NiTi SMA Wires Coupled with Kevlar Fabric: a Real Application of an Innovative Aircraft LE Slat System in SMAHC Material
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper investigates experimentally and numerically the response of a smart hybrid thermoplastic aircraft slat system subjected to a short-duration and high-frequency event like a birdstrike. The focus of the paper is to exploit the ability that superelastic shape memory alloys have to absorb and dissipate energy compared to conventional composite structures. The final objective of the work is to develop an innovative thermoplastic wing leading edge slat able to resist to an impact of 4-lb (1.8 kg) bird at speed of 350 kts (132 m/s), as requested by the aeronautical requirements. Aircraft leading edges must be certified for a proven level of bird impact resistance. In particular, the main structural requirement is to protect the torsion box and control devices from any significant damage caused by birdstrike in order to allow the aircraft to land safely. A clear increase of the composites toughness and higher absorbed energy levels before failure were also observed. This is due to the fact that SMA wires can absorb kinetic energy during the impact due to their remarkably large failure and recoverable strain and to their superelastic and hysteretic behaviour. The activities have been performed within the European Project COALESCE “Cost Efficient Advanced Leading Edge Structure”, funded by the Seventh Framework Program Theme 7 Transport (incl. Aeronautics).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Certification Specifications CS 25.631: Birdstrike damage. EASA Certification Specifications for Large Aeroplane (2003)
2. Barber, J.P., Wilbeck, J.S.: Characterization of bird impacts on rigid plate: Part 1, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Technical Report No. AFFDL TR-75-05 (1975)10.21236/ADA021142 ↗
3. Barber, J.P., Taylor, H.R., Wilbeck, J.S.: Bird impact forces and pressures on rigid and compliance targets, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Technical Report No. AFFDL TR-77-60 (1978)
4. Wilbeck, J.S.: Impact behaviour of low-strength projectiles, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Technical Report, AFML TR-77-134 (1978)
5. Brockman, R.A.: Finite element analysis of soft body impact. University of Dayton Research Institute. Report No. AFWAL-TR-84-3035 (1984)
6. McNaughtan, I.I.: The design of leading edge and intact wall structures to resist bird impact. Royal Aircraft Establishment. Technical Report No. 72056 (1972)
7. Meo, M., Marulo, F., Guida, M., Russo, S.: Shape memory alloy hybrid composites for improved impact properties for aeronautical applications. Compos. Struct. 95, 756–766 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.011 ↗
8. Paine, J.S.N., Rogers, G.A.: The response of SMA hybrid composite materials to low velocity impact. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 5, 530–535 (1994)
9. Ahn, J.-H., Nguyen, K.-H., Park, Y.-B., Kweon, J.-H., Choi, J.-H.: A numerical study of the high-velocity impact response of a composite laminate using LS-DYNA. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space. 11(3), 221–226 (2010)10.5139/IJASS.2010.11.3.221 ↗
10. Nguyen, K.-H., Ahn, J.-H., Kweon, J.-H., Choi, J.-H.: Optimization of composite laminates subjected to high velocity impact using a genetic algo- rithm. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space. 11(3), 227–233 (2010)10.5139/IJASS.2010.11.3.227 ↗
11. Iannucci, L.: Progressive failure modeling of woven carbon composite under impact. Int. J. Impact Eng. 32, 1013–1043 (2006)10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.08.006 ↗
12. Matzenmiller, A., Sackman, J.L.: On damage induced anisotropy for fiber composites. Int. J. Damage Mech. 3, 71–86 (1994)10.1177/105678959400300104 ↗
13. Paris, F.: A study of failure criteria of fibrous composite materials. NASA, CR-2001-210661 (2005)
14. Kang, K.W., Kim, J.K.: Effect of shape memory alloy on impact damage behavior and residual properties of glass/epoxy laminates under low temperature. Compos. Struct. 88, 455–460 (2009)10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.05.005 ↗
15. Pappadà, S., Rametta, R., Toia, L., Coda, A., Fumagalli, L., Maffezzoli, A.: Embedding of superplastic SMA wires into composite structures: evaluation of impact properties. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 18(5–6), 522–630 (2009). doi: 10.1007/s11665-009-9366-110.1007/s11665-009-9366-1 ↗
16. Aurrekoetxea,J., Zurbitu, J., OrtizdeMendibil, I., Agirregomezkorta, A., Sanchez-Soto, M., Sarrionandia, M.: Effect of super elastic shape memory alloy wires on the impact behavior of carbon fiber reinforced in situ polymerized poly(butylene terephthalate) composites. Mater. Lett. 65, 863–865 (2011)
17. Birman, V.: Review of mechanics of shape memory alloy structures. Appl. Mech. Rev. 50, 629–645 (1997)10.1115/1.3101674 ↗
18. Angioni, S.L., Meo, M., Foreman, A.: Impact damage resistance and damage suppression properties of shape memory alloys in hybrid composites—a review. Smart Mater. Struct. 20, 013001 (2011)10.1088/0964-1726/20/1/013001 ↗
19. Pappadà, S., Rametta, R., Largo, A., Maffezzoli, A.: Low-velocity impact response in composite plates embedding shape memory alloy wires. Polym. Compos. 33(5), 655–664 (2012)10.1002/pc.22170 ↗
20. Sofocleous, K., Ogin, S.L., Tsakiropoulos, P., Draconakis, V., Doumanidis, C.: Controlled impact testing of woven fabric composites with and without reinforcing shape-memory alloy wires. J. Compos. Mater. 48, 3799–3813 (2014)10.1177/0021998313514253 ↗
21. Khalili, S.M.R., Shiravi, M., Nooramin, A.S.: Mechanical behavior of notched plate repaired with polymer composite and smart patches - experimental study. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 29(19), 3021–3037 (2010). doi: 10.1177/073168441036317910.1177/0731684410363179 ↗
22. Auricchio, F., Taylor, R.L.: Shape-memory alloys: modelling and numerical simulations of the finite-strain superelastic behaviour. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 143, 175–194 (1997)10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01147-4 ↗
23. Tensile Properties of Fiber-Resin Composites, ASTM D 3039–76, American National Standard (1976)
24. Tsoi, K., et al.: Impact damage behaviour of shape memory alloy composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. 342, 207–215 (2003)10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00317-9 ↗
25. Kin-tak, L., et al.: Low velocity impact on shape memory alloy stitched composite plates. Smart Mater. Struct. 13(364–70), (2004)10.1088/0964-1726/13/2/015 ↗
26. Rim, M.-S., et al.: Low-velocity impact characteristics of composite plates with shape memory alloy wires. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 49(3), 841–857 (2011)
27. Tsartaris, N., Dolce, F., Polimeno, U., Meo, M., Guida, M., Marulo, F., Riccio, M.: Low velocity impact behaviour of fibre metal laminates. J. Compos. Mater. 45(7), 803–814 (2011). doi: 10.1177/002199831037610810.1177/0021998310376108 ↗
28. Schoeppner, G.A., Abrate, S.: Delamination threshold loads for low velocity impact on composite laminates. Compos. Part A. 31, 903–915 (2000)10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00061-0 ↗
29. LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual, Vol. II Material Models. LS-DYNA R9.0 Livermore Software Technology Corp., Livermore (2015)
30. Guida,M., Marulo, F., Meo, M., Riccio, M.: Analysis of bird impact on a composite Tailplane leading edge. Appl. Compos. Mater. 15(4–6), 241–257 (2008). doi: 10.1007/s10443-008-9070-610.1007/s10443-008-9070-6 ↗