Coupling machine learning with 3D bioprinting to fast track optimisation of extrusion printing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract 3D bioprinting, a paradigm shift in tissue engineering holds a promising perspective for regenerative medicine and disease modelling. 3D scaffolds are fabricated for subsequent cell seeding or incorporated directly to the bioink to create cell-laden 3D constructs. A plethora of factors relating to bioink properties, printing parameters and post print curing play a significant role in the optimisation of the printing process. Although qualitative evaluation of printability has been investigated largely, there is a paucity of studies on quantitative approaches to assess printability. Hence, this study explores machine learning as a novel tool to evaluate printability quantitatively and to fast track optimisation of extrusion printing in achieving a reproducible 3D scaffold. Bayesian Optimisation, a machine learning method has been employed for optimising 3D bioplotting with a scoring system established to assess the printability of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) and hyaluronic acid methacrylate (HAMA) bioinks. The performance of two fundamental criteria encountered in the printing process: the filament formation of the bioink and the layer stacking of the 3D scaffold have been incorporated in the scoring metric. The optimal print parameters for GelMA containing inks with ranging concentrations (10%, 7.5% & 5% (w/v)) were obtained in 19, 4 & 47 experiments whereas for GelMA:HAMA (10:2%, 7.5:2% & 5:2% (w/v)) 32, 25 & 32 experiments were required respectively. This number of experiments is drastically reduced compared to the 6000 to 10 000 possible combinations in the Bayesian algorithm. Hence, this study will be a stepping-stone into unravelling the benefits of machine learning in this rapidly developing area of 3D bioprinting.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Organ printing: computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00033-7 ↗
2. Review: bioprinting: a beginning10.1089/ten.2006.12.631 ↗
3. Starly · 2015 · 57
4. Rapid prototyping of scaffolds derived from thermoreversible hydrogels and tailored for applications in tissue engineering10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00139-4 ↗
5. 3D Printed Cartilage‐Like Tissue Constructs with Spatially Controlled Mechanical Properties
6. Vascularized 3D printed scaffolds for promoting bone regeneration10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.033 ↗
7. Liver tissue engineering as an emerging alternative for liver disease treatment10.1089/ten.teb.2019.0233 ↗
8. Human skin 3D bioprinting using scaffold-free approach10.1002/adhm.201601101 ↗
9. Recent advances in 3D printing: vascular network for tissue and organ regeneration10.1016/j.trsl.2019.04.002 ↗
10. The bioink: a comprehensive review on bioprintable materials10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006 ↗
11. Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020 ↗
12. Advanced bioinks for 3D printing: a materials science perspective10.1007/s10439-016-1638-y ↗
13. Gelatin-methacrylamide hydrogels as potential biomaterials for fabrication of tissue-engineered cartilage constructs10.1002/mabi.201200471 ↗
14. Optimization of gelatin-alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach10.1088/1758-5090/aacdc7 ↗
15. Research on the printability of hydrogels in 3D bioprinting10.1038/srep29977 ↗
16. Expert-guided optimization for 3D printing of soft and liquid materials10.1371/journal.pone.0194890 ↗
17. Light-induced crosslinking polymerization10.1002/pi.821 ↗
18. Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00240-X ↗
19. Thermosensitive sol-gel reversible hydrogels10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00242-3 ↗
20. Tailoring the mechanical properties of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels through manipulation of the photocrosslinking conditions10.1039/C7SM02187A ↗
21. Bio-ink properties and printability for extrusion printing living cells10.1039/c3bm00012e ↗
22. The influence of printing parameters on cell survival rate and printability in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045002 ↗
23. Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8 ↗
24. Characterization of the flow behavior of alginate/hydroxyapatite mixtures for tissue scaffold fabrication10.1088/1758-5082/1/4/045005 ↗
25. Predictive modeling of droplet formation processes in inkjet-based bioprinting
26. Multi-objective optimization design through machine learning for drop-on-demand bioprinting10.1016/j.eng.2018.12.009 ↗
27. Bayesian optimization for adaptive experimental design: a review10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2966228 ↗
28. Rapid bayesian optimisation for synthesis of short polymer fiber materials10.1038/s41598-017-05723-0 ↗
29. Frazier · 2016
30. Gaussian process optimization in the bandit setting: no regret and experimental design
31. Development of the Biopen: a handheld device for surgical printing of adipose stem cells at a chondral wound site10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/015019 ↗
32. Rasmussen · 2006
33. E. Brochu, V. Cora, N. Freitas, A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization of Expensive Cost Functions, with Application to Active User Modeling and Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning, ArXiv, abs/1012.2599 (2010).
34. Process-constrained batch Bayesian optimisation, Neural Information Processing Systems
35. On low-concentration inks formulated by nanocellulose assisted with Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) for 3D printing toward wound healing application10.1021/acsami.8b21268 ↗
36. Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032002 ↗