Modeling the Tensile Strength of Carbon Fiber − Reinforced Ceramic − Matrix Composites Under Multiple Fatigue Loading
Source abstract
Abstract
An analytical method has been developed to investigate the effect of interface wear on the tensile strength of carbon fiber − reinforced ceramic − matrix composites (CMCs) under multiple fatigue loading. The Budiansky − Hutchinson − Evans shear − lag model was used to describe the micro stress field of the damaged composite considering fibers failure and the difference existed in the new and original interface debonded region. The statistical matrix multicracking model and fracture mechanics interface debonding criterion were used to determine the matrix crack spacing and interface debonded length. The interface shear stress degradation model and fibers strength degradation model have been adopted to analyze the interface wear effect on the tensile strength of the composite subjected to multiple fatigue loading. Under tensile loading, the fibers failure probabilities were determined by combining the interface wear model and fibers failure model based on the assumption that the fiber strength is subjected to two − parameter Weibull distribution and the loads carried by broken and intact fibers satisfy the Global Load Sharing criterion. The composite can no longer support the applied load when the total loads supported by broken and intact fibers approach its maximum value. The conditions of a single matrix crack and matrix multicrackings for tensile strength corresponding to multiple fatigue peak stress levels and different cycle number have been analyzed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Naslain R.: Design, preparation and properties of non-oxide CMCs for application in engines and nuclear reactors: an overview. Compos. Sci. Technol. 64, 155–170 (2004). doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00230-610.1016/S0266-3538(03)00230-6 ↗
2. Schmidt S., Beyer S., Knabe H., Immich H., Meistring R., Gessler A.: Advanced ceramic matrix composite materials for current and future propulsion system applications. Acta Astronaut. 55, 409–420 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2004.05.05210.1016/j.actaastro.2004.05.052 ↗
3. DiCarlo J.A.: Van, roode. M.: ceramic composite development for gas turbine hot section components. Proceedings of the ASME turbo expo: power for land. Sea and Air. 2, 221–231 (2006)
4. Stephen, T.: General Electric primes CMC for turbine blades. Flight International, 2010. http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/general-electric-primes-cmc-for-turbine-blades-349834/
5. Zhang L.T., Cheng L.F., Luan X.G., Mei H., Xu Y.D.: Environmental performance testing system for thermostructure materials applied in aeroengines. Key Eng. Mater. 313, 183–190 (2006). doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.313.18310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.313.183 ↗
6. Yang Q.D., Rugg K.L., Cox B.N., Marshall D.B.: Evaluation of macroscopic and local strains in a three-dimensional woven C/SiC composite. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 88, 719–725 (2005). doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00156.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00156.x ↗
7. Li L.B.: Effect of fiber Poisson contraction on matrix multicracking evolution of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites. Appl. Compos. Mater. Online. (2014). doi: 10.1007/s10443-014-9426-z10.1007/s10443-014-9426-z ↗
8. Zhou Z.Q., Fang J.X., Cox B.N., Yang Q.D.: The evolution of a transverse intra-ply crack coupled to delamination cracks. Int. J. Frac. 165, 77–92 (2010). doi: 10.1007/s10704-010-9506-510.1007/s10704-010-9506-5 ↗
9. Li L.B., Song Y.D., Sun Y.C.: Modeling the tensile behavior of unidirectional C/SiC ceramic-matrix composites. Mech. Compos. Mater. 49, 659–672 (2014)10.1007/s11029-013-9382-y ↗
10. Li L.B., Song Y.D.: An approach to estimate interface shear stress of ceramic matrix composites from hysteresis loops. Appl. Compos. Mater. 17, 309–328 (2010). doi: 10.1007/s10443-009-9122-610.1007/s10443-009-9122-6 ↗
11. Curtin, W.A.: Stress-strain behavior of brittle matrix composites. Comprehensive composite materials, Elsevier Science Ltd. 4, 47–76 (2000). doi:10.1016/B0-08–042993–9/00088–710.1016/B0-08-042993-9/00088-7 ↗
12. Cox B.N., Yang Q.D.: In quest of virtual tests for structural composites. Science. 314, 1102 (2006). doi: 10.1126/science.113162410.1126/science.1131624 ↗
13. Cox B.N., Hrishikesh A.B., Begley M., et al.: Stochastic virtual tests for high-temperature ceramic matrix composites. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 44, 17.1–17.51 (2014). doi: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-122013-02502410.1146/annurev-matsci-122013-025024 ↗
