journal article·2026-02Open access

A topology optimized spinal fusion cage for the use of weak but osteoinductive bioceramics as synthetic bone grafts

Salim Ghandour, Michael Bryant, Richard M. Hall, Jonas Åberg, Per Isaksson, Cecilia Persson

Abstract

Spinal cages can be used to treat degenerated discs, by restoring height and stability in the segment and facilitating fusion between vertebrae. Bone grafts, often placed in the cage to enhance bioactivity, may be replaced with synthetic calcium phosphates (CPs). However, their inherent brittleness presents a challenge. This study aimed to design a cervical cage using topology optimization to accommodate bioactive but weak materials, while minimizing the amount of non-resorbable material, herein Ti6Al4V. A design space of a typical cage was subjected to 1Nm in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending with 100 N preload in compression and compression-shear, resulting in an optimized design retaining only 21 % of the volume. The design was verified and experimentally validated using additively manufactured Ti6Al4V cages, applying ASTM-F2077 quasi-static testing with and without the inclusion of CP. The results showed no migration or cracking of the CP, and a mechanical performance in the upper range of approved cages. A significant increase in torsional strength and stiffness for the CP-containing cages of 11 % and 17 % was found, respectively. Overall, the study demonstrated the potential of topology optimization in creating spinal cages with reduced permanent material content and adequate mechanical properties for incorporating brittle materials like CPs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Cellular and Composite Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. Biology of spine fusion10.1385/1-59259-863-3:225 ↗
2. Pseudarthrosis of the spine10.5435/00124635-200908000-00003 ↗
3. Trends in lumbar fusion procedure rates and associated hospital costs for degenerative spinal diseases in the United States, 2004 to 201510.1097/BRS.0000000000002822 ↗
4. Cervical Spinal fusion: 16-year trends in epidemiology, indications, and In-hospital outcomes by surgical approach10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.004 ↗
5. Predicting trends in cervical spinal surgery in the United States from 2020 to 204010.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.055 ↗
6. McDermott
7. Reduced surgical site infection rates following spine surgery using an enhanced prophylaxis protocol
8. Postoperative deep wound infection in adults after posterior lumbosacral spine fusion with instrumentation: incidence and management10.1097/00002517-200002000-00009 ↗
9. J.L. Go, S. Rothman, A. Prosper, R. Silbergleit, A. Lerner, Spine infections, neuroimaging Clinics of North America. 22 (2012) 755–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2012.06.002.10.1016/j.nic.2012.06.002 ↗
10. Risk factors for postoperative spinal infection: A retrospective analysis of 5065 cases10.25259/SNI-284-2019 ↗
11. Pseudarthrosis of the cervical spine: risk factors, diagnosis and management10.4184/asj.2016.10.4.776 ↗
12. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature10.1097/01.brs.0000137069.88904.03 ↗
13. Hospital readmission within 2 years following adult thoracolumbar spinal deformity surgery10.1097/BRS.0000000000001552 ↗
14. A.L. Buchholz, J.C. Quinn, C.I. Shaffrey, Postoperative spinal deformities: kyphosis, nonunion, and loss of motion segment, complications in neurosurgery. (2019) 325–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-50961-9.00055-4.10.1016/B978-0-323-50961-9.00055-4 ↗
15. Fusion rates in multilevel cervical spondylosis comparing allograft fibula with autograft fibula in 126 patients10.1097/00007632-199110001-00022 ↗
16. Evolution of design of interbody cages for anterior lumbar interbody fusion10.1111/os.12259 ↗
17. Autograft versus allograft for cervical spinal fusion10.1055/s-0036-1580610 ↗
18. PEEK cages in lumbar fusion mid-term clinical outcome and radiologic fusion10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826eaf74 ↗
19. Complications in the use of rhBMP-2 in PEEK cages for interbody spinal fusions10.1097/BSD.0b013e31815ea897 ↗
20. E.R. Carlisle, J.S. Fischgrund, Bone graft and fusion enhancement, surgical management of spinal deformities. (2009) 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-141603372-1.50030-5.10.1016/B978-141603372-1.50030-5 ↗
21. The clinical use of allografts, demineralized bone matrices, synthetic bone graft substitutes and osteoinductive growth factors: A survey study10.1007/s11420-005-0111-5 ↗
22. Spine disorders
23. Calcium phosphate bone graft substitutes: failures and hopes10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.02.028 ↗
24. Osteoinductive ceramics as a synthetic alternative to autologous bone grafting10.1073/pnas.1003600107 ↗
25. 3 - Bioceramics: types and clinical applications
26. Bioceramics and biocomposites in spine surgery
27. Comparison of two moldable calcium phosphate-based bone graft materials in a noninstrumented canine interspinous implantation model10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0347 ↗
28. Design of ceramic-based cements and putties for bone graft substitution10.22203/eCM.v020a01 ↗
29. Bioceramics and bone healing10.1302/2058-5241.3.170056 ↗
30. Biphasic calcium phosphate with submicron surface topography in an Ovine model of instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion10.1002/jsp2.1039 ↗
31. Monetite granules versus particulate autologous bone in bone regeneration10.1016/j.aanat.2015.03.008 ↗
