MOFs functionalization of 3D printed mullite complex architectures for CO2 capture
Source abstract
Abstract
• Complex porous mullite structures were successfully printed by Digital Light Processing. • Pure HKUST-1 crystals were synthetized by solvothermal synthesis on mullite supports. • Preliminary CO 2 adsorption tests performed under 1% CO 2 evidenced encouraging results. • Compared to HKUST-1 powder bed, functionalized 3D printed monoliths led to a CO 2 uptake increase up to 51.3%. • Three consecutive cycles of regeneration-adsorption showed almost any loss of the performances. Anthropogenic emissions of green-house gases and increasing CO 2 atmospheric concentration are considered the major causes of global warming and ocean acidification. Carbon capture and sequestration turned out to be a valuable strategy to help mitigating these problems, making it urgent to develop novel materials able to selectively capture CO 2 . Thus, in the present experimental study, a new system for CO 2 capture based on porous mullite (3Al 2 O 3 ⋅2SiO 2 ) substrates fabricated by Digital Light Processing and properly functionalized with Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs) was developed. Printable ceramic pastes were obtained by mixing in proper amounts commercial mullite powders to a photocurable commercial resin with a dispersant and a sintering additive to optimize the rheological behaviour, printability, and solid loading. Then, different geometries were successfully shaped with high accuracy: bars, pellets, as well as monoliths with two structures, grid-like and Schwartz primitive triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS). After debinding and sintering of the samples, mullite substrates were successfully functionalized with HKUST-1 (Cu 3 (BTC) 2 ) crystals by a two-step solvothermal synthesis process. HKUST-1 powders, as well as blank and coated lattice monoliths were tested in a catalytic bench reactor under 1% CO 2 flux (99% He). Before each measurement samples were heated at 120 °C for 4 h under He flux for regeneration. The samples showed an efficient CO 2 adsorption capacity, and the regeneration efficiency led to reusable and durable systems. Preliminary results showed that the TPMS structure was a more efficient substrate than grid-like architecture for capturing CO 2 , because of its higher surface area. Thus, this study demonstrates how the combination between additive manufacturing and MOFs technologies can set the stage to produce efficient engineered systems for CO 2 capture.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases. https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/, 2024 (accessed 30 August 2024).
2. How Do We Know the Build-Up of Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere is Caused By humans? , https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/how-do-we-know-build-carbon-dioxide-atmosphere-caused-humans 2024 (accessed 30 August 2024).
3. 2023 · 35
4. Paris agreement. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-7 2015 (accessed 30 August 2024).
5. Energy Technology Perspectives 2020, Special Report on Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage, CCUS in Clean Energy Transitions. https://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/, https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/181b48b4-323f-454d-96fb-0bb1889d96a9/CCUS_in_clean_energy_transitions.pdf, 2020 (Accessed 30 August 2024).
6. A review on production of metal organic frameworks (MOF) for CO2 adsorption10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135090 ↗
7. Carbon dioxide adsorption based on porous materials10.1039/D0RA10902A ↗
8. Metal-organic frameworks with exceptionally high capacity for storage of carbon dioxide at room temperature10.1021/ja0570032 ↗
9. Detection of Pb2+ in Tea Using Aptamer Labeled with AIEgen Nanospheres Based on MOFs Sensors10.3390/bios12090745 ↗
10. Postsynthesis strategy of functional Zn-MOF sensors for the detection of ClO-and DPA10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c03468 ↗
11. Electron transfer facilitated by π-π stacking during the nitrobenzene recognition process of an MOF sensor10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02942 ↗
12. Fabrication of metal-doped BiOI/MOF composite photocatalysts with enhanced photocatalytic performance10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.254 ↗
13. Rational Construction of Light-Driven Catalysts For CO2 Reduction10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00285 ↗
14. Noble-metal-free CdS/Ni-MOF composites with highly efficient charge separation for photocatalytic H2 evolution10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146356 ↗
