journal article·2020-12Open access

Injectable and assembled 3D solid structure for free-to-fixed shape in bone reconstruction

Wei Zhu, Wei Li, Kaiyuan Chen, Bin Feng, Lizhi Zhou, Xisheng Weng, Sheng Cui, Håkan Engqvist, Wei Xia

Abstract

There is a gap between injectable and scaffold-like bioceramics. Injectable bioactive materials, such as bone cement and hydrogel, are good for minimized surgery, but the extremely low porosity and small pore size limited enhanced bone repair and regeneration. Macroporous bioceramic scaffolds are used because of the controlled pore size and porosity, but not injectable. It's a challenge of preparation of an injectable macroporous ceramic scaffold for minimized bone reconstruction. By using the reversible setting reaction of calcium sulfate and combining a dual setting system with magnesium silicate hydrate, the injectable and assembled 3D porous bioceramic scaffold has been successfully developed. The content of amorphous magnesium silicate hydrate in the dual setting system affected the mechanical strength and degradation. The porous structure could be controlled by the size of granules. The granules can also be used for the fabrication of porous materials with varied shapes and customized structures by using a simple injection process. The biological testing showed good biocompatibility and in vitro osteogenesis. By using the femoral lateral condyle defect model, we can see the granules could be injected into the defect and formed a rigid porous structure in situ, and further presented better new bone formation compared with autologous bone chips. Briefly, we demonstrated the first injectable 3D solid porous ceramic structure for minimized bone repair and free-form shaping.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Synthetic bone graft versus autograft or allograft for spinal fusion: a systematic review10.3171/2016.1.SPINE151005 ↗
2. Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries10.1186/s40824-019-0157-y ↗
3. T. Winkler, F.A. Sass, G.N. Duda, K. Schmidt-Bleek, A review of biomaterials in bone defect healing, remaining shortcomings and future opportunities for bone tissue engineering: the unsolved challenge, (2046-3758 (print)).
4. Nanomaterials promise better bone repair10.1016/j.mattod.2015.12.003 ↗
5. Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: a review
6. Inflammation, fracture and bone repair10.1016/j.bone.2016.02.020 ↗
7. Mechanisms of bone repair and regeneration10.1016/j.molmed.2009.07.002 ↗
8. Biomaterial strategies for engineering implants for enhanced osseointegration and bone repair10.1016/j.addr.2015.03.013 ↗
9. Regenerating bone with bioactive glass scaffolds: a review of in vivo studies in bone defect models10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.030 ↗
10. Calcium orthophosphate-based bioceramics10.3390/ma6093840 ↗
11. https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-growth.
12. Self-setting calcium orthophosphate formulations10.3390/jfb4040209 ↗
13. Dicalcium phosphate cements: brushite and monetite10.1016/j.actbio.2011.08.005 ↗
14. Critical review: injectability of calcium phosphate pastes and cements10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.019 ↗
15. 9.1 definition and advantages of bone cements in orthopedic surgery
16. 1.17 bioactive ceramics: cements☆
17. Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012 ↗
18. Role of pore size and morphology in musculo-skeletal tissue regeneration10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.087 ↗
19. Quantitative analysis of the effect of porosity on the fatigue strength of bone cement10.1016/j.actbio.2008.08.024 ↗
20. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
21. Use of an injectable complex of β-tricalcium phosphate granules, hyaluronate, and fibroblast growth factor-2 on repair of unstable intertrochanteric fractures10.2174/1874120701206010098 ↗
23. Calcium sulfate: properties and clinical applications, journal of biomedical materials research part b: applied biomaterials: an official journal of the society for biomaterials
24. Structure, properties and animal study of a calcium phosphate/calcium sulfate composite cement10.1016/j.msec.2013.12.034 ↗
25. In vivo biocompatibility of zinc-doped magnesium silicate bio-ceramics10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00297 ↗
26. Antibacterial forsterite (Mg2SiO4) scaffold: a promising bioceramic for load bearing applications
27. Characterization of magnesium silicate hydrate (MSH) gel formed by reacting MgO and silica fume
28. Synthesis and characterization of an injectable and hydrophilous expandable bone cement based on poly(methyl methacrylate)10.1021/acsami.7b12983 ↗
29. D.O. orthopedics, X. hospital, promotive effect of magnesium ions on viability and differentiation of osteoblasts and the underlying mechanism
30. Properties of magnesium silicate hydrates (M-S-H)10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.10.003 ↗
31. R. Olkowski, P. Kaszczewski, J. Czechowska, D. Siek, D. Pijocha, A. Zima, A. Slosarczyk, M. Lewandowska-Szumiel, Cytocompatibility of the selected calcium phosphate based bone cements: comparative study in human cell culture, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.26(12) 270. 1–270.12.10.1007/s10856-015-5589-x ↗
32. M.G. Gandolfi, F. Zamparini, M. Degli Esposti, F. Chiellini, F. Fava, P. Fabbri, P. Taddei, C. Prati, Highly porous polycaprolactone scaffolds doped with calcium silicate and dicalcium phosphate dihydrate designed for bone regeneration, Mater. Sci. Eng.102(SEP.) 341–361.10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.040 ↗
33. C.S. Adams, K. Mansfield, R.L. Perlot, I.M. Shapiro, Matrix regulation of skeletal cell apoptosis: role of calcium and phosphate ions, J. Biol. Chem.276(23) 20316–20322.10.1074/jbc.M006492200 ↗
34. E.J. Tsang, C.K. Arakawa, P.A. Zuk, B.M. Wu, Osteoblast interactions within a biomimetic apatite microenvironment, 39(4) 1186–1200.10.1007/s10439-010-0245-6 ↗
35. J.S. Lee, J.M. Lee, G.I. Im, Electroporation-mediated transfer of Runx2 and Osterix genes to enhance osteogenesis of adipose stem cells, Biomaterials32(3) 760–768.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.09.042 ↗
36. J. Zhang, C. Liang, L. Tang, X. Zhang, L. Yang, Z. Kai, A. He, A.R. Boccaccini, W. Jie, J. Zhao, Highly dispersed lithium doped mesoporous silica nanospheres regulating adhesion, proliferation, morphology, ALP activity and osteogenesis related gene expressions of BMSCs, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces S0927776518304090-.
37. Calcium phosphate surfaces promote osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00103.x ↗
38. F. Mammoli, S. Castiglioni, S. Parenti, C. Cappadone, G. Farruggia, S. Iotti, P. Davalli, J. Maier, A. Grande, C. Frassineti, Magnesium is a key regulator of the balance between osteoclast and osteoblast differentiation in the presence of vitamin D3, Int. J. Mol. Sci.20(2).10.3390/ijms20020385 ↗
39. Biocompatibility of human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells with human acellular amniotic membrane scaffold
40. Assessment of calcium sulfate hemihydrate–tricalcium silicate composite for bone healing in a rabbit femoral condyle model10.1016/j.msec.2018.02.024 ↗
41. X. Cui, W. Huang, Y. Zhang, C. Huang, Z. Yu, L. Wang, W. Liu, T. Wang, J. Zhou, H. Wang, Evaluation of an injectable bioactive borate glass cement to heal bone defects in a rabbit femoral condyle model, 73 (2017) 585.10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.101 ↗