journal article·2022-04

A Multi-Stage Algorithm for the FEM Design of Composite Sandwich Panels Subjected to Multiple Manufacturing Rules

Javier Sanz-Corretge

Applied Composite Materials· Volume 29· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper proposes a method to design optimal composite sandwich panels subjected to multiple blending rules and external forces. The method uses a two-step algorithm. The first step seeks to obtain the optimal stacking sequence for a laminate, using a blind A* searching scheme over an incremental decision tree. This A* search provides the non-local minimum solution (looking for the best ply orientations and the best core thickness) using a minimum number of finite element method (FEM) evaluations. Once the stacking sequence for the lightest constant-thickness laminate is determined, the second step is to perform a peeling-off process using a simulated annealing algorithm. The final result is an even lighter laminate with a variable thickness distribution. This algorithm is intrinsically discrete and, unlike most gradient-based techniques, is not affected by local minima. It is important to note that the optimization process is enhanced by manufacturing constraints (blending rules), which are fulfilled whenever a feasible solution exists. The algorithm could therefore be a suitable choice for topology purposes whenever the laminate is subjected to a set of blending rules and no constraint violation is allowed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Topology Optimization in Engineering · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Building Energy and Comfort Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Adams, D.B., Watson, L.T., Gürdal, Z., Anderson-Cook, C.M.: Genetic algorithm optimization and blending of composite laminates by locally reducing laminate thickness. Adv Eng Softw 35–43 (2004)10.1016/j.advengsoft.2003.09.001 ↗
2. Altair, : Users manual. Altair Engineering Inc, Troy, MI (2021)
3. Bailie, J.A., Ley, R.P., Pasricha, A.: A summary and review of composite laminate design guidelines. NASA Contract NAS1–19347 (1997)
4. Bathe, K.J.: Finite Element Procedures. 2nd Edition, Watertown, MA (2014)
5. Bruyneel, M., Beghin, C., Craveur, G., Grihon, S., Sosonkina, M.: Stacking sequence optimization for constant stiffness laminates based on a continuous optimization approach. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 46, 783–794 (2012)10.1007/s00158-012-0806-4 ↗
6. Eckold, G.: Design and manufacture of composite structures. Woodhead Publishing (1994)10.1533/9781845698560 ↗
7. Hai-Tao, F., Hai, W., Xiu-Hua, C.: An optimization method for composite structures with ply-drops. Compos. Struct. 136(2016), 650–661 (2016)
8. Granville, V., Krivanek, M., Rasson, J.P.: Simulated annealing: A proof of convergence. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 16(6), 652–656 (1994)10.1109/34.295910 ↗
9. Herencia, J.E., Haftka, R.T., Weaver, P.M., Friswell, M.I.: Lay-up optimization of composite stiffened panels using linear approximations in lamination space. AIAA J 46(9), 2387–2391 (2008)10.2514/1.36189 ↗
10. Irisarri, F.X., Lasseigne, A., Leroy, F.H., Le Riche, R.: Optimal design of laminated composite structures with ply drops using stacking sequence tables. Compos. Struct. 107 pp-559–569 (2014)10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.08.030 ↗
11. Jones RM.: Mechanics of composite materials. Taylor & Francis (Materials Science & Engineering Series) (1999)
12. Karakaya, Ş., Soykasap, Ö.: Natural frequency and buckling optimization of laminated hybrid composite plates using genetic algorithm and simulated annealing. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 43,(61) (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0538-210.1007/s00158-010-0538-2 ↗
13. Liu, D,. Toporov, V., Zhou, M., Barton, D.: Optimization of blended smeared stiffness technique and lamination parameters’. Conference: 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 18th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 12th. (2010). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-307910.2514/6.2010-3079 ↗
14. Python 3.7.2 documentation. https://docs.python.org/3/
15. Rusell S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Pearson (2016). ISBN 10:1292153962
16. Javier, S.C.: A procedure to Design Optimum Composite Plates Using Implicit Decision Trees. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/S00158-017-1711-710.1007/S00158-017-1711-7 ↗
17. Sanz-Corretge, J., Echeverría, M.: A novel technique for the design of hybrid composite laminates based on dynamic programming and dynamic tree trimming. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. pp 1–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1822-110.1007/s00158-017-1822-1 ↗
18. Sanz-Corretge, J.: An A* algorithm for thick composite laminate design. Aeronautics and Aerospace Open Journal 2(3) (2018)10.15406/aaoaj.2018.02.00050 ↗
19. Javier, S.-C.: A constraint satisfaction problem algorithm for large-scale multi-panel composite structures. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 60, 2035–2051 (2019)10.1007/s00158-019-02309-4 ↗
20. Serestra, O., Abdalla, M., Gürdal, Z.: A genetic algorithm based blending scheme for design of multiple composite laminates. 50th AIAA/ASME/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. 4–7, Palm Springs, California (2009)10.2514/6.2009-2699 ↗
21. Grant, S., Zafer, G., Christos, K., Darryl, T.: Stacking sequence blending of multiple composite laminates using genetic algorithms. Compos. Struct. 56, 53–62 (2002)10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00185-4 ↗
22. Laarhoven, Van, P.J., Aarts, E.H.: Simulated annealing: Theory and Applications Springer Netherlands 978-90-481-8438-5 (1987)
23. Abbas, V.: Optimization of composite pressure vessels with metal liner by adaptive response surface method. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 25(11), 2811–2816 (2011)10.1007/s12206-011-0721-4 ↗
24. Venter, G., Haftka, R.T.: Using response surface approximations in fuzzy set based design optimization. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 18(4), 218–227 (1999)10.1007/BF01223303 ↗
25. Venkataraman, S., Haftka, R.T., ‘Structural optimization complexity, : what has Moore’s law done for us?’. Struct Multidisc Optim 28, 375–387 (2004)10.1007/s00158-004-0415-y ↗
26. Wei, W., Shijum, G., Nan, C., Feng, Z.: A modified ant colony algorithm for the stacking sequence optimization of a rectangular laminate. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 41(5), 711–720 (2010)10.1007/s00158-009-0447-4 ↗
27. Zein, S., Basso, P., Grihon, S.: A constraint satisfaction programming approach for computing manufacturable stacking sequences. Comput Struct 136, 56–63 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.01.01610.1016/j.compstruc.2014.01.016 ↗
28. Zein, S., Madhavan, V., Dumas, D., Ravier, L., Yague, I.: From stacking sequences to ply layouts: An algorithm to design manufacturable composite structures. Compos Struct 141, 32–38 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.027 ↗