journal article·2026-04Open access

Machine learning-driven inverse design of functionally graded auxetic metamaterials including non-linear regimes

S. Farshbaf, N. Dialami, M. Cervera

Abstract

Auxetic metamaterials, characterized by their negative Poisson’s ratio and unique deformation behavior, offer remarkable potential for developing tunable and energy-absorbing structures. However, the vast geometric design space of auxetic unit cells and nonlinear deformation mechanisms that extend well beyond the linear elastic regime, present a major challenge for inverse design and optimization. This study addresses the inverse design of auxetic metamaterials by integrating efficient forward prediction with machine learning-driven inverse optimization. A deep neural network model is developed and trained on a comprehensive labeled dataset of numerically simulated auxetic unit cells within a printable design space across all deformation stages, with finite element analysis results validated through compression testing. The forward prediction model accurately estimates mechanical responses based on geometric parameters, while the inverse design framework determines optimal configurations to achieve target energy absorption levels. A detailed parametric study is conducted to explore the influence of geometric variations on mechanical behavior and identify optimized unit cell designs. These optimized cells are assembled into 3 × 3 metamaterial structures to ensure stable mechanical performance. Furthermore, functionally graded configurations are proposed to enhance tunability and energy absorption capacity. Among various graded designs, structures graded in thickness along the Y-direction exhibit superior stress distribution and performance. Numerical and experimental analyses of stress–strain behavior and Poisson’s ratio confirm the tunable mechanical response of the proposed graded structures. The findings demonstrate that the developed deep learning-based framework enables accurate inverse design of auxetic metamaterials and provides an effective pathway for engineering tunable, high-performance graded structures suitable for applications in impact mitigation, biomedical devices, and adaptive engineering systems. • Enhanced auxetic unit cells dataset generated via nonlinear FE analysis. • Deep neural network enables inverse design from energy and strain metrics. • Graded auxetic structures designed with tunable thickness and stress plateaus. • TPU structures fabricated by FFF and validated through compression tests. • Numerical and experimental results confirm energy absorption performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Enhancing the mechanical performance of additively manufactured auxetic structures through design modifications: experimental and numerical analysis
2. Auxetic metamaterials and structures: a review10.1088/1361-665X/aaa61c ↗
3. Elastic properties of 2D auxetic honeycomb structures-a review
4. Three decades of auxetics research- materials with negative Poisson’s ratio: a review10.1002/adem.201600053 ↗
5. In-plane compression behavior of hybrid honeycomb metastructures: Theoretical and experimental studies10.1016/j.ast.2020.106081 ↗
6. Auxetic materials: the positive side of being negative10.1049/esej:20000402 ↗
7. Large deformation and collapse analysis of re-entrant auxetic and hexagonal honeycomb lattice structures subjected to tension and compression10.1016/j.mechmat.2025.105457 ↗
8. Auxetic metamaterials for bone-implanted medical devices: recent advances and new perspectives
9. Auxetic mechanical metamaterials to enhance sensitivity of stretchable strain sensors10.1002/adma.201706589 ↗
10. Real-world applications of auxetic structures in engineering: A review
11. Auxetic materials for personal protection: a review10.1002/pssb.202200324 ↗
12. Design, fabrication and vibration characteristics of a novel composite auxetic structure embedded with resonators
13. An investigation on flexural properties of anti-tetrachiral auxetic structures fabricated by material extrusion
14. Numerical and experimental analysis of the structural performance of am components built by fused filament fabrication10.1007/s10999-020-09524-8 ↗
15. A hybrid numerical-experimental strategy for predicting mechanical response of components manufactured via FFF10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115998 ↗
16. New 3D petal-like structures with lightweight, high strength, high energy absorption, and auxetic characteristics10.1016/j.tws.2024.112483 ↗
17. Enhanced two-dimensional superelasticity in a laser micromachined auxetic NiTiNOL geometry10.1016/j.matdes.2025.113793 ↗
18. Computational characterization of polymeric materials 3D-printed via fused filament fabrication10.1080/15376494.2022.2032496 ↗