15. Conductive Metal–Organic Frameworks For Supercapacitors10.1002/adma.202200999 ↗
16. Review of Pristine Metal-Organic Frameworks for Supercapacitors: Recent Progress and Perspectives10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01722 ↗
17. Two-dimensional metal-organic framework nanosheets grown on carbon fiber paper interwoven with polyaniline as an electrode for supercapacitors10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c03170 ↗
18. Kinetic, process modeling, and techno-economic analysis of a diamine-appended metal-organic framework for CO2 capture using fixed bed contactors10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04359 ↗
19. Metal-organic framework (MOF)—A universal material for biomedicine10.3390/ijms24097819 ↗
20. The synthesis and functionalization of metal organic frameworks and their applications for the selective separation of proteins/peptides10.1007/s00216-023-04843-z ↗
21. Construction of Tb-MOF-on-Fe-MOF conjugate as a novel platform for ultrasensitive detection of carbohydrate antigen 125 and living cancer cells10.1016/j.bios.2019.111536 ↗
22. Preparation of highly water stable HKUST-1@Pyr composites for excellent CO2 capture capability and efficient separation of CO2/N210.1016/j.inoche.2023.111252 ↗
23. High efficiency synthesis of HKUST-1 under mild conditions with high BET surface area and CO2 uptake capacity10.1016/j.pnsc.2018.08.002 ↗
24. Synthesis and characterization of porous HKUST-1 metal organic frameworks for hydrogen storage10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.105 ↗
25. Local structure of framework Cu(II) in HKUST-1 metallorganic framework: Spectroscopic characterization upon activation and interaction with adsorbates10.1021/cm052191g ↗
26. HKUST-1 Supported on Zirconium Phosphate as an Efficient Catalyst for Solvent Free Oxidation of Cyclohexene: DFT Study10.3390/catal8110546 ↗
27. M. Todaro, G. Buscarino, L. Sciortino, A. Alessi, F. Messina, M. Taddei, M. Ranocchiari, M. Cannas, F.M. Gelardi, Decomposition Process of Carboxylate MOF HKUST-1 Unveiled at the Atomic Scale Level, J. Phys. Chem. C. 120 (23) (2016) 12879–12889. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03237.10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03237 ↗
28. J. Sun, M. Shang, M. Zhang, S. Yu, Z. Yuan, X. Yi, S. Filatov, J. Zhang, Konjac glucomannan/cellulose nanofibers composite aerogel supported HKUST-1 for CO2 adsorption, Carbohydr. Polym. 293 (2022)119720. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119720.10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119720 ↗
29. S. Park, J. Ryu, H.Y. Cho, D. Sohn,Halloysite nanotubes loaded with HKUST-1 for CO 2 adsorption, Colloids. Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 651 (2022)129750. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129750.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129750 ↗
30. J. Cortés-Súarez, V. Celis-Arias, H.I. Beltrán, A. Tejeda-Cruz, I.A. Ibarra, J.E. Romero-Ibarra, E. Sánchez-González, S. Loera-Serna, Synthesis and Characterization of an SWCNT@HKUST-1 Composite: Enhancing the CO 2 Adsorption Properties of HKUST-1, ACS Omega. 4 (3) (2019) 5275–5282. doi:10.1021/acsomega.9b00330.10.1021/acsomega.9b00330 ↗
31. F. Xu, Y. Yu, J. Yan, Q, Xia, H. Wang, J. Li, Z. Li,Ultrafast room temperature synthesis of GrO@HKUST-1 composites with high CO2 adsorption capacity and CO2/N2 adsorption selectivity, Chem. Eng. J. 303 (2016) 231–237. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.143.10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.143 ↗
32. N. Al-Janabi, P. Hill, L. Torrente-Murciano, A. Garforth, P. Gorgoja, F. Siperstein, X. Fan, Mapping the Cu-BTC metal-organic framework (HKUST-1) stability envelope in the presence of water vapour for CO2 adsorption from flue gases, Chem. Eng. J. 281 (2015) 669–677. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.020.10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.020 ↗
33. Extremely enhanced CO2 uptake by HKUST-1 metal-organic framework via a simple chemical treatment10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.09.009 ↗
34. S. Ye, X. Jiang, L.-W.Ruan, B. Liu, Y.-M. Wang, J.-F. Zhu, L.-G. Qiu, Post-combustion CO2 capture with the HKUST-1 and MIL-101(Cr) metal-organic frameworks: Adsorption, separation and regeneration investigations, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 179 (2013) 191–197. doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.06.007.10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.06.007 ↗
35. High pressure adsorption of hydrogen, nitrogen, carbon dioxide and methane on the metal-organic framework HKUST-110.1016/j.micromeso.2010.09.013 ↗
36. CO2/H2O adsorption equilibrium and rates on metal-organic frameworks: HKUST-1 and Ni/DOBDC10.1021/la102359q ↗
