Solid-liquid phase transition temperature prediction of alloys based on machine learning key feature screening
Source abstract
Abstract
A machine learning strategy is proposed based on the demand for prediction of solid-liquid phase transition temperature properties of multi-component precious metal alloys. Firstly, the candidate feature set are constructed by mathematical operation of the physical and chemical parameters of the material according to the chemical ratio of the alloy chemical formula. Then, a novel feature selection framework of correlation screening → genetic algorithm screening → feature weight ranking → exhaustive screening is proposed to effectively identify key feature combinations affecting solid-liquid phase transition temperature. Finally, the support vector regression algorithm is used to establish the "key feature combination-solid phase transition temperature" model with an error less than 9.83% and the "key feature combination-liquid phase transition temperature" model with an error less than 9.35%. The proposed new feature framework overcomes the inability of conventional feature selection techniques to simultaneously meet the requirements of interpretability, low computational complexity, and strong feature generality. Moreover, the comprehensive equilibrium complexity and accuracy (R2) constructed "solid temperature-key feature combination" with an error of less than 6.50% and "liquid phase transition temperature-key feature combination" with an error of less than 6.71 % by symbolic regression algorithm, which strengthened the understanding of the influence of key independent variable feature parameters on solid-liquid phase transition temperature prediction. This established machine learning strategy has excellent reliability in the prediction of solid-liquid phase transition temperature of multi-component alloys, and the proposed feature selection framework is expected to develop into a new feature selection technique.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced materials and composites · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (73)
Show source-provided references
1. Brazing filler metals[J]10.1080/09506608.2019.1613311 ↗
2. Current review on the research status of cemented carbide brazing: filler materials and mechanical properties[J]10.1007/s12540-020-00608-w ↗
3. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al2O3/Cu joints brazed with Ag-Cu-Ti+Zn composite fillers[J]10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.125 ↗
4. Effect of bonding temperature on isothermal solidification rate during transient liquid phase bonding of Inconel 738LC superalloy[J]10.1016/j.msea.2005.01.055 ↗
5. Selecting metal alloy electric contact materials for MEMS switches[J]10.1088/0960-1317/14/8/006 ↗
6. A review of the latest developments in the field of refractory high-entropy alloys[J]10.3390/cryst11060612 ↗
7. Rapid solidification of hypoeutectic aluminum copper alloys using fast-scanning calorimetry[J]
8. Metal injection moulding of titanium and titanium alloys: challenges and recent development[J]10.1016/j.powtec.2017.06.053 ↗
9. Design and characterization of a novel MgAlZnCuMn low melting point light weight high entropy alloy (LMLW-HEA)[J]10.1016/j.intermet.2022.107658 ↗
10. Analysis of solidification microstructure and cracking mechanism of a matrix high-speed steel deposited using directed-energy deposition[J]10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164523 ↗
11. Advancement of machine learning in materials science[J]
12. Machine learning in materials chemistry: an invitation[J]
13. Machine learning and materials informatics approaches in the analysis of physical properties of carbon nanotubes: a review[J]10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110939 ↗
14. Active learning in materials science with emphasis on adaptive sampling using uncertainties for targeted design[J]10.1038/s41524-019-0153-8 ↗
15. Machine learning for advanced energy materials[J]10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100049 ↗
16. Machine-learning and high-throughput studies for high-entropy materials[J]10.1016/j.mser.2021.100645 ↗
17. Machine learning for alloys[J]10.1038/s41578-021-00340-w ↗
18. Machine learning assisted materials design and discovery for rechargeable batteries[J]10.1016/j.ensm.2020.06.033 ↗
19. The data-intensive scientific revolution occurring where two-dimensional materials meet machine learning[J]
20. Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects[J]10.1126/science.aaa8415 ↗
21. Machine learning assisted rapid discovery of high-performance silver alloy electrical contact materials[J]
22. A two-step fused machine learning approach for the prediction of glass-forming ability of metallic glasses[J]10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160040 ↗
