Development of Experimental Methods for Characterization of Fluid-Filled Sandwich Core Composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Fluid-filled sandwich core composites (FFSCCs)—inspired by the porous, fluid-filled bone structure of the mammalian skull—show promise for multifunctional aerospace applications combining structural efficiency with rate-dependent energy dissipation. However, no standardized test method exists to characterize these materials because conventional sandwich composite tests cannot retain interstitial fluid during mechanical loading. This study presents the development and validation of a biaxial clamped plate flexure (BCPF) test specifically designed to overcome fluid retention challenges in porous-core composites. The test employs mechanical edge sealing through a bolted flange fixture, a 3D-printed core enclosure with integrated fluid ports, and post-lamination fluid filling to enable characterization across loading rates from quasistatic to dynamic regimes. Analytical plate equations for clamped-edge, cross-ply laminates—extended to calculate layer-wise load contributions through a core foundation model—enable direct extraction of flexural properties from measured load-displacement data. Finite element analysis incorporating shell theory, nonlinear foam constitutive models, and Biot’s poroelasticity provides validation of both the analytical framework and experimental boundary conditions. Quasistatic testing (15 mm/min) of Kevlar/Tyvek/polyurethane-foam FFSCC samples in both dry and water-filled conditions demonstrate successful fluid retention throughout loading to failure, with no observed leakage. Experimental load-displacement curves match FEA predictions within 10%, while digital image correlation of surface strain fields validates the near-ideal clamped boundary condition (RMS error < 8%). At quasistatic rates, fluid inclusion produces a modest 3% increase in flexural modulus accompanied by 52% greater core compression, confirming theoretical predictions that minimal pore pressure develops at low strain rates. This quasistatic baseline—where fluid effects are minimized—provides essential validation of the test method and analytical framework, enabling future investigation of rate-dependent strengthening mechanisms at higher loading rates where fluid viscous resistance becomes significant. The validated BCPF test establishes a systematic methodology for characterizing fluid-structure coupling in porous-core composites, applicable to FFSCCs and related multifunctional material systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics · Elasticity and Material Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Betts, J., DeSaix, P., et al.: Anatomy and Physiology (2013)
2. Matthews, J., Shock and vibration characteristics of a bio-inspired structure under blast loading. Thesis, M.S.: New Mexico Tech, (2008). https://www.nmt.edu/academics/mecheng/faculty/aghosh/2008_Matthew_MS_Thesis.pdf
3. Thesis, M.S.: New Mexico Tech, (2011). https://www.nmt.edu/academics/mecheng/faculty/aghosh/2011_Birbahadur_MS_Thesis.pdf
4. Ghosh, A.K., Williams, A.D., Zucker, J.M., Mathews, J.L., Spinhirne, N.: An Experimental Investigation into the Acoustic Characteristics of Fluid-filled Porous Structures – A Simplified Model of the Human Skull Cancellous Structures. Experimental Mechanics (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-007-9118-910.1007/s11340-007-9118-9 ↗
5. Garley, L.: Characterization of a Fluid Filled Composite for Radiation Protection. MS Independence Study, New Mexico Tech (2015)
6. Maestas, G.D., Ghosh, A.K.: C.Park, Robust Simulation of Radiation Shielding Effectiveness of a Layered Composite. Waste Management Symposia, Session 039:2023. https://s3.amazonaws.com/amz.xcdsystem.com/A464D2CF-E476-F46B-841E415B85C431CC_abstract_File803/FinalPaper_23738_0226040913.pdf
7. ASTM C7250: Standard Practice for Determining Sandwich Beam Flexural and Shear Stiffness, ASTM. (2020)
8. ASTM C1499: Standard Test Method for Monotonic Equibiaxial Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature, ASTM. (2024)
9. Deland, D., Zhang, Z., Kirane, K.: Biaxial flexural failure of woven composite plates investigated by the ring on ring bending test. Thin-Walled Structures (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.10658510.1016/j.tws.2019.106585 ↗
10. Liu, F., Kirane, K.: Type I size effect and failure behavior of woven composites under biaxial flexure. Composites Part B (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11058010.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110580 ↗
11. ASTM D3039/D3039M: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials, ASTM. (2008)
12. ASTM C365: Standard Test method for Compressive Properties of Sandwich Cores. ASTM (2022)
13. Hutt, N., Investigation of Fluid-Filled Cellular Core Materials: : Mechanical Properties Under Compression and its Numerical Validation, Master’s Thesis, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology. (2025)
14. Kevlar: Aramid Fiber Technical Guide, DuPont, (2017)
15. Tyvek 400 Data Sheet, DuPont
16. Aquazone (Hydrophilic) Foam Reilly Foam Corporation
17. Lam-145: Lam-224 Technical Data Sheet, Pro-Set Rev. 5. (2021)
18. Hyer, M.: Stress Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Materials. McGraw Hill International (1998)
19. Timoshenko, S., Kreiger, S.: Theory of Plates and Shells. McGraw Hill Classic (1989)
20. Gorman, D.J.: Vibration Analysis of Plates by the Method of Superposition. Presented at the (1999)10.1142/3967 ↗
21. Levy, M.: Comptes Rendus. Fr. Acad. Sci. 129:1835
22. Yu, Y.Y.: Vibrations of Elastic Plates. Springer (1995)
23. Polykov, V.: Stress concentration in bending of sandwich orthotropic panels under point forces. Compos. Struct. 48. (2000)10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00092-6 ↗
24. Libove, C., Batdorf, S.: A General Small Deflection Theory for Fat Sandwich Plates, p. 1526. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (1948)
25. COMSOL Multiphysics Software: https://www.comsol.com/
26. Avalle, M., Belingardi, G.: A Mechanical Model of Cellular Solids for Energy Absorption. Adv. Eng. Mater., vol 29. (2019)10.1002/adem.201800457 ↗
27. Biot, M.: General Theory of Three-Dimensional Consolidation. Journal of Applied Physics (1941). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.171288610.1063/1.1712886 ↗
28. Gibson, L., Ashby, M.: Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Cambridge Solid State Science Series, Cambridge University Press, (1977)