37. Efficient Removal of Low Concentration Methyl Mercaptan By HKUST-1 Membrane Constructed On Porous Alumina Granules10.1039/C7CE01922J ↗
38. Metallo Organic Molecular Sieve For Gas Separation and Purification10.1016/S1387-1811(02)00405-5 ↗
39. Quantum mechanical basis for kinetic diameters of small gaseous molecules10.1021/jp412588f ↗
40. T. Ghanbari, F. Abnisa, W.M.A. Wan Daud, A review on production of metal organic frameworks (MOF) for CO2 adsorption, Sci. Total Environ. 707 (2020) 135090. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135090.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135090 ↗
41. Shaping of Metal-Organic Frameworks: A Review10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c03426 ↗
42. Development of 3D-Printed Polymer-MOF Monoliths for CO2 Adsorption10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05445 ↗
43. 3D-Printed Metal-Organic Framework Monoliths for Gas Adsorption Processes10.1021/acsami.7b11626 ↗
44. 3D-Printing of Pure Metal-Organic Framework Monoliths10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00069 ↗
45. S. Lawson, A.A. Alwakwak, A.A. Rownaghi, F. Rezaei, Gel-Print-Grow: A New Way of 3D Printing Metal-Organic Frameworks, ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 12 (50) (2020) 56108–56117. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c18720.10.1021/acsami.0c18720 ↗
46. 3D-Printed Zeolite Monoliths for CO2 Removal from Enclosed Environments10.1021/acsami.6b09647 ↗
47. Solvothermal and electrochemical synthetic method of HKUST-1 and its methane storage capacity10.1088/1757-899X/107/1/012030 ↗
48. Incorporating Metal–Organic Frameworks Into Substrates for Environmental Applications10.1016/j.cej.2022.136866 ↗
49. Emerging 3D-printed zeolitic gas adsorbents10.36922/msam.1880 ↗
50. Metal-organic frameworks in monolithic structures10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03824.x ↗
51. Synthesis of continuous MOF-5 membranes on porous α-alumina substrates10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.08.054 ↗
52. Oriented crystallisation on supports and anisotropic mass transport of the metal-organic framework manganese formate10.1002/ejic.200600698 ↗
53. MOF immobilization on the surface of polymer-cordierite composite monoliths through in-situ crystal growth10.1016/j.seppur.2017.03.072 ↗
54. Development of ceramic-MOF filters from aluminum saline slags for capturing CO210.1016/j.powtec.2023.118962 ↗
55. MOF@Cell: 3D printed biobased filters anchored with a green metal-organic framework for effluent treatment10.1039/D3TA01757E ↗
56. Assembling 99% MOFs into Bioinspired Rigid-Flexible Coupled Membrane with Significant Permeability: The Impacts of Defects10.1002/smll.202306528 ↗
57. Mechanical stability of ZSM-5 zeolite washcoated cordierite monoliths10.1016/j.cherd.2021.02.026 ↗
58. Zeolite imidazolate framework (ZIF)-based mixed matrix membranes for CO2 separation: A review10.1002/app.48968 ↗
59. Optimizing Washcoating Conditions for the Preparation of Zeolite-Based Cordierite Monoliths for NOx CH4-SCR: A Required Step for Real Application10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01216 ↗
60. Synthesis and toluene adsorption/desorption property of beta zeolite coated on cordierite honeycomb by an in situ crystallization method10.1002/ceat.200800260 ↗
61. Preparation of Pt/beta zeolite-Al2O3/cordierite monolith for automobile exhaust purification10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.09.035 ↗
62. Washcoating of different zeolites on cordierite monoliths10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02032.x ↗
63. Monolith-Supported Amine-Functionalized Mg2(dobpdc) Adsorbents for CO2 Capture10.1021/acsami.7b02035 ↗
64. Silane functionalized open-celled ceramic foams as support structure in metal organic framework composite materials10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.10.011 ↗
65. U. Betke, M. Klaus, J.G. Eggebrecht, M. Scheffler, A. Lieb, MOFs meet macropores: Dynamic direct crystallization of the microporous aluminum isophthalate CAU-10 on reticulated open-cellular alumina foams, Microp. Mesopor. Mater. 265 (2018) 43–56. doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.01.020.10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.01.020 ↗
66. Controlling the size and shape of Mg-MOF-74 crystals to optimise film synthesis on alumina substrates10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.05.058 ↗
67. MOF-74 and UTSA-16 film growth on monolithic structures and their CO2 adsorption performance10.1016/j.cej.2016.11.058 ↗
68. Manufacture of dense coatings of Cu3(BTC)2 (HKUST-1) on α-alumina10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.11.014 ↗
69. Catalytic activity of HKUST-1 coated on ceramic foam10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.12.055 ↗