14. Rouby D., Reynaud P.: Fatigue behavior related to interface modification during load cycling in ceramic-matrix fiber composites. Comps. Sci. Technol. 48, 109–118 (1993). doi: 10.1016/0266-3538(93)90126-210.1016/0266-3538(93)90126-2 ↗
15. Evans A.G., Zok F.W., McMeeking R.M.: Fatigue of ceramic matrix composites. Acta Metall. Mater. 43, 859–875 (1995). doi: 10.1016/0956-7151(94)00304-Z10.1016/0956-7151(94)00304-Z ↗
16. Reynaud P.: Cyclic fatigue of ceramic-matrix composites at ambient and elevated temperatures. Compos. Sci. Technol. 56, 809–814 (1996). doi: 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00025-510.1016/0266-3538(96)00025-5 ↗
17. Holmes J.W., Cho C.D.: Experimental observation of frictional heating in fiber-reinforced ceramics. J.Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 929–938 (1992). doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04162.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04162.x ↗
18. Zhu S.J., Mizuno M., Kagawa Y., Mutoh Y.: Monotonic tension, fatigue and creep behavior of SiC-fiber-reinforced SiC-matrix composites: a review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 59, 833–851 (1999). doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00014-710.1016/S0266-3538(99)00014-7 ↗
19. Fantozzi G., Reynaud P.: Mechanical hysteresis in ceramic matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 521-522, 18–23 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.09.12810.1016/j.msea.2008.09.128 ↗
20. Cho C.D., Holmes J.W., Barber J.R.: Estimation of interfacial shear in ceramic composites from frictional heating measurements. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 2802–2808 (1991). doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06846.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06846.x ↗
21. Li L.B.: Fatigue life prediction of carbon fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites at room and elevated temperatures. Part I: Experimental Analysis. Appl. Compos. Mater. Online. (2015). doi: 10.1007/s10443-015-9446-310.1007/s10443-015-9446-3 ↗
22. Li L.B.: Fatigue life prediction of carbon fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites at room and elevated temperatures. Part II: Experimental Comparisons. Appl. Compos. Mater. Online. (2015). doi: 10.1007/s10443-015-9445-410.1007/s10443-015-9445-4 ↗
23. Budiansky, B., Hutchinson, J.W., Evans, A.G.: Matrix fracture in fiber-reinforced ceramics. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 34, 167–189 (1986).doi: 0022–5096/86$3.00 + 0.0010.1016/0022-5096(86)90035-9 ↗
24. Daniel I.M., Lee J.W.: The behavior of ceramic matrix fiber composites under longitudinal loading. Compos. Sci. Technol. 46, 105–113 (1993). doi: 10.1016/0266-3538(93)90166-E10.1016/0266-3538(93)90166-E ↗
25. Aveston, J., Cooper, G.A., Kelly, A.: Single and multiple fracture. Properties of fiber composites: conference on proceedings. England: National Physical Laboratory, IPC. 15–26 (1971).
26. Zok F.W., Spearing S.M.: Matrix crack spacing in brittle matrix composites. Acta Metall. Mater. 40, 2033–2043 (1992). doi: 10.1016/0956-7151(92)90189-L10.1016/0956-7151(92)90189-L ↗
27. Zhu H., Weitsman Y.: The progression of failure mechanisms in unidirectional reinforced ceramic composites. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 42, 1601–1632 (1994). doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(94)90089-210.1016/0022-5096(94)90089-2 ↗
28. Solti J.P., Mall S., Robertson D.D.: Modeling damage in unidirectional ceramic-matrix composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 54, 55–66 (1995). doi: 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00041-010.1016/0266-3538(95)00041-0 ↗
29. Curtin W.A.: Multiple matrix cracking in brittle matrix composites. Acta Metall. Mater. 41, 1369–1377 (1993). doi: 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90246-O10.1016/0956-7151(93)90246-O ↗
30. Hsueh C.H.: Crack-wake interface debonding criterion for fiber-reinforced ceramic composites. Acta Mater. 44, 2211–2216 (1996). doi: 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00369-X10.1016/1359-6454(95)00369-X ↗
31. Gao Y., Mai Y., Cotterell B.: Fracture of fiber-reinforced materials. J. Appl. Math. Phys. 39, 550–572 (1988). doi: 10.1007/BF0094896210.1007/BF00948962 ↗
32. Sun Y.J., Singh R.N.: The generation of multiple matrix cracking and fiber-matrix interfacial debonding in a glass composite. Acta Mater. 46, 1657–1667 (1998). doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00347-910.1016/S1359-6454(97)00347-9 ↗
33. Cherouali H., Fantozzi G., Reynaud P., Rouby D.: Analysis of interfacial sliding in brittle-matrix composites during push-out and push-back tests. Mater. Sci. Eng. A250, 169–177 (1998). doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00589-910.1016/S0921-5093(98)00589-9 ↗
