Methodology for Evaluating Manufacturability of Composite Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
It is widely acknowledged that decisions made in the early design stages have a greater influence on the final product than those made in the later stages. In a conventional design process, composite products are designed without sufficient consideration being given to limitations of composite manufacturing process. Quite often some of composite designs cannot be produced with special performance requirement or cannot be produced at a reasonable cost. To resolve this drawback and achieve the competitive designs for composite product, an integrated knowledge framework that supports the quantitative manufacturability evaluation of composite design proposals was introduced. The essential concept of the composite manufacturability was defined through an in-depth analysis of composite manufacturing process. The evaluation flow was acquired according to the hierarchical indices. A stage-based quality assessment model for the composite multistage process was mainly studies. It relies on the consideration that the final quality of a composite product is mainly determined by some critical stages during a production cycle. Finally, the method is illustrated through a case focusing on the quality issue of void formation in autoclave process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Gupta, S.K., Regli, W.C., Das, D., Nau, D.S.: Automated manufacturability analysis: a survey. Res. Eng. Design 9, 168–190 (1997)10.1007/BF01596601 ↗
2. Nagahanumaiah, Subburaj, K., Ravi, B.: Computer aided rapid tooling process selection and manufacturability evaluation for injection mold development. Comput. Ind. 59, 262–276 (2008)10.1016/j.compind.2007.06.021 ↗
3. Ong, S.K., Sun, M.J., Nee, A.Y.C.: A fuzzy set AHP-based DFM tool for rotational parts. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 138, 223–230 (2003)10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00076-1 ↗
4. Bidkar, R.A., McAdams, D.A.: Methods for automated manufacturability analysis of injection-molded and die-cast parts. Res. Eng. Design 21, 1–4 (2010)10.1007/s00163-009-0070-9 ↗
5. Zhu, F., Lu, G., Zou, R.: On the development of a knowledge-based design support system for energy absorbers. Mater. Des. 29, 484–491 (2008)10.1016/j.matdes.2006.12.018 ↗
6. Haffner, S.M.: Cost Modeling and design for manufacturing guidelines for advanced composite fabrication. PhD thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2002)
7. Edwards, K.L.: Exploiting new materials and processes for higher productivity use of advanced composite technologies-material and design. Mater. Des. 25, 565–571 (2004)10.1016/j.matdes.2004.02.016 ↗
8. Gutowski, T.G.: Advanced Composites Manufacturing. Wiley, New York (1997)
9. Christos, K.: Minimum cost and weight design of fuselage frames: cost considerations, optimization, and results. Compos Part A 30, 895–904 (1999)10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00191-2 ↗
10. Liu, L., Zhang, B.M., Wang, D.F., Wu, Z.J.: Effects of cure cycles on void content and mechanical properties of composite laminates. Compos. Struct. 73, 303–309 (2006)10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.001 ↗
11. Edwards, K.L.: A risk-based approach to manufacturing process control use in autoclave moulded composite sandwich panels-material and design. Mater. Des. 26, 690–699 (2005)10.1016/j.matdes.2004.08.005 ↗
12. Pietropaoli, E., Riccio, A.: Finite element analysis of the stability (buckling and post-buckling) of Composite Laminated Structures: well established procedures and challenges. Appl. Compos. Mater. (2010). doi: 10.1007/s10443-010-9182-7
13. Li, J., Yao, X.F., Liu, Y.H., Chen, S.S.: Curing Deformation Analysis for the Composite T-shaped Integrated Structures. Appl. Compos. Mater. 15, 207–225 (2008)10.1007/s10443-008-9068-0 ↗
14. Kardos, J.L., Duduković, M.P., Dave, R.: Void growth and resin transport during processing of thermosetting—matrix composites. Adv. Polym. Sci. 80, 101–123 (1986)10.1007/3-540-16423-5_13 ↗
15. Huang, H., Talreja, R.: Effects of void geometry on elastic properties of unidirectional fiber reinforced composites. Compos. Sci. Tehonol. 65, 1964–1981 (2005)10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.02.019 ↗
16. Gu, Y.Z., Li, M., Zhang, Z.G., Sun, Z.J.: Void formation model and measuring method of void formation condition during hot pressing process. Polym. Compos. 31, 1562–1571 (2010)10.1002/pc.20944 ↗
17. Campbell, F.C., Mallow, A.R., Browning, C.E.: Porosity in carbon fiber composites: an overview of causes. J. Adv. Mater. 26, 18–33 (1995)
18. Li, Y.X., Li, M., Gu, Y.Z., Zhang, Z.G.: Numerical and experimental study of the bleeder flow in autoclave process. Appl. Compos. Mater. (2010). doi: 10.1007/s10443-010-9160-0
19. Sorrentino, L., Tersigni, L.: A method for cure process design of thick composite components manufactured by closed die technology. Appl. Compos. Mater. (2010). doi: 10.1007/s10443-010-9179-2
20. Fu, H.M., Zhang, Y.B.: On the distribution of delamination in composite structures and compressive strength prediction for laminates with embedded eelaminations. Appl. Compos. Mater. (2010). doi: 10.1007/s10443-010-9154-y
21. Shokrieh, M., Attar, P.: A new method for modeling of initiation and propagation of delamination between [0/θo] layers of laminated composites. Appl. Compos. Mater. 17, 441–452 (2010)10.1007/s10443-010-9139-x ↗
22. Zhang, Y., Xia, Z., Ellyin, F.: Evolution and influence of residual stress/strains of fiber reinforced laminates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 64, 1613–1621 (2004)10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.11.012 ↗
23. Ferrer, I., Rios, J., Ciurana, J.: Methodology for capturing and formalizing DFM knowledge. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209, 2085–2091 (2009)10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.05.009 ↗
24. Thornton, A.C.: A mathematical framework for the key characteristic process. Res. Eng. Design 11, 145–157 (1999)10.1007/s001630050011 ↗
25. Bralla, J.G.: Design for Manufacturability: Hanbook. McGraw-Hill, New York (1999)
26. Best manufacturing practices and center of excellence: Producibility System Guidelines for Successful Companies: The Five Steps to Success, NAVSO P-3687. Best Manufacturing Practices, College Park, USA (1999)