tissue engineering10.36922/ijb.0965 ↗
18. Magnetized Cell‐Scaffold Constructs for Bone Tissue Engineering: Advances in Fabrication and Magnetic Stimulation10.1002/advs.202510094 ↗
19. Incorporating 4D into bioprinting: real-time magnetically directed collagen fiber alignment for generating complex multilayered tissues10.1002/adhm.201800894 ↗
20. CyMAD bioreactor: a cyclic magnetic actuation device for magnetically mediated mechanical stimulation of 3D bioprinted hydrogel scaffolds10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105253 ↗
21. Bioprinting of magnetically deformable scaffolds10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01371 ↗
22. Graphene Oxide-loaded magnetic nanoparticles within 3D hydrogel form High-performance scaffolds for bone regeneration and tumour treatment10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106672 ↗
23. 3D Printing of dynamic tissue scaffold by combining self-healing hydrogel and self-healing ferrogel10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112108 ↗
24. Biodegradation of hydrogel carrier incorporating fibroblast growth factor10.1089/ten.1999.5.127 ↗
25. Mössbauer spectrum analysis by evolution algorithm10.1016/S0168-583X(97)00314-5 ↗
26. The magnetization of pure iron and nickel
27. Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprinting10.1088/1758-5090/aa90e2 ↗
28. Spherical indentation of soft matter beyond the Hertzian regime: numerical and experimental validation of hyperelastic models10.1007/s10237-008-0139-9 ↗
29. N. Antonovaite, M. Berardi, K. Bielawski, N. Rijnveld, Fiber-optics Based Nanoindenters for Studying the Mechanics of Diseases Oct. 2020 doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19720.85761.
30. A metrological approach for the calibration of force transducers with interferometric readout10.1088/2051-672X/3/2/025004 ↗
31. Facile determination of the Poisson’s ratio and Young’s Modulus of polyacrylamide gels and polydimethylsiloxane10.1021/acsapm.3c03154 ↗
32. Microfluidic in-situ measurement of poisson’s ratio of hydrogels10.3390/mi11030318 ↗
33. “ASTM D412 | Instron.” Accessed: Feb. 04, 2026. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.instron.com/en/testing-solutions/astm-standards/astm-d412/〉.
34. Experimental and numerical investigation of the die swell in 3D printing processes10.3390/mi14020329 ↗
35. Optimization of SA-Gel hydrogel printing parameters for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting10.3390/gels11070552 ↗
36. Emerging magnetic fabrication technologies provide controllable hierarchically-structured biomaterials and stimulus response for biomedical applications10.1002/advs.202202278 ↗
37. Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084 ↗
38. Effect of nozzle diameter and cross-linking on the micro-structure, compressive and biodegradation properties of 3D printed gelatin/collagen/hydroxyapatite hydrogel10.1016/j.bprint.2023.e00266 ↗
39. Non-ideal effects in indentation testing of soft tissues10.1007/s10237-013-0519-7 ↗