34. Vagaggini E., Domergue J.M., Evans A.G.: Relationship between hysteresis measurements and the constituent properties of ceramic matrix composites: I. Theory. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78, 2709–2720 (1995). doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08046.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08046.x ↗
35. Lee S.S., Stinchcomb W.W.: Damage mechanisms of cross-ply nicalon/CAS-II laminate under cyclic tension. Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 15, 40–48 (1994). doi: 10.1002/9780470314500.ch510.1002/9780470314500.ch5 ↗
36. Thouless M.D., Evans A.G.: Effects of pull-out on the mechanical properties of ceramic matrix composites. Acta Metall. Mater. 36, 517–522 (1988). doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(88)90083-110.1016/0001-6160(88)90083-1 ↗
37. Cao H.C., Thouless M.D.: Tensile tests of ceramic-matrix composites: theory and experiment. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 2091–2094 (1990). doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05273.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05273.x ↗
38. Sutcu M.: Weibull statistics applied to fiber failure in ceramic composites and work of fracture. Acta Metall. Mater. 37, 651–661 (1989). doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(89)90249-610.1016/0001-6160(89)90249-6 ↗
39. Schwietert H.R., Steif P.S.: A theory for the ultimate strength of a brittle-matrix composite. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 38, 325–343 (1990). doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(90)90002-L10.1016/0022-5096(90)90002-L ↗
40. Curtin W.A.: Theory of mechanical properties of ceramic-matrix composites. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 2837–2845 (1991). doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06852.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06852.x ↗
41. Weitsman Y., Zhu H.: Multiple-fracture of ceramic composites. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 41, 351–388 (1993). doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(93)90012-510.1016/0022-5096(93)90012-5 ↗
42. Hild F., Domergue J.M., Leckie F.A., Evans A.G.: Tensile and flexural ultimate strength of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites. Int. J. Solids. Strut. 31, 1035–1045 (1994). doi: 10.1016/0020-7683(94)90010-810.1016/0020-7683(94)90010-8 ↗
43. Zhu H., Weitsman Y.: The progression of failure mechanisms in unidirectional reinforced ceramic composites. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 42, 1601–1632 (1994). doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(94)90089-210.1016/0022-5096(94)90089-2 ↗
44. Curtin W.A., Ahn B.K., Takeda N.: Modeling brittle and tough stress-strain behavior in unidirectional ceramic matrix composites. Acta Mater. 46, 3409–3420 (1998). doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00041-X10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00041-X ↗
45. Paar R., Valles J.-L., Danzer R.: Influence of fiber properties on the mechanical behavior of unidirectionally-reinforced ceramic matrix composites. Mat. Sci. Eng. A250, 209–216 (1998). doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00593-010.1016/S0921-5093(98)00593-0 ↗
46. Liao K., Reifsnider K.L.: A tensile strength model for unidirectional fiber-reinforced brittle matrix composite. Int. J. Fracture. 106, 95–115 (2000). doi: 10.1023/A:100764581775310.1023/A:1007645817753 ↗
47. Zhou S.J., Curtin W.A.: Failure of fiber composites: a lattice green function model. Acta Metall. Mater. 43, 3093–3104 (1995). doi: 10.1016/0956-7151(95)00003-E10.1016/0956-7151(95)00003-E ↗
48. Dutton R.E., Pagano N.J., Kim R.Y.: Modeling the ultimate tensile strength of unidirectional glass-matrix composites. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 83, 166–174 (2000). doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01166.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01166.x ↗
49. Xia Z., Curtin W.A.: Toughness-to-brittle transitions in ceramic-matrix composites with increasing interfacial shear stress. Acta Mater. 48, 4879–4892 (2000). doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00291-310.1016/S1359-6454(00)00291-3 ↗
50. Phoenix S.L., Raj R.: Scalings in fracture probabilities for a brittle matrix fiber composite. Acta Metall. Mater. 40, 2813–2828 (1992). doi: 10.1016/0956-7151(92)90447-M10.1016/0956-7151(92)90447-M ↗
51. Sørensen B.F., Holmes J.W., Vanswijgenhoven E.L.: Rate of strength decrease of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites during fatigue. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 83, 1469–1475 (2000). doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01412.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01412.x ↗