Influence of Aggregate Structure on Mode-III Interfacial Fracture between Concrete and CFRP
Source abstract
Abstract
One of the crucial issues in the use of fiber reinforced polymers for civil engineering applications is the interfacial bonding between the different materials used. As a load transfer from the concrete to the composite components occurs via shear stresses in the interfacial region, studies of the interfacial bond quality should concentrate on load situations in which primarily shear stresses are induced. In this study, a 3-Point Bending Test was modified to initiate shear failure under Mode-III conditions in the interface between a composite and a concrete component. In particular it was the objective to study the interfacial shear strength between three different concretes and an unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced epoxy matrix system. The three concretes had the same compressive strength (B35 KP, German Standard), but differed in the type of filler material: (a) “heavy” concrete, filled with granite (Diorit) particles, (b) “normal” concrete, filled with gravel grains (Pyrite), and (c) “light weight” concrete, filled with vopourtone (Liapur). The mechanical test results showed that both the type of filler exposed to the joint surface as well as the type of adhesive used clearly influence the interfacial shear strength. Best values were achieved with Diorit-fillers, and the Sikadur-adhesive was in all cases superior to the Dywipox-adhesive. Reasons for these differences were demonstrated by light optical and scanning electron micrographs of the fractured surfaces.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (9)
Show source-provided references
1. Karbhari, V. M., 'Civil Infrastructure and Composite Materials', in Issues in Materials and Manufacturing 41st International SAMPE, March 24–28, 1996, pp. 656–666.
2. Barbero, E. and Gangarao, H. V. S., 'Structural Applications of Composites in Infrastructure (Part I)', SAMPE J. 27(6), 1991, 9–16.
3. Karbhari, V. M. and Engineer, M., 'On the Use of a Modified Peel-Test for Determination of Concrete-Composite Bond Durability', in 40th International SAMPE Symposium, May 8–11, 1995, pp. 1957–1990.
4. Kageyama, K., Kimpara, I., and Esaki, K., 'Fracture Mechanics on Rehabilitation of Damaged Infrastructure by Using Composite Wraps', in Proceedings of ICCM-10,Whistler, B.C., Canada, August 1995, pp. 597–604.
5. Howie, I. and Karbhari, V. M., 'Effect of Tow Sheet Composite Wrap Architecture on Strengthening of Concrete Due to Confinement: I-Experimental Studies', J. Reinf. Plastics Composites 14, Sept. 1995, 1008–1030.10.1177/073168449501400906 ↗
6. Maier, U., 'Strengthening of Structures Using Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composites', Construction and Building Materials 9(6), 1995, 341–351.10.1016/0950-0618(95)00071-2 ↗
7. Eggiman, F., Maier, U. and Fritz, H. W., 'EMPA and Its Activities in Field of BuildingMaterials, Elements and Structures', Materials and Structures 28, 1995, 101–124.10.1007/BF02473177 ↗
8. N. N., 'Advanced Composites', in Scientific American, Special Issue on Key Technologies for the 21st Century, Sept. 1995, pp. 126–127.
9. Weimer, C., Fracture Characteristics of Interfacial Bonding between a CF/Epoxy Composite and Concrete IVW-Bericht 96–16, University of Kaiserslautern, 1996.