Performance evaluation of fly ash-lime-gypsum-quarry dust (FALGQ) bricks for sustainable construction
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The aim of this study is to optimize fly ash utilization by combining lime, gypsum, and quarry dust in various proportions to develop fly ash lime gypsum quarry dust (FLGQ) bricks with dimensions of 230 mm × 110 mm × 70 mm, as a potential alternative to traditional bricks. The investigation analysed the compressive strength, split tensile strength, water absorption, density, and initial rate of absorption of FLGQ bricks across different mixes. Mix 9 (M 9 ), comprising of 35% fly ash, 10% lime, 25% gypsum, and 30% quarry dust, exhibited a 15% higher compressive strength (7.2 MPa) and 12% higher split tensile strength (0.85 MPa) compared to the superior conventional brick. Water absorption for M 9 was reduced by 18%, enhancing the durability. Prediction models for compressive and split tensile strengths were developed using regression analysis, achieving over 92% accuracy when compared to experimental data at 28 and 56 days. Additionally, a positive correlation was observed between the 14th, 28th, and 56th days results, reinforcing the reliability of predictions in brick compressive strength. These research findings indicate that M 9 is superior and more sustainable alternative to traditional bricks, with significant improvements in key performance metrics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education , Kanyakumari , Tamil Nadu, 629180 , India
Department of Civil Engineering, PSN Engineering College , Tirunelveli , Tamil Nadu, 627152 , India
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Sufian, M., S. Ullah, K. A. Ostrowski, A. Ahmad, A. Zia, K. Śliwa-Wieczorek, et al. An experimental and empirical study on the use of waste marble powder in construction material. Materials, Vol. 14, No. 14, 2021, id. 3829.10.3390/ma14143829 ↗
2. Thejas, H. K. and N. Hossiney. A short review on environmental impacts and application of iron ore tailings in the development of sustainable eco-friendly bricks. Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 61, 2021, pp. 327–331.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.522 ↗
3. Khan, Z., A. Gul, S. A. A. Shah, S. Qazi, N. Wahab, E. Badshah, et al. Utilization of marble wastes in clay bricks: a step towards lightweight energy-efficient construction materials. Civil Engineering Journal, Vol. 7, No. 9, 2021, pp. 1488–1500.10.28991/cej-2021-03091738 ↗
4. Mohan, H. T., K. Jayanarayanan, and K. M. Mini. A sustainable approach for the utilization of PPE biomedical waste in the construction sector. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, Vol. 32, 2022, id. 101060.10.1016/j.jestch.2021.09.006 ↗
5. Micheal, A. and R. R. Moussa. Investigating the economic and environmental effect of integrating sugarcane bagasse (SCB) fibres in cement bricks. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2021, pp. 3297–3303.10.1016/j.asej.2020.12.012 ↗
6. Sidhu, B. S., A. S. Dhaliwal, K. S. Kahlon, and S. Singh. On the use of flyash-lime-gypsum (FaLG) bricks in the storage facilities for low-level nuclear waste. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, Vol. 54, No. 2, 2022, pp. 674–680.10.1016/j.net.2021.08.006 ↗
7. Dutta, R. K., J. S. Yadav, V. N. Khatri, and G. Venkataraman. A study on the suitability of fly ash–lime–alccofine mixtures in the construction of road pavement. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, Vol. 9, 2021, pp. 1–27.10.1007/s40515-021-00200-8 ↗
8. Bernard, V. A. R., S. M. Renuka, S. Avudaiappan, C. Umarani, M. Amran, P. Guindos, et al. Performance investigation of the incorporation of ground granulated blast furnace slag with fly ash in autoclaved aerated concrete. Crystals, Vol. 12, No. 8, 2022, id. 1024.10.3390/cryst12081024 ↗
9. Simão, F. V., H. Chambart, L. Vandemeulebroeke, P. Nielsen, L. R. Adrianto, S. Pfister, et al. Mine waste is a sustainable resource for facing bricks. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 368, 2022, id. 133118.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133118 ↗
10. Khitab, A., M. S. Riaz, A. Jalil, R. B. N. Khan, W. Anwar, R. A. Khan, et al. Manufacturing of clayey bricks by the synergistic use of waste brick and ceramic powders as partial replacement of clay. Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 18, 2021, id. 10214.10.3390/su131810214 ↗
11. Mookherjee, M., D. Mainprice, K. Maheshwari, O. Heinonen, D. Patel, and A. Hariharan. Pressure induced elastic softening in framework aluminosilicate - albite (NaAlSi3O8). Scientific Reports, Vol. 6, 2016, id. 34815.10.1038/srep34815 ↗
12. Garg, N. K., K. Vaishnav, and R. Negi. Investigation of concrete by using fly ash, GGBFS, quarry dust and recycle aggregate: a review. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology, and Science, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2021, pp. 929–941.
