Overcoming geometric limitations in metallic glasses through stretch blow molding
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) exhibit remarkable mechanical properties, such as high strength and elasticity, which is often paired with fracture toughness. Their supercooled liquid region gives rise to plastic-like processing and suggests parts and shapes that can otherwise not be obtained for crystalline metals. However, current processing techniques only allow for limited options in terms of geometry, thicknesses uniformity, and shape complexity. Here we introduce a new processing technique, “stretch blow molding,” to expand the range of possible parts and increase the available geometries that can be fabricated with BMGs. Additionally, a model is derived that allows for the quantification and prediction of stretch blow molding and provides insight into its potential use and limitations. We demonstrate that with stretch blow molding overall strains exceeding 2000% are achievable, compared to the previously reported ∼150% of blow molding. With the ability to stretch blow mold shapes that were previously unachievable with any other metal fabrication technique in a fast and economical manner, and the superb properties of BMGs, we look forward to a broad commercial adaptation of this technique.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Herzog · Acta Mater. · 2016 · 117 · 37110.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019 ↗
2. King · Appl. Phys. Rev. · 2015 · 210.1063/1.4937809 ↗
3. Gibson · Mater. Today · 2018 · 21 · 69710.1016/j.mattod.2018.07.001 ↗
4. Pauly · Mater. Today · 2013 · 16 · 3710.1016/j.mattod.2013.01.018 ↗
5. Backofen · JOM-J. Met. · 1964 · 16
6. Hamilton · J. Met. · 1980 · 32 · 43
7. Chokshi · Mater. Sci. Eng. R-Rep. · 1993 · 10 · 23710.1016/0927-796X(93)90009-R ↗
8. Zwigl · Metall. Mater. Trans · 1998 · 29 · 257110.1007/s11661-998-0229-4 ↗
9. Barnes · J. Mater. Eng. Perform. · 2007 · 10 · 11665
10. Brechet · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2002 · 4 · 319
11. Schroers · Mater. Today · 2011 · 14 · 1410.1016/S1369-7021(11)70018-9 ↗
12. Schroers · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 156610.1002/adma.200902776 ↗
13. Kawamura · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2001 · 304 · 67410.1016/S0921-5093(00)01562-8 ↗
14. Kato · Scr. Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 202310.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.03.025 ↗
15. Sarac · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2012 · 22 · 316110.1002/adfm.201200539 ↗
16. Chen · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 62 · 4910.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.053 ↗
17. Martinez · Scr. Mater. · 2008 · 59 · 18710.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.03.008 ↗
18. Hasan · Scr. Mater. · 2016 · 123 · 14010.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.06.021 ↗
19. Douglas · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2016
20. Homer · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2014 · 16 · 85010.1002/adem.201300566 ↗
21. Pitt · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110
22. Schroers · Scr. Mater. · 2007 · 57 · 34110.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.04.033 ↗
23. Sarac · J. Microelectromech. Syst. · 2011 · 20 · 2810.1109/JMEMS.2010.2090495 ↗
24. Bordeenithikasem · Scr. Mater. · 2015 · 104 · 5610.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.03.024 ↗
25. Chiu · Scr. Mater. · 2009 · 61 · 2810.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.02.052 ↗
26. Kumar · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24
27. Kanik · J. Microelectromech. Syst. · 2015 · 24 · 1910.1109/JMEMS.2014.2363581 ↗
28. Lu · Acta Mater. · 2003 · 51 · 342910.1016/S1359-6454(03)00164-2 ↗
29. Yang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91
30. Lu · Acta Mater. · 2003 · 51 · 342910.1016/S1359-6454(03)00164-2 ↗
31. Schroers · Acta Mater. · 2008 · 56 · 47110.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.008 ↗
32. Busch · Acta Mater. · 1998 · 46 · 472510.1016/S1359-6454(98)00122-0 ↗
33. Waniuk · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 18420310.1103/PhysRevB.67.184203 ↗
34. Busch · MRS Bull. · 2007 · 32 · 62010.1557/mrs2007.122 ↗
35. Ketov · Nature · 2015 · 52410.1038/nature14674 ↗
36. Fan · Phys. Rev. E · 2017 · 95
37. Ketkaew · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 18410.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.046 ↗
38. Kumar · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 153610.1038/ncomms2546 ↗
39. Magagnosc · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 74 · 16510.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.002 ↗
40. Ketkaew · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 910.1038/s41467-018-05682-8 ↗
41. Louzguine-Luzgin · J. Mater. Res. · 2008 · 23 · 51510.1557/JMR.2008.0066 ↗
42. Ketkaew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2015 · 11510.1103/PhysRevLett.115.265502 ↗
43. Sun · Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China · 2005 · 15 · 115
44. Jiang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 928710.1063/1.1571234 ↗
45. Lohwongwatana · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 9610.1103/PhysRevLett.96.075503 ↗
46. Shao · Phys. Rev. E · 2015 · 9110.1103/PhysRevE.91.020301 ↗
47. Conner · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 94 · 90410.1063/1.1582555 ↗
48. Kumar · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 357210.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.016 ↗
49. Kumar · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97
50. Li · Commun. Phys. · 2018 · 1
51. Mota · JOM · 2017 · 69 · 215610.1007/s11837-017-2415-6 ↗