23. Computational design of a single crystal nickel-based superalloy with improved specific creep endurance at high temperature[J]10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109194 ↗
24. Searching for high entropy alloys: a machine learning approach[J]10.1016/j.actamat.2020.07.065 ↗
25. Prediction of mechanical properties of biomedical magnesium alloys based on ensemble machine learning[J]10.1016/j.matlet.2023.134605 ↗
26. High-entropy alloys as catalysts for the CO2 and CO reduction reactions[J]10.1021/acscatal.9b04343 ↗
27. Filter methods for feature selection–a comparative study[C]
28. The correlation coefficient: an overview[J]10.1080/10408340500526766 ↗
29. Feature selection: filter methods performance challenges[C]
30. Gierlichs · 2008 · 426
31. Review on wrapper feature selection approaches[C]
32. A new wrapper feature selection approach using neural network[J]10.1016/j.neucom.2010.04.003 ↗
33. Branch-and-bound methods: a survey[J]10.1287/opre.14.4.699 ↗
34. Bundy · 1984
35. A brief history and recent achievements in bidirectional search[C]
36. Forward and backward stepping in variable selection[J]10.1080/00949658008810367 ↗
37. Feature subset selection problem using wrapper approach in supervised learning[J]
38. Kumar M., Husain M., Upreti N., et al. Genetic algorithm: review and application[J]. Available at SSRN 3529843, 2010.10.2139/ssrn.3529843 ↗
39. Lal · 2006
40. Wang S., Tang J., Liu H. Embedded unsupervised feature selection[C], Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2015, 29(1).10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9211 ↗
41. Discovery of a new criterion for predicting glass-forming ability based on symbolic regression and artificial neural network[J]10.1063/5.0105445 ↗
42. GB/T 10859-2008, Nickel base brazing filler metals[S].
43. GB/T 6418-2008, Copper base brazing filler metals[S].
44. GB/T 18762-2017, Specification for filler brazing materials made of precious metals and their alloy[S].
45. GB/T 10046-2018, Silver brazing filler metals[S].
46. Qiyun · 2008
47. Schwartz · 2003
48. Interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of tungsten carbide brazed joints using Ag-Cu-Zn+ Ni/Mn filler alloy[J]10.1016/S1003-6326(17)60292-9 ↗
49. Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of the joint of TiAl alloys and C/SiC composites vacuum brazed with Ag–Cu filler metal[J]10.1016/j.matchar.2011.05.007 ↗
50. Interdiffusion and microstructure evolution during brazing of austenitic martensitic stainless steel and aluminum-bronze with Ag-Cu-Zn based brazing filler material[J]10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.043 ↗
51. Interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of the TiC-Ni cermet/Ag-Cu-Zn/Invar joint[J]10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.108830 ↗
52. Wetting and brazing characteristic of high nitrogen austenitic stainless steel and 316L austenitic stainless steel by Ag–Cu filler[J]10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.04.064 ↗
53. Brazing of stainless steels using Cu-Ag-Mn-Zn braze filler: studies on wettability, mechanical properties, and microstructural aspects[J]10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.057 ↗
54. GB/T 3131-2020, Tin-lead solder[S].
55. GB/T 13679-2016, Manganese base brazing filler metal[S].
56. GB/T 20422-2018, Lead-free solders[S].
57. GB/T 13815-2008, Aluminium base brazing filler metals[S].
58. Machine-learning methods enable exhaustive searches for active bimetallic facets and reveal active site motifs for CO2 reduction[J]10.1021/acscatal.7b01648 ↗
59. An overview of the supervised machine learning methods[J]10.20544/HORIZONS.B.04.1.17.P05 ↗
60. Machine learning methods: an overview[J]
61. A tutorial on support vector regression[J]10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88 ↗
62. Application of the genetic programming for increasing the soft annealing productivity in steel industry[J]10.1080/10426910802679634 ↗
63. Riolo · 2008
64. Genetic programming as a means for programming computers by natural selection[J]10.1007/BF00175355 ↗
65. Genetic programming based quantitative structure–retention relationships for the prediction of Kovats retention indices[J]10.1016/j.chroma.2015.09.086 ↗
66. Vyas · 2015 · 99
67. Langdon · 2013
68. Soft-sensor development for biochemical systems using genetic programming[J]10.1016/j.bej.2014.02.007 ↗
69. Eureqa: software review10.1007/s10710-010-9124-z ↗
70. Identifying models of dielectric breakdown strength from high-throughput data via genetic programming[J]
71. Relationship between the heat of fusion and the melting point of metal[J]
72. Feature selection method reducing correlations among features by embedding domain knowledge[J]10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118195 ↗
73. Multi-layer feature selection incorporating weighted score-based expert knowledge toward modeling materials with targeted properties[J]10.1002/adts.201900215 ↗