Additive manufacturing enables personalised porous high-density polyethylene surgical implant manufacturing with improved tissue and vascular ingrowth
Source abstract
Abstract
Porous high-density polyethylene (pHDPE) surgical implants have played a significant role in aesthetic, reconstructive and skeletal augmentation procedures for more than 30 years and have been the gold-standard synthetic implant used in more than 400,000 procedures worldwide. The effects of pHDPE implant properties such as porosity, geometry and surface chemistry are crucial considerations. Additive manufacturing and plasma surface treatment are promising approaches to induce rapid tissue integration and vascularisation, improve healing times and lead to more satisfactory patient outcomes. Here, a novel pHDPE scaffold architecture obtained by laser sintering was characterised to quantify porosity variations as a result of manufacturing, compared to scaffolds manufactured via traditional moulding, laser sintering, and the clinical gold-standard surgical implant, MEDPOR. Plasma surface treatment was also explored as a means of improving the hydrophilicity of the HDPE. An in vitro cell culture study examined the attachment of cells on treated and non-treated scaffolds. After 3 days, plasma-treated scaffolds exhibited a 1.6-fold increase in cell attachment compared to non-treated, hydrophobic samples. Plasma-treated and non-treated samples were then implanted subcutaneously in rats for 1, 4, and 8 weeks to assess biocompatibility, tissue ingrowth and vascularisation. Histological analysis revealed that laser sintered StarPore scaffolds exhibited significantly higher tissue ingrowth compared to the moulded scaffolds, whilst fibrous encapsulation dominated the tissue response in moulded StarPore scaffolds. Plasma treatment did not significantly affect the quantity of tissue ingrowth, however it significantly increased the density of blood vessels within sintered StarPore scaffolds by an average of 86.6%. Overall, this study demonstrated that novel manufacturing and plasma treatment of pHDPE surgical implants enhanced cell attachment in vitro and increased blood vessel density in laser sintered StarPore scaffolds in vivo.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Anatomy and Medical Technology · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (77)
Show source-provided references
1. 2017
2. 2018
3. 2018
4. Synthes CMF, “SynPOR Porous Polyethylene Implants. For craniofacial and orbital augmentation and reconstruction. Technique Guide,” 2006. Accessed: Dec. 05, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://synthes.vo.llnwd.net/o16/LLNWMB8/USMobile/SynthesNorthAmerica/ProductSupportMaterials/Technique Guides/MXTGSynPOR6632F.pdf.
5. Histological behavior of HDPE scaffolds fabricated by the ‘Press-and-Baking’ method10.1177/0883911505055386 ↗
6. Maxillofacial reconstruction with medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.3.128 ↗
7. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering10.1038/nmat1421 ↗
8. Tissue response to porous high density polyethylene as a three-dimensional scaffold for bone tissue engineering: an experimental study10.1080/09205063.2019.1582278 ↗
9. Bone growth into porous high-density polyethylene10.1002/jbm.820100416 ↗
10. Early tissue infiltrate in porous polyethylene implants into bone: a scanning electron microscope study10.1002/jbm.820090514 ↗
11. Characteristics of tissue growth into proplast and porous polyethylene implants in bone10.1002/jbm.820130502 ↗
12. An evaluation of bone growth into porous high density polyethylene10.1002/jbm.820100212 ↗
13. Poriferous · 2015
14. 2020
15. Evaluation of porous polyethylene for external ear reconstruction10.1097/00000637-199001000-00006 ↗
16. Plasma treated high-density polyethylene (HDPE) Medpor implant immobilized with rhBMP-2 for improving the bone regeneration10.1155/2014/810404 ↗
17. Management of complications of MedporⓇ implants in rhinoplasty10.20517/2347-9264.2017.06 ↗
18. The use of high-density polyethylene implants in facial deformities10.1001/archotol.124.11.1219 ↗
19. Use of a three-dimensional model to optimize a MEDPOR implant for delayed reconstruction of a suprastructure maxillectomy defect10.1055/s-0033-1356762 ↗
20. Additive manufacturing applications in medical cases: a literature based review10.1016/j.ajme.2017.09.003 ↗
21. Patient specific in situ 3D printing
22. Laser additive manufacturing of customized prosthetics and implants for biomedical applications10.1016/B978-0-08-100433-3.00015-4 ↗
23. Biomedical applications of polyethylene10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.05.037 ↗
24. A novel method for surface modification to promote cell attachment to hydrophobic substrates10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980615)40:4<511::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
25. The evolution of polystyrene as a cell culture material10.1089/ten.teb.2018.0056 ↗
26. Z. Chen, Z. Wang, Q. Fu, Z. Ma, P. Fang, and C. He, “Microstructure and surface state of plasma-treated high-density polyethylene elucidated by energy-tunable positron annihilation and water contact angle measurements,” 2016, p. 011202, doi: 10.7567/jjapcp.2.011202.10.56646/jjapcp.2.0_011202 ↗
27. High density polyethylene containing antibacterial silver nanoparticles for medical applications10.1002/masy.201250527 ↗
28. Influence of organic phase change materials on the physical and mechanical properties of HDPE and PP polymers10.1039/C8RA03839B ↗
29. Surface characterization of plasma treated polymers for applications as biocompatible carriers10.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.50 ↗
30. Surface and bulk properties improvement of HDPE by a batch plasma treatment10.1002/app.43011 ↗
31. Plasma processing for tailoring the surface properties of polymers
32. High-density polyethylene (HDPE) surface treatment using an RF capacitive atmospheric pressure cold Ar plasma jet10.1088/1009-0630/15/6/16 ↗
