Comparative Performance of Threaded Inserts in Fiber-Reinforced Composite Laminates under Static and Fatigue Pull-Out Loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Due to the weak interlaminar strength of fiber-reinforced composite laminates, directly tapping threads into the laminate is generally not recommended. In monolithic composite laminates where through-bolting or sandwich-panel potting is not feasible, threaded inserts are commonly used to achieve reliable fastening and maintain structural integrity. Various insert types are commercially available, and selecting the appropriate configuration is critical for achieving robust joint performance. To compare the performance of different insert concepts, seven configurations were evaluated: a direct-threaded laminate, barbed inserts, screw-to-expand inserts, tapping inserts, tapping inserts with adhesive, inserts embedded during laminate fabrication, and embedded metal blocks tapped after cure. Static pull-out tests showed that press-fit type inserts (barbed and screw-to-expand) showed significantly lower strength, with the embedded metal block performing the worst overall. Among all types, the embedded insert demonstrated the highest pull-out capacity. Flexural pull-out fatigue tests were then conducted on the threaded and embedded inserts to assess durability under repeated loading. A custom flexural pull-out fatigue fixture was developed, and the results showed that the tapping insert with adhesive provided the greatest fatigue resistance. These findings offer practical guidance on the selection and use of threaded inserts in composite laminates, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each insert family and informing design choices for improved structural reliability and long-term performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Engineering and Materials Science Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Soutis, C.: Fibre reinforced composites in aircraft construction. Prog Aerosp. Sci. 41, 143–151 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.00410.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.004 ↗
2. CMH-17-3G ed: Composite Materials Handbook, Volume 3: Polymer Matrix Composites—Materials Usage, Design, and Analysis. SAE International, Warrendale, PA (2012)
3. Catalanotti, G., Camanho, P.P., Ghys, P., Marques, A.T.: Experimental and numerical study of fastener pull-through failure in GFRP laminates. Compos. Struct. 94, 239–245 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.06.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2011.06.021 ↗
4. Thoppul, S.D., Finegan, J., Gibson, R.F.: Mechanics of mechanically fastened joints in polymer–matrix composite structures: A review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 69, 301–329 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.03710.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.037 ↗
5. Kelly, G., Hallström, S.: Strength and failure mechanisms of composite laminates subject to localised transverse loading. Compos. Struct. 69, 301–314 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.008 ↗
6. Ravichandran, B., Balasubramanian, M.: Joining methods for Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) composites − A critical review. Compos. Part Appl. Sci. Manuf. 186, 108394 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10839410.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108394 ↗
7. Camanho, P.P., Matthews, F.L.: Stress analysis and strength prediction of mechanically fastened joints in FRP: a review. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 28, 529–547 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00004-310.1016/S1359-835X(97)00004-3 ↗
8. Camanho, P.P., Lambert, M.: A design methodology for mechanically fastened joints in laminated composite materials. Compos. Sci. Technol. 66, 3004–3020 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.017 ↗
9. Das, R.R., Pradhan, B.: Delamination damage analysis of laminated bonded tubular single lap joint made of fiber-reinforced polymer composite. Int. J. Damage Mech. 23, 772–790 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/105678951351319910.1177/1056789513513199 ↗
10. Kupski, J., Teixeira De Freitas, S.: Design of adhesively bonded lap joints with laminated CFRP adherends: Review, challenges and new opportunities for aerospace structures. Compos. Struct. 268, 113923 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11392310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113923 ↗
11. Budhe, S., Banea, M.D., De Barros, S., Da Silva, L.F.M.: An updated review of adhesively bonded joints in composite materials. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 72, 30–42 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.010 ↗
12. Castro Pires, V.D., Carbas, R.J.C., Marques, E.A.S., da Silva, L.F.M.: Delamination prevention of composite joints with asymmetric CFRP adherends. J. Compos. Mater. 58, 1015–1029 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998324123106210.1177/00219983241231062 ↗
13. Katnam, K.B., Da Silva, L.F.M., Young, T.M.: Bonded repair of composite aircraft structures: A review of scientific challenges and opportunities. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 61, 26–42 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.03.00310.1016/j.paerosci.2013.03.003 ↗
14. Damghani, M., Saad Khan, M., Atkinson, G.A.: Experimental study of bonded, bolted, and hybrid bonded-bolted single-lap shear joints with woven CFRP adherends. Compos. Struct. 334, 117989 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11798910.1016/j.compstruct.2024.117989 ↗
15. Bodjona, K., Lessard, L.: Hybrid bonded-fastened joints and their application in composite structures: A general review. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 35, 764–781 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441562729610.1177/0731684415627296 ↗
16. Hocheng, H., Tsao, C.C.: The path towards delamination-free drilling of composite materials. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 167, 251–264 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.03910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.039 ↗
17. Abrão, A.M., Faria, P.E., Rubio, J.C.C., Reis, P., Davim, J.P.: Drilling of fiber reinforced plastics: A review. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 186, 1–7 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.14610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.146 ↗
18. International, A.S.T.M.: ASTM D7332/D7332M-23: Standard Test Method for Measuring Fastener Pull-Through Resistance of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Matrix Composite. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2023)
19. Davim, J.P., Reis, P.: Drilling carbon fiber reinforced plastics manufactured by autoclave—experimental and statistical study. Mater. Des. 24, 315–324 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3069(03)00062-110.1016/S0261-3069(03)00062-1 ↗
20. Can, A., Meram, A.: Dynamic behavior of screwed joints for CFRP composite laminate structures under impact loading. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 75, 232–242 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.01.01610.1016/j.jmapro.2022.01.016 ↗
21. He, R., Yang, T., Liu, S., Zhang, P., Liu, C., Yuan, W., Du, Y.: Study of the tensile mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of CFRP screwed joints. J. Compos. Mater. 58, 1815–1828 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998324124923410.1177/00219983241249234 ↗
22. Carrai, E.M., Prato, A., Anghileri, M.: Threaded inserts pull-through behaviour in carbon-epoxy thick laminates. Compos. Struct. 173, 86–95 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.10110.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.101 ↗
23. Daynes, S., Tran, L.Q.N., Ming, A.Y.W., Canturri, C., Feih, S.: Design and strength optimisation of inserts embedded into fibre reinforced laminates. Compos. Struct. 294, 115744 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11574410.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115744 ↗
24. Meram, A., Can, A.: Experimental investigation of screwed joints capabilities for the CFRP composite laminates. Composites Part B: Engineering 176, 107142 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10714210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107142 ↗
25. NASA: NASA-STD-5020B: Requirements for Threaded Fastening Systems in Spaceflight Hardware. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC (2021)