70. Y. Chen, N. Wang, O. Ola, Y. Xia, Y. Zhu, Porous ceramics: Light in weight but heavy in energy and environment technologies, Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep.143 (2021) 100589. doi:10.1016/j.mser.2020.100589.10.1016/j.mser.2020.100589 ↗
71. The properties of foams and lattices
72. J. Feng, J. Fu, X. Yao, Y. He, Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) Porous structures: From multi-Scale design, Precise Additive Manufacturing to Multidisciplinary Applications, Int. J. Extrem Manuf. 4 (2022) 022001. doi:10.1088/2631-7990/ac5be6.10.1088/2631-7990/ac5be6 ↗
73. L. Zhang, Z. Hu, M.Y. Wang, S. Feih, Hierarchical sheet triply periodic minimal surface lattices: Design, geometric and mechanical performance, Mater. Des. 209 (2021) 109931. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109931.10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109931 ↗
74. 3D printing of TPMS structural ZnO ceramics with good mechanical properties10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.01.152 ↗
75. Effects of design, porosity and biodegradation on mechanical and morphological properties of additive-manufactured triply periodic minimal surface scaffolds10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104064 ↗
76. 3D-printed ceramic triply periodic minimal surface structures for design of functionally graded bone implants10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108602 ↗
77. C. Pan, Y. Han, J. Lu, Design and Optimization of Lattice structures: A review, Appl. Sci. 10 (18)(2020) 6374. doi:10.3390/app10186374.10.3390/app10186374 ↗
78. Additive Manufacturing of Tailored Macroporous Ceramic Structures for High-Temperature Applications10.1002/adem.202070035 ↗
79. Investigation of functionally graded TPMS structures fabricated by additive manufacturing10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108021 ↗
80. Multifunctional Mechanical Metamaterials Based on Triply Periodic Minimal Surface
81. Three-Dimensional Printing of Hierarchical Porous Architectures10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02761 ↗
82. Additive Manufacturing of Advanced Ceramic Materials,10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100736 ↗
83. Additive manufacturing of ceramic-based materials10.1002/adem.201400097 ↗
84. Additive Manufacturing of Ceramics: Issues, Potentialities, and Opportunities10.1111/jace.13700 ↗
85. Lithography-based additive manufacturing of ceramics: Materials, applications and perspectives10.1557/s43579-023-00444-0 ↗
86. T. Lube, M. Staudacher, A.K. Hofer, J. Schlacher, R. Bermejo, Stereolithographic 3D Printing of Ceramics: Challenges and Opportunities for Structural Integrity, 25 (7)(2023) 2200520. doi:10.1002/adem.202200520.10.1002/adem.202200520 ↗
87. Digital Light Processing of ceramics: an Overview On process, Materials and Challenges10.1007/s40964-022-00379-3 ↗
88. Photopolymerization-based Additive Manufacturing of ceramics: A systematic Review10.1007/s40145-021-0468-z ↗
89. 3D-printing of adsorbents for increased productivity in carbon capture applications (3D-CAPS)10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103512 ↗
90. Microstructural characteristics, properties, synthesis and applications of mullite: a review10.1590/0366-69132022683853184 ↗
91. Combined effects of SiO2 ratio and purity on physical properties and microstructure of in situ alumina-mullite ceramic10.1111/ijac.13733 ↗
92. H. Schneider, R.X. Fischer, J. Schreuer, Mullite: Crystal Structure and Related Properties, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 98 (10) (2015) 2948–2967. doi:10.1111/jace.13817.10.1111/jace.13817 ↗
93. Reaction and Sintering Mechanisms of Mullite in the Systems Cristobalite/a-Al2O3 and Amorphous SiO2/a-Al2O310.1016/0955-2219(96)00023-4 ↗
94. Digital light processing additive manufacturing of in situ mullite-zirconia composites10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.06.042 ↗
95. Additive manufacturing of electrofused mullite slurry by digital light processing10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.07.005 ↗
96. Digital light processing fabrication of mullite component derived from preceramic precusor using photosensitive hydroxysiloxane as the matrix and alumina nanoparticles as the filler10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.04.051 ↗
97. Complex mullite structures fabricated via digital light processing of a preceramic polysiloxane with active alumina fillers10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.038 ↗
98. Mullite ceramic fabrication by 3D printing
99. Mullite 3D Printed Humidity Sensors10.3390/ceramics7020053 ↗
100. Sintering of Industrial Mullites10.1016/S0955-2219(97)00043-5 ↗