13. Soharu, A., N. BP, and A. Sil. Fly ash bricks development using concrete waste debris and self-healing bacteria. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2022, pp. 1037–1046.10.1007/s10163-022-01378-w ↗
14. Sithole, T., T. Mashifana, D. Mahlangu, and L. Tchadjié. Effect of binary combination of waste gypsum and fly ash to produce building bricks. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, Vol. 31, 2023, id. 100913.10.1016/j.scp.2022.100913 ↗
15. Mukhtar, A., A. U. Qazi, Q. S. Khan, M. J. Munir, S. M. S. Kazmi, and A. Hameed. Feasibility of using coal ash for the production of sustainable bricks. Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 11, 2022, id. 6692.10.3390/su14116692 ↗
16. Waheed, A., R. Azam, M. R. Riaz, and M. Zawam. Mechanical and durability properties of fly-ash cement sand composite bricks: An alternative to conventional burnt clay bricks. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, Vol. 7, 2022, pp. 1–12.10.1007/s41062-021-00630-w ↗
17. Philip, S., A. Ajin, F. Shahul, L. Babu, and J. Tina. Fabrication and performance evaluation of lightweight eco-friendly construction bricks made with fly ash and bentonite. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Vol. 8, No. 6, 2019, pp. 2090–2096.10.35940/ijeat.F8478.088619 ↗
18. Premalatha, P. V., S. S. Kumar, C. S. Murali, and K. V. Aadithiya. Profound probing of Groundnut Shell Ash (GSA) as pozzolanic material in making innovative sustainable construction material. Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 49, 2022, pp. 1275–1280.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.367 ↗
19. Sharma, R. and H. Guleria. To study the basic geotechnical characteristics of fly ash lime gypsum composite with silty sand. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, Vol. 11, No. 6, 2020, pp. 903–912.
20. Gourav, K. and B. V. Venkatarama Reddy. Characteristics of compacted fly ash brick masonry. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 41, No. 2, June–July 2014, pp. 144–157.
21. Kumar, S. Fly ash-lime-phosphogypsum hollow blocks for walls and partitions. Building and Environment, Vol. 38, 2003, pp. 291–295.10.1016/S0360-1323(02)00068-9 ↗
22. Kumar, S. A preservative study on fly ash-lime-gypsum bricks and hollow blocks for low-cost housing development. Construction and Building Material, Vol. 16, 2002, pp. 519–525.10.1016/S0950-0618(02)00034-X ↗
23. Sumathi, A. and K. Saravana Raja Mohan. Compressive strength of fly ash brick with the addition of lime, gypsum and quarry dust. International Journal of ChemTech Research , Vol. 7, No. 1, 2014–2015, pp. 28–36, CODEN (USA): IJCRGG ISSN:0974-4290.
24. Younis, M. O., M. Amin, and A. M. Tahwia. Durability and mechanical characteristics of sustainable self-curing concrete utilizing crushed ceramic and brick wastes. Case study in Construction Materials, Vol. 17, Dec 2022, id. e01251.10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01251 ↗
25. Shilar, F. A. and S. S. Quadri. Performance evaluation of interlocking bricks using granite waste powder. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, Vol. 4, 2019, pp. 82–87.10.33564/IJEAST.2019.v04i02.014 ↗
26. Chakradhara Rao, M. Influence of brick dust, stone dust and recycled fine dust on properties of natural and recycled aggregate concrete. Structural Concrete, Vol. 22, 2020, pp. 1–16suco.202000103.10.1002/suco.202000103 ↗
27. Determination of compressive strength, water absorption, efflorescence, IS 3495-1 to 4, Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi, 1992.
28. Bureau of Indian standard (IS 12894: 2002) pulverized fuel ash lime brick specifications.
29. Marinkovic, S. and A. Kostic-Pulek. Examination of the system fly ash-lime-calcined gypsum-water. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of solids p68, Vol. 68, 2007, pp. 1121–1125.10.1016/j.jpcs.2007.02.039 ↗
30. Değirmenci, N. Utilization of phosphogypsum as raw and calcined material in manufacturing of building products. Construction and building material, Vol. 22, 2008, pp. 1857–1862.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.04.024 ↗
31. Shen, W., M. Zhou, and Q. Zhao. Study on lime-fly ash-phosphogypsum binder. Construction and building material, Vol. 21, 2007, pp. 1480–1485.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.07.010 ↗
32. Humphery, D. and A. Mary. Assessment of the quality of burnt bricks produced in Ghana: The case of Ashanti region. Case studies in construction material, Vol. 15, 2021, id. e00708.10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00708 ↗
33. Sinkhonde, D., R. O. Onchiri, W. O. Oyawa, and J. N. Mwero. The behaviour of rubberized concrete with waste clay brick powder under varying curing conditions. Heliyon, Vol. 9, 2023, id. e13372.10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13372 ↗
34. Mahdi, S. N., N. Hossiney, and M. M. A. B. Abdullah. Strength and durability property of Geopolymer paver blocks made with fly ash and brick kiln rice husk ash. Case studies in construction material, Vol. 16, 2022, id. e00800.10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00800 ↗
35. Elahi, T. E., A. R. Shahriar, and M. S. Islam. Engineering characteristics of compressed earth blocks stabilised with cement and flyash. Construction and building material, Vol. 277, 2021, id. 122367.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122367 ↗
36. Sharma, U., N. Gupta, and K. K. Saxena. Comparative study on the effect of industrial by-products as a replacement of cement in concrete. Materials Today: Online, Vol. 44, 2021, pp. 45–51.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.211 ↗
37. Bureau of Indian standard (IS 5816: 1999) Splitting Tensile strength of concrete – Method of test.
38. Kannan Rajkumar, P. R., K. Divya Krishnan, C. Sudha, P. T. Ravichandran, and T. D. Vigneshwaran. Study on the use of industrial waste in preparation of green bricks. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 9, No. 5, Feb 2016.10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i5/87261 ↗
39. Garg, M., M. Singh, and R. Kumar. Some aspects of the durability of a phosphogypsum-lime-fly ash binder. Construction of Building Material, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1996, pp. 274–279.10.1016/0950-0618(95)00085-2 ↗