journal article·2026-06

Delamination Defect Identification in CFRP Laminates using Improved Elliptical Localization and Lamb Wave Probabilistic Imaging

Yuan Chen, Wenbin Liu, Binqiang Huang, Guangming Zhang, Xiang Wan, Ming Dong, Xin Su

Applied Composite Materials· Volume 33· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) is widely used in aerospace and other industrial fields due to its high strength-to-weight ratio, excellent temperature and corrosion resistance. However, manufacturing-induced delamination defects can seriously compromise structural integrity, making nondestructive evaluation (NDE) essential. This paper proposes an improved defect identification method that combines an enhanced elliptical localization algorithm with Lamb wave-based probabilistic imaging for promising delamination identification in CFRP laminates under the tested conditions. First, the dispersion curves of Lamb waves are calculated using the 1D-GLL-SAFE method in SAFEDC software, and S0/A0 modal wave velocity radar maps are generated to visualize directional dependence in the anisotropic structure. Finite element models with controlled delamination defects are then established in ABAQUS to simulate Lamb wave propagation and defect interaction. Simulation results show absolute localization errors of 3.91 mm and 3.61 mm, with relative errors of 1.85% and 2.55%. An experimental setup incorporating ultrasonic excitation and fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensing is developed to test CFRP specimens with pre-embedded defects. Experimental results demonstrate the method’s accuracy, with absolute errors of 2.84 mm and 3.82 mm, corresponding to relative errors of 1.34% and 2.71%. This study provides a validated, integrated solution for high-precision nondestructive testing (NDT) and localization of delamination defects in CFRP structures through simulations and experiments.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhang, J., Lin, G., Vaidya, U., et al.: Past, present and future prospective of global carbon fiber composite developments and applications[J]. Compos. Part. B: Eng. 250, 110463 (2023)10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110463 ↗
2. Li, N., Li, Y., Jelonnek, J., et al.: A new process control method for microwave curing of carbon fiber reinforced composites in aerospace applications[J]. Compos. Part. B: Eng. 122, 61–70 (2017)10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.009 ↗
3. Das, T.K., Ghosh, P., Das, N.C.: Preparation, development, outcomes, and application versatility of carbon fiber-based polymer composites: a review[J]. Adv. Compos. Hybrid. Mater. 2, 214–233 (2019)10.1007/s42114-018-0072-z ↗
4. Hermansson, F., Heimersson, S., Janssen, M., et al.: Can carbon fiber composites have a lower environmental impact than fiberglass?[J]. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 181, 106234 (2022)10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106234 ↗
5. Zimmermann, N., Wang, P.H.: A review of failure modes and fracture analysis of aircraft composite materials[J]. Eng. Fail. Anal. 115, 104692 (2020)10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104692 ↗
6. Guo, K., Liu, X., Ren, Y., et al.: Experimental study on crashworthiness and failure mechanisms of aeronautical multi-fibers hybrid composite corrugated structures with Carbon, Glass, Kevlar[J]. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 142(A), 108599 (2023)10.1016/j.ast.2023.108599 ↗
7. Xu, X., Dai, T., Luo, J., et al.: Detectability of delamination in laminated CFRPs with diverse stacking sequences using eddy current method with T-R pancake coil[J]. NDT & E International. 136, 102814 (2023)10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102814 ↗
8. Gupta, M., Khan, M.A., Butola, R., et al.: Advances in applications of Non-Destructive Testing (NDT): A review[J]. Adv. Mater. Process. Technol. 8(2), 2286–2307 (2022)
9. Han, S., Li, Q., Cui, Z., et al.: Non-destructive testing and structural health monitoring technologies for carbon fiber reinforced polymers: A review[J]. Nondestructive Test. Evaluation. 39(4), 725–761 (2024)10.1080/10589759.2024.2324149 ↗
10. Wang, B., He, P., Kang, Y., et al.: Ultrasonic testing of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites[J]. J. Sens. 2022(1), 5462237 (2022)
11. Wang, B., Zhong, S., Lee, T.L., et al.: Non-destructive testing and evaluation of composite materials/structures: A state-of-the-art review[J]. Adv. Mech. Eng. 12(4), 1687814020913761 (2020)10.1177/1687814020913761 ↗
12. Spytek, J., Mrowka, J., Pieczonka, L., et al.: Multi-resolution non-contact damage detection in complex-shaped composite laminates using ultrasound[J]. NDT & E International. 116, 102366. (2020)10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102366 ↗
13. Hassani, S., Dackermann, U.: A systematic review of advanced sensor technologies for non-destructive testing and structural health monitoring[J]. Sensors. 23(4), 2204 (2023)10.3390/s23042204 ↗
