journal article·2021-03Open access

Robust metal-organic frameworks for dry and wet biogas upgrading

Arunraj Chidambaram, David H. Le, Jorge A.R. Navarro, Kyriakos C. Stylianou

Abstract

Abstract Biofuels are considered as viable, sustainable and renewable alternatives to fossil fuels. One amongst them is biomethane which has emerged as one of the valuable contributors in facilitating the essential transition towards green energy sources. Industrially, anaerobic digestion of biomass results in the production of crude biogas that comprises mainly of methane (CH4) and other components like carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O). Biogas is saturated in water vapour which must be removed to ensure the operational stability and safety of the technology systems that handles wet biogas and employs the end-product biomethane. Through a series of separation processes, the biogas is cleaned (drying) and upgraded (CO2/CH4 separation) to biomethane. The adsorptive separation technology with nanoporous materials for biogas upgrading has become progressively competitive due to their meritorious features. In particular, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have shown a tremendous potential in upgrading biogas under dry conditions. However, their affinity for water promotes competitive co-adsorption, and this, coupled with their relatively low hydrolytic stability affects their upgrading performance negatively. This fact requires the complete removal of moisture before the adsorptive based gas separation upgrading process can be carried out. A similar situation applies for highly hydrophilic zeolite adsorptive systems. In this work, we present two permanently porous MOFs made of aluminium metal ions (Al(III)) and tetra-carboxylate ligands with strong CO2 binding pockets comprising of two aromatic rings which are 7 A apart. Both MOFs are robust, and adsorption isotherms revealed that they are porous to CO2 and CH4 at 303 K with isosteric heat of adsorption of −25 to −40 and −13 to −16 kJ/mol, respectively. Interestingly, these materials are found to be non-porous to water at low relative humidity as shown by water vapour isotherms. Inspired by their single component sorption behaviours, we demonstrate that their biogas upgrading performance is not affected regardless of the high water vapour content (4 vol% and 85% RH) in the feed gas of the multicomponent fixed bed breakthrough experiments. This is due to the lack of competitive co-adsorption of CO2 and H2O within the hydrophobic CO2 binding pockets. This makes both MOFs presented in this work as industrially relevant candidates for biogas upgrading application which can withstand residual moisture of dried biogas as well as the momentary breakthroughs of wet biogas.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: policies and facts10.1016/j.envdev.2015.03.006 ↗
2. Towards the implementation of sustainable biofuel production systems10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.005 ↗
3. Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources
4. 2020
5. Bio-based chemicals value added products from biorefineries
6. How and to which extent can the gas sector contribute to a climate-neutral European energy system? A qualitative approach10.1186/s13705-019-0207-2 ↗
7. Kampman · 2020
8. The production and use of renewable natural gas as a climate strategy in the United States
9. European Biogas Association (2020), The contribution of the biogas and biomethane industries to medium-term greenhouse gas reduction targets and climate-neutrality by 2050https://www.europeanbiogas.eu/the-contribution-of-the-biogas-and-biomethane-industries-to-medium-term-greenhouse-gas-reduction-targets-and-climate-neutrality-by-2050/The webpage was accessed in the month of June 2020.
10. Catuti · 2019
11. Manure-based biogas fermentation residues–friend or foe of soil fertility?10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.006 ↗
12. Circular biogas-based economy in a rural agricultural setting10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.255 ↗
13. Innovation in biological production and upgrading of methane and hydrogen for use as gaseous transport biofuel10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.009 ↗
14. Hagen M, Polman E, Jensen J, Myken A, Joensson O, Dahl A. Adding gas from biomass to the gas grid. Contract No: XVII/4.1030. 2001 Jul 1(99-412).
15. Biogas cleaning
16. From biogas to biofuel: materials used for biogas cleaning to biomethane10.1002/cben.201600016 ↗
17. (a) https://condorchem.com/en/biogas-drying/, (b) https://www.progecosrl.com/en/sdb-biogas-drying-package-unit.html, (c) https://www.parker.com/Literature/Hiross%20Zander%20Division/PDF%20Files/Bulletins/BULBIOSKID-01-EN.pdf, (d) http://methanesys.com/?page_id=69, (e) https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/technologies-equipments-biogas-dryingwater-vapor-reina-hernández/ The above webpages were accessed in the month of June 2020.
18. Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.033 ↗
19. A review of biogas utilisation, purification and upgrading technologies10.1007/s12649-016-9826-4 ↗
20. Biogas upgrading and utilization: current status and perspectives10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.01.011 ↗
21. Biogas upgrading methods: recent advancements and emerging technologies
22. Bauer · 2013 · 270 · 83
23. Alternative materials in technologies for Biogas upgrading via CO2 capture10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.198 ↗
24. Metal–organic frameworks for upgrading biogas via CO2 adsorption to biogas green energy10.1039/c3cs60244c ↗
25. The chemistry of metal–organic frameworks for CO2 capture, regeneration and conversion10.1038/natrevmats.2017.45 ↗
26. Recent advances in gas storage and separation using metal–organic frameworks10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.006 ↗
27. A microporous metal−organic framework for separation of CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 by fixed-bed adsorption10.1021/jp077618g ↗
28. Structure–property relationships of porous materials for carbon dioxide separation and capture10.1039/c2ee23201d ↗
29. Molecular simulations and theoretical predictions for adsorption and diffusion of CH4/H2 and CO2/CH4 mixtures in ZIFs10.1021/jp203053h ↗
30. Quantitative structure–property relationship models for recognizing metal organic frameworks (MOFs) with high CO2 working capacity and CO2/CH4 selectivity for methane purification10.1002/ejic.201600365 ↗
31. Natural gas upgrading using a fluorinated MOF with tuned H2S and CO2 adsorption selectivity10.1038/s41560-018-0267-0 ↗
32. A flexible pro-porous coordination polymer: non-conventional synthesis and separation properties towards CO2/CH4 mixtures10.1002/chem.200902346 ↗
33. Cation-exchange porosity tuning in anionic metal–organic frameworks for the selective separation of gases and vapors and for catalysis10.1002/ange.201003314 ↗
34. Biporous metal–organic framework with tunable CO2/CH separation performance facilitated by intrinsic flexibility10.1021/acsami.8b13362 ↗
35. Assessment of the energy consumption of the biogas upgrading process with pressure swing adsorption using novel adsorbents10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.082 ↗
36. Computational screening of porous carbons, zeolites, and metal organic frameworks for desulfurization and decarburization of biogas, natural gas, and flue gas10.1002/aic.14046 ↗
37. Computational screening of metal–organic frameworks for biogas purification10.1039/C9ME00095J ↗
38. Unlocking the effect of H2O on CO2 separation performance of promising MOFs using atomically detailed simulations10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05487 ↗
39. High-throughput screening of metal–organic frameworks for CO2 and CH4 separation in the presence of water
40. A method for screening the potential of MOFs as CO2 adsorbents in pressure swing adsorption processes10.1002/cssc.201100716 ↗
41. Nguyen · 2016 · 55 · 6201
42. A microporous, moisture-stable, and amine-functionalized metal–organic framework for highly selective separation of CO 2 from CH410.1039/C2CC16923A ↗
43. Data-driven design of metal–organic frameworks for wet flue gas CO2 capture10.1038/s41586-019-1798-7 ↗
44. A water-stable porphyrin-based metal–organic framework active for visible-light photocatalysis10.1002/anie.201202471 ↗
45. A guest-responsive fluorescent 3D microporous metal− organic framework derived from a long-lifetime pyrene core10.1021/ja906041f ↗
46. Evaluation of the BET theory for the characterization of meso and microporous MOFs10.1002/smtd.201800173 ↗
47. Estimation of isosteric heats of adsorption of single gas and multicomponent gas mixtures10.1021/ie00007a030 ↗
48. Evaluating metal–organic frameworks for natural gas storage10.1039/C3SC52633J ↗
49. A new tetrazolate zeolite-like framework for highly selective CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 separation10.1039/C4CC05729E ↗
50. Microporous metal-organic framework with potential for carbon dioxide capture at ambient conditions
51. An isoreticular series of metal–organic frameworks with dendritic hexacarboxylate ligands and exceptionally high gas-uptake capacity10.1002/ange.201001009 ↗
52. A versatile metal–organic framework for carbon dioxide capture and cooperative catalysis10.1039/c2cc34622b ↗
53. A highly water-stable meta-carborane-based copper metal–organic framework for efficient high-temperature butanol separation10.1021/jacs.0c01008 ↗
54. An aminefunctionalized MIL-53 metal− organic framework with large separation power for CO2 and CH410.1021/ja900555r ↗