19. Advances in additive manufacturing of auxetic structures for biomedical applications
20. Experimental, computational, and dimensional analysis of the mechanical performance of fused filament fabrication parts10.3390/polym13111766 ↗
21. Design and optimization of bioinspired auxetic structure for biomedical applications10.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.105139 ↗
22. A novel orthogonal anisotropic auxetic structure with enhanced auxeticity10.1016/j.tws.2025.113478 ↗
23. Multi-gradient coupling design for auxetic structures with multi-plateau stress to improve energy absorption capacity10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121000 ↗
24. Design and modeling of auxetic and hybrid honeycomb structures for in-plane property enhancement10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.067 ↗
25. Quasi-static compression performance of material extrusion enabled re-entrant diamond auxetic metamaterial: Fabrication, tuning the geometrical parameters and fibre reinforcements10.1016/j.tws.2022.109550 ↗
26. Design and mechanical property studies of 3D re-entrant lattice auxetic structure10.1016/j.ast.2021.106998 ↗
27. A novel combined auxetic tubular structure with enhanced tunable stiffness10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109303 ↗
28. 4D printed auxetic structures with tunable mechanical properties
29. Poisson’s ratio control in auxetic metamaterials under large tensile strains
30. Deep learning-enhanced design for functionally graded auxetic lattices10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116477 ↗
31. Energy absorption properties of a novel auxetic honeycomb based on deep learning technology10.1007/s00707-024-03960-9 ↗
32. FDM manufactured auxetic structures: an investigation of mechanical properties using machine learning techniques
33. Deep learning in mechanical metamaterials: from prediction and generation to inverse design10.1002/adma.202302530 ↗
34. Deep-learning-based isogeometric inverse design for tetra-chiral auxetics10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114808 ↗
35. Controllable inverse design of auxetic metamaterials using deep learning10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110178 ↗
36. Artificial neural networks for inverse design of a semi-auxetic metamaterial10.1016/j.tws.2024.111927 ↗
37. A deep learning approach for inverse design of gradient mechanical metamaterials10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107920 ↗
38. Deep learning, deconvolutional neural network inverse design of strut-based lattice metamaterials10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113258 ↗
39. Nature-inspired architected materials using unsupervised deep learning10.1038/s44172-022-00037-0 ↗
40. Choi · 2024
41. Generative artificial intelligence in lattice structure design for additive manufacturing: A critical review
42. Designing complex architectured materials with generative adversarial networks10.1126/sciadv.aaz4169 ↗
43. Melendo · 2018
44. J.M. Carbonell, Pfem-Kratos: Development for the kinetics of fluids, solids and grounds, modelling of subtractive manufacturing processes. GitLab Repository: https://Gitlab.Com/Pfem-Research/Kratos.
45. Associative coupled thermoplasticity at finite strains: Formulation, numerical analysis and implementation10.1016/0045-7825(92)90170-O ↗
46. de Souza Neto · 2011
47. Mechanical properties of foam-filled hexagonal and re-entrant honeycombs under uniaxial compression10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114922 ↗
48. Machine learning analysis/optimization of auxetic performance of a polymeric meta-hybrid structure of re-entrant and meta-trichiral10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105463 ↗
49. Inverse design of 3D cellular materials with physics-guided machine learning10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112103 ↗
50. Machine learning basics
51. Adam · 2014
52. Effects of the unit-cell size and arrangement on the compressive behaviors of lattice structures in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
53. Deformation and energy absorption characteristics of graded auxetic metamaterials featuring peanut-shaped perforations under in-plane compression10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113318 ↗
54. Influence of density gradient on the compression of functionally graded BCC lattice structure10.3390/ma16020520 ↗
55. Compressive behaviour of 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane honeycombs with graded densities10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.019 ↗
56. Additively manufactured biodegradable Zn metamaterials with tunable Poisson’s ratio and enhanced mechanical properties10.1080/17452759.2025.2460209 ↗