14. Chen, J., Yu, Z., Jin, H.: Nondestructive testing and evaluation techniques of defects in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A review[J]. Front. Mater. 9, 986645 (2022)10.3389/fmats.2022.986645 ↗
15. Ramalho, G.M.F., Lopes, A.M., da Silva L: F M. Structural health monitoring of adhesive joints using Lamb waves: A review[J]. Struct. Control Health Monit. 29(1), e2849 (2022)10.1002/stc.2849 ↗
16. He, J., Guan, X., Peng, T., et al.: A multi-feature integration method for fatigue crack detection and crack length estimation in riveted lap joints using Lamb waves[J]. Smart Mater. Struct. 22(10), 105007 (2013)10.1088/0964-1726/22/10/105007 ↗
17. He, J., Huo, H., Guan, X., et al.: A Lamb wave quantification model for inclined cracks with experimental validation[J]. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 34(2), 601–611 (2021)10.1016/j.cja.2020.02.010 ↗
18. Rheinfurth, M., Kosmann, N., Sauer, D., et al.: Lamb waves for non-contact fatigue state evaluation of composites under various mechanical loading conditions[J]. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manufac. 43(8), 1203–1211 (2012)10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.021 ↗
19. Su, Z., Ye, L., Lu, Y.: Guided Lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: A review[J]. J. Sound Vib. 295(3–5), 753–780 (2006)10.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.020 ↗
20. Velsor, J.K.V., Gao, H., Rose, J.L.: Guided-wave tomographic imaging of defects in pipe using a probabilistic reconstruction algorithm[J]. Insight-Non-Destructive Test. Condition Monit. 49(9), 532–537 (2007)10.1784/insi.2007.49.9.532 ↗
21. Sun, L., Wei, J., Peng, C., et al.: Modified lamb wave delay factor-based multiply–sum probabilistic diagnostic imaging algorithm of composite structures[J]. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 72, 6004713 (2023)
22. Meng, L., Guo, Z., Ma, C.: Research on multiple damage localisation based on fusion of the Lamb wave ellipse algorithm and RAPID algorithm[J]. Insight-Non-Destructive Test. Condition Monit. 66(1), 34–40 (2024)10.1784/insi.2024.66.1.34 ↗
23. Chen, X., Hua, T.: Optimised shape factor for ultrasonic Lamb wave damage probability imaging[J]. Acoust. Electron. Eng. 3, 48–53 (2024)
24. Lu, H., Haris, M., Cantero-Chinchilla, S., et al.: Uncertainty-quantified unsupervised transfer learning for ultrasonic-based corrosion detection in underwater steel pipes[J]. Autom. Constr. 178, 106385 (2025)10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106385 ↗
25. Huo, H., He, J., Guan, X.: A Bayesian fusion method for composite damage identification using Lamb wave[J]. Struct. Health Monit. 20(5), 2337–2359 (2021)10.1177/1475921720945000 ↗
26. Michaels, J.E.: Detection, localization and characterization of damage in plates with an in situ array of spatially distributed ultrasonic sensors[J]. Smart Mater. Struct. 17(3), 035035 (2008)10.1088/0964-1726/17/3/035035 ↗
27. Flynn, E.B., Todd, M.D.: A Bayesian approach to optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring with application to active sensing[J]. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 24(4), 891–903 (2010)10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.09.003 ↗
28. Kudela, P., Radzieński, M., Ostachowicz, W.: Identification of cracks in thin-walled structures by means of wavenumber filtering[J]. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 50, 456–466 (2015)10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.05.041 ↗
29. Yue, N., Aliabadi, M.H.: Hierarchical approach for uncertainty quantification and reliability assessment of guided wave-based structural health monitoring[J]. Struct. Health Monit. 20(5), 2274–2299 (2021)10.1177/1475921720940642 ↗
30. Liu, M., Li, L., Zhang, Y., et al.: Dispersion of guided waves in complex waveguides: a hybrid modeling technique combining Gauss-Lobatto-Legendre node collation and semi-analytical finite element method[J]. Int. J. Appl. Mech. 14(08), 2250085 (2022)10.1142/S1758825122500855 ↗
31. Sharma, R., Mahajan, P., Mittal, R.K.: Fiber bundle push-out test and image-based finite element simulation for 3D carbon/carbon composites[J]. Carbon. 50(8), 2717–2725 (2012)10.1016/j.carbon.2012.02.030 ↗
32. Lu, H., Zheng, G., Hua, Y., et al.: Prediction of the Residual stiffness of composite materials under random vibration loading using a combined probabilistic random forest and probabilistic stiffness model[J]. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part. A: Civil Eng. 11(2), 04025017 (2025)10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1556 ↗
33. Lu, H., Cantero-Chinchilla, S., Yang, X., et al.: Deep learning uncertainty quantification for ultrasonic damage identification in composite structures[J]. Compos. Struct. 338, 118087 (2024)10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118087 ↗