32. In situ bone regeneration of large cranial defects using synthetic ceramic implants with a tailored composition and design10.1073/pnas.2007635117 ↗
33. Development of a bioactive implant for repair and potential healing of cranial defects: technical note10.3171/2013.6.JNS1360 ↗
34. Osteoconduction and osteoinduction of low-temperature 3D printed bioceramic implants10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.023 ↗
35. A prospective clinical comparison of rectangular titanium cages and iliac crest autografts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion10.1007/s10143-003-0297-2 ↗
36. Lumbar interbody fusion10.1097/BRS.0000000000002534 ↗
37. Metallurgical characterization of a porous tantalum biomaterial (Trabecular Metal) for orthopaedic implant applications
38. 7.11 Trends in materials for spine surgery
39. MIS expandable interbody spacers
40. Biomaterials in spinal implants: A review10.14245/ns.1938296.148 ↗
41. Comparison of titanium and PEEK medical plastic implant materials for their bacterial biofilm formation properties10.3390/polym14183862 ↗
42. Bacterial adhesion characteristics on implant materials for intervertebral cages: titanium or PEEK for spinal infections?10.1007/s00586-020-06705-z ↗
43. Is tantalum protective against infection in revision total hip arthroplasty?10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.34236 ↗
44. Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: an in vivo experiment10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069 ↗
45. Design and fabrication of 3D-printed anatomically shaped lumbar cage for intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration treatment10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035001 ↗
46. Custom-made titanium 3-dimensional printed interbody cages for treatment of osteoporotic fracture–Related spinal deformity10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.160 ↗
47. Design and biomechanical verification of additive manufactured composite spinal cage composed of porous titanium cover and PEEK body10.3390/app9204258 ↗
48. Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization10.1007/s004190050248 ↗
49. Sigmund · 2001
50. Interbody fusion cage design using integrated global layout and local microstructure topology optimization10.1097/01.BRS.0000134573.14150.1A ↗
51. Structural and mechanical evaluations of a topology optimized titanium interbody fusion cage fabricated by selective laser melting process10.1002/jbm.a.31231 ↗
52. Finite element analysis of the lumbar spine with a new cage using a topology optimization method10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.03.007 ↗
53. Macroscopic topology optimization of fusion cages used in TLIF surgery10.1007/978-981-32-9941-2_53 ↗
54. Elastic properties and strain-to-crack-initiation of calcium phosphate bone cements: revelations of a high-resolution measurement technique10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.023 ↗
55. Mechanical characterization of brushite and hydroxyapatite cements10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00041-2 ↗
56. Implicit and explicit finite element models predict the mechanical response of calcium phosphate-titanium cranial implants10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104085 ↗
57. Quantitative computed tomography estimates of the mechanical properties of human vertebral trabecular bone10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00185-1 ↗
58. Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element study10.1097/00007632-198403000-00003 ↗
59. Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone10.1002/jor.1100150115 ↗
60. Mechanical properties of adult vertebral cancellous bone: correlation with collagen intermolecular cross-links10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.9.1621 ↗
61. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion10.2106/00004623-195840030-00009 ↗
62. M.P. Bendsøe, O. Sigmund, Topology optimization, Topology optimization. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05086-6.10.1007/978-3-662-05086-6 ↗
63. Fatigue properties of a titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) fabricated via electron beam melting (EBM): effects of internal defects and residual stress10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.04.022 ↗
64. Forces on the spine, in: biomaterials for spinal surgery
65. Mechanical characterization of brushite cements: A Mohr circles’ approach10.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:6<769::AID-JBM19>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
66. Compressive, diametral tensile and biaxial flexural strength of cutting-edge calcium phosphate cements10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.03.028 ↗
67. Mechanical performance of cervical intervertebral body fusion devices: A systematic analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.032 ↗
68. Static and dynamic fatigue behavior of topology designed and conventional 3D printed bioresorbable PCL cervical interbody fusion devices10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.05.015 ↗
69. Element Materials Technology, ASTM F2077: testing intervertebral body fusion devices, 2019.
70. Patient-specific titanium-reinforced calcium phosphate implant for the repair and healing of complex cranial defects10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.061 ↗
71. Implant-bone-interface: reviewing the impact of titanium surface modifications on osteogenic processes in vitro and in vivo10.1002/btm2.10239 ↗
72. Spine interbody implants: material selection and modification, functionalization and bioactivation of surfaces to improve osseointegration10.1111/os.12098 ↗