33. Role of plasma surface treatments on wetting and adhesion10.4236/eng.2010.26052 ↗
34. Surface modification of spin-coated high-density polyethylene films by argon and oxygen glow discharge plasma treatments10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00928-5 ↗
35. Adsorption of proteins and cell adhesion to plasma treated polymer substrates10.1080/00914037.2013.854243 ↗
36. The role of albumin and fibronectin in the adhesion of fibroblasts to plasma polymer surfaces10.1002/ppap.201100054 ↗
37. Argon plasma modified nanocomposite polyurethane scaffolds provide an alternative strategy for cartilage tissue engineering10.1186/s12951-019-0477-z ↗
38. Surface modification by plasma etching impairs early vascularization and tissue incorporation of porous polyethylene (MedporⓇ) implants10.1002/jbm.b.33528 ↗
39. The effect of anisotropic architecture on cell and tissue infiltration into tissue engineering scaffolds10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.010 ↗
40. Pore size, tissue ingrowth, and endothelialization of small-diameter microporous polyurethane vascular prostheses10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00478-2 ↗
41. The effect of pore size on tissue ingrowth and neovascularization in porous bioceramics of controlled architecture in vivo
42. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis10.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
43. BoneJ: Free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ10.1016/j.bone.2010.08.023 ↗
44. Design tools for patient specific and highly controlled melt electrowritten scaffolds10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103695 ↗
45. Blood prefabricated hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate induces ectopic vascularized bone formation: Via modulating the osteoimmune environment10.1039/C8BM00287H ↗
46. 3-Dimensional functionalized polycaprolactone-hyaluronic acid hydrogel constructs for bone tissue engineering10.1111/jcpe.12686 ↗
47. A preclinical large-animal model for the assessment of critical-size load-bearing bone defect reconstruction10.1038/s41596-019-0271-2 ↗
48. A review of trabecular bone functional adaptation: What have we learned from trabecular analyses in extant hominoids and what can we apply to fossils?10.1111/joa.12446 ↗
49. Ren · 2017
50. Improving electrospun fibre stacking with direct writing for developing scaffolds for tissue engineering for non-load bearing bone10.1007/978-3-319-11776-8_31 ↗
51. Improved fabrication of melt electrospun tissue engineering scaffolds using direct writing and advanced electric field control10.1116/1.4914380 ↗
52. Differential regulation of endothelial cell adhesion, spreading, and cytoskeleton on low-density polyethylene by nanotopography and surface chemistry modification induced by argon plasma treatment10.1002/jbm.a.31539 ↗
53. Interactions of polymer model surfaces with cold plasmas: Hexatriacontane as a model molecule of high-density polyethylene and octadecyl octadecanoate as a model of polyester. I. Degradation rate versus time and power10.1002/app.1992.070461108 ↗
54. Surface modification of low-density polyethylene by inductively coupled argon plasma10.1021/jp052121x ↗
55. Enhanced adherence of mouse fibroblast and vascular cells to plasma modified polyethylene10.1016/j.msec.2015.03.052 ↗
56. Disinfection and sterilization using plasma technology: Fundamentals and future perspectives for biological applications
57. Cell viability assessment using the Alamar blue assay: A comparison of 2D and 3D cell culture models10.1016/j.tiv.2014.09.014 ↗
58. Biomimetic in vitro model of cell infiltration into skin scaffolds for pre-screening and testing of biomaterial-based therapies10.3390/cells8080917 ↗
59. Discrepancies between metabolic activity and DNA content as tool to assess cell proliferation in cancer research10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01013.x ↗
60. Morphology and filterability of red blood cells in neonatal and adult rats10.1203/00006450-199003000-00004 ↗
61. Formation of blood clot on biomaterial implants influences bone healing10.1089/ten.teb.2013.0709 ↗
62. Human immune cells’ behavior and survival under bioenergetically restricted conditions in an in vitro fracture hematoma model10.1038/cmi.2012.56 ↗
63. Animal models for bone tissue engineering and modelling disease10.1242/dmm.033084 ↗
64. Biological responses to materials10.1146/annurev.matsci.31.1.81 ↗
65. Characterization of the foreign body response to common surgical biomaterials in a murine model10.1007/s00238-017-1308-9 ↗
66. Reducing capsular thickness and enhancing angiogenesis around implant drug release systems10.1016/S0168-3659(01)00502-8 ↗
67. Controlling fibrous capsule formation through long-term down-regulation of collagen type i (COL1A1) expression by nanofiber-mediated siRNA gene silencing10.1016/j.actbio.2012.09.029 ↗
68. Porous implants modulate healing and induce shifts in local macrophage polarization in the foreign body reaction10.1007/s10439-013-0933-0 ↗
69. The osteoimmunomodulatory property of a barrier collagen membrane and its manipulation: Via coating nanometer-sized bioactive glass to improve guided bone regeneration10.1039/C7BM00869D ↗
70. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 ↗
71. Macrophages, foreign body giant cells and their response to implantable biomaterials10.3390/ma8095269 ↗
72. Corradetti · 2017
73. Invasive intraneural interfaces: foreign body reaction issues10.3389/fnins.2017.00497 ↗
74. Histopathological and scanning electron microscopy findings of retrieved porous polyethylene implants10.1016/j.ijom.2017.01.007 ↗
75. Onlay augmentation: a comparative study between bovine xenogeneic graft and allogeneic graft on the calvarium of rat model
76. Comparison of alloplastic implants for facial bones by scintigraphy and histology: An experimental study10.1007/s002380050158 ↗
77. Blood Vessels and Endothelial Cells