journal article·2020-09Open access

Bioactive glass scaffold architectures regulate patterning of bone regeneration in vivo

Xiaomeng Shi, Amy Nommeots-Nomm, Naomi M. Todd, Aine Devlin-Mullin, Hua Geng, Peter D. Lee, Christopher A. Mitchell, Julian R. Jones

Abstract

Abstract The architecture of bone scaffolds, such as pore dimensions, connectivity and orientation can regulate osteogenic defect repair, as can their rate of degradation. Synthetic bone grafts have historically been developed with foam structures to mimic trabecular bone. Now, Additive Manufacturing techniques enable production of open and regular pore architectures with improved compressive strengths. Here, we compare two types of bioactive glass scaffolds, made of the highly biodegradable ICIE16 composition, with distinctively different architectures but matched interconnect sizes (~150 µm), produced via two different techniques: gel-cast foaming and direct ink writing. A rabbit lateral femoral defect model was used to compare the effect of their architecture on in vivo bone regeneration, relative to a defect only control group, after 4 and 10 weeks of implantation. 3D X-ray microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), correlated to histology and back-scatter electron microscopy (BS-SEM) permitted quantitative evaluation of new bone ingrowth and degradation of the scaffolds. Both foam and printed scaffolds showed equal or higher bone ingrowth compared to the control group. After 4 weeks, the foam group showed the highest osteogenesis, with 51% more bone ingrowth than the defect only controls, but after 10 weeks the defect treated with the printed scaffold had the most bone ingrowth (40% more than the empty defect). Energy dispersive X-ray (EDS) mapping revealed degradation of the glass and calcium-phosphate deposition. The foam group showed more rapid degradation than the printed group, due to higher total porosity (even though interconnected pore size was equivalent). The foam scaffold appeared to allow rapid bone ingrowth and cancellous bone formation, whereas the printed scaffold seemed to provoke cortical-like bone formation, while remaining in place for longer than the 10 week study. While the foam's concave architectures promote initial bone ingrowth, the higher strength open pore channels of the printed scaffolds are beneficial for scaffolds made of highly degradable bioactive glasses.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Stevens · Mater. Today · 2008 · 11 · 1810.1016/S1369-7021(08)70086-5 ↗
2. W Bauer · Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · 2000 · 371 · 1010.1097/00003086-200002000-00003 ↗
3. Kucera · Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. · 2012 · 22 · 12310.1007/s00590-011-0831-9 ↗
4. Younger · J. Orthop. Trauma · 1989 · 3 · 19210.1097/00005131-198909000-00002 ↗
5. Hench · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Symp. · 1971 · 2 · 11710.1002/jbm.820050611 ↗
6. Jones · Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. · 2016 · 7 · 42310.1111/ijag.12252 ↗
7. Xynos · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2001 · 55 · 15110.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<151::AID-JBM1001>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
8. Lindfors · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B · 2010 · 94B · 15710.1002/jbm.b.31636 ↗
9. Lindfors · Bone · 2010 · 47 · 21210.1016/j.bone.2010.05.030 ↗
10. Jones · Acta Biomater. · 2013 · 9 · 445710.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 ↗
11. Wu · Acta Biomater. · 2011 · 7 · 180710.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.041 ↗
12. Brink · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 1997 · 36 · 10910.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199707)36:1<109::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
13. Elgayar · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2005 · 351 · 17310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.07.067 ↗
14. Nommeots-Nomm · Acta Biomater. · 2017 · 57 · 44910.1016/j.actbio.2017.04.030 ↗
15. Feng · ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. · 2020
16. Zhang · Biomaterials · 2017 · 135 · 8510.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.005 ↗
17. Fu · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2011 · 21 · 105810.1002/adfm.201002030 ↗
18. Fu · Acta Biomater. · 2011 · 7 · 354710.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.030 ↗
19. Nommeots-Nomm · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2018 · 38 · 83710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.08.006 ↗
20. Liu · Acta Biomater. · 2013 · 9 · 488910.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.029 ↗
21. Barba · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 9 · 4172210.1021/acsami.7b14175 ↗
22. Nommeots-Nomm · Mater. Today Adv. · 2019 · 2 · 9
23. Yue · Acta Biomater. · 2011 · 7 · 263710.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.009 ↗
24. Jones · Biomaterials · 2007 · 28 · 140410.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.014 ↗
25. Atwood · Scr. Mater. · 2004 · 51 · 102910.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.08.014 ↗
26. Jones · Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A · 2006 · 364 · 26310.1098/rsta.2005.1689 ↗
27. Yue · J. Mater. Sci. · 2010 · 21 · 847
28. Midha · Acta Biomater. · 2013 · 9 · 916910.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.014 ↗
29. Geng · J. Mater. Sci. · 2016 · 27 · 9
30. Brown · Int. J. Comput. Vis. · 2007 · 74 · 5910.1007/s11263-006-0002-3 ↗
31. Recognising panorams
32. Hing · J. Mater. Sci. · 1999 · 10 · 663
33. Jones · Biomaterials · 2009 · 30 · 144010.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.056 ↗
34. Otsuki · Biomaterials · 2006 · 27 · 589210.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.013 ↗
35. Ripamonti · Matrix · 1992 · 12 · 20210.1016/S0934-8832(11)80063-6 ↗
36. Hing · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A · 2004 · 68A · 18710.1002/jbm.a.10050 ↗
37. Klar · J. Cell. Mol. Med. · 2013 · 17 · 144410.1111/jcmm.12125 ↗
38. Hing · Biomaterials · 2006 · 27 · 501410.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.039 ↗
39. Zhao · Biomaterials · 2007 · 28 · 282110.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.024 ↗
40. von Recum, A.F., and van Kooten, T.G., J. Biomed. Sci.Polymer Edition (0920-5063 (Print))
41. Hench · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1991 · 74 · 148710.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x ↗
42. Rahaman · Acta Biomater. · 2011 · 7 · 235510.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016 ↗
43. Schepers · J. Oral Rehabil. · 1997 · 24 · 17110.1111/j.1365-2842.1997.tb00311.x ↗
44. Radin, S., et al., J. Biomed. Mater. Res.(0021-9304 (Print))
45. Kim · Acta Biomater. · 2016 · 44 · 15510.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.039 ↗
46. Barradas, A.M., et al., Eur. Cells Mateir. (1473-2262 (Electronic))
47. Yoon · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2001 · 55 · 40110.1002/1097-4636(20010605)55:3<401::AID-JBM1029>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
48. Midha · Adv. Healthc Mater. · 2013
49. ten Harkel · PLoS ONE · 2015 · 1010.1371/journal.pone.0139564 ↗
50. Boonrungsiman · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. · 2012 · 109 · 1417010.1073/pnas.1208916109 ↗
51. Bone physiology, metabolism, and biomechanics