Failure Analysis of Glass/Epoxy Composite Subjected to Different In-Plane Biaxial Loading Conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, several studies have been initiated to comprehend and predict the failure mechanisms of composite materials. The principal objective of these investigations is to develop a robust failure theory capable of accurately predicting the behavior of composite materials under various loading conditions. The absence of a reliable failure theory capable of effectively predicting composite failure under multi-axial loading makes this area of research particularly promising. Numerous investigations have been carried out to characterize the behavior of composite materials under diverse multi-axial loading conditions. These studies involve the generation of failure envelopes and subsequent comparisons with various failure theories. In this specific study, the traction/traction quadrant of the experimental failure envelope for a 0.5 mm thick plain-weave glass/epoxy composite is generated. Biaxial tests on cruciform specimens are conducted to obtain failure stresses under different loading conditions. The failure investigation validates the capability of the original composite cruciform specimen combined with aluminum tabs for accurately assessing the biaxial failure of composites. Subsequently, the experimental failure envelope is compared with various interactive and non-interactive failure criteria. Notably, the Tsai-Hill and Norris Distortional Energy theories demonstrate substantial agreement with the experimental results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Structural Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Campbell, F.C.: Structural composite materials. Materials Park, Ohio: ASM International, ISBN-13: 978-1-61503-037-8 (2010)
2. Choo, V.K.S., Hull, D.: Influence of radial compressive stress owing to pressure on the failure modes of composite tube specimens. J. Compos. Mater. 17(4), 344–356 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983830170040510.1177/002199838301700405 ↗
3. Al-Khalil, M.F.S., Soden, P.D., Kitching, R., Hinton, M.J.: The effects of radial stresses on the strength of thin-walled filament wound GRP composite pressure cylinders. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 38(1), 97–120 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(95)00027-U10.1016/0020-7403(95)00027-U ↗
4. Mateen, M.A., Ravi Shankar, D.V., Manzoor Hussain, M.: A review on cruciform shaped FRP composites laminates under biaxial testing. Mater. Today: Proc. 5(10), 20837–20841 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.46910.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.469 ↗
5. Kobeissi, A.: Mechanical Characterization of Composite Materials Subjected to Biaxial Tensile Test Integrating the Effect of Strain Paths. Lebanese University, PhD manuscript. INSA de Rennes (2019)
6. Faddoul, J., Rahme, P., Guines, D., Leotoing, L.: Thermo-visco mechanical behavior of glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite. J. Compos. Mater. 57(23), 3741–3754 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998323119214710.1177/00219983231192147 ↗
7. Wang, Z., Chu, X., Yue, Z., Leotoing, L., Gao, J.: A novel mechanical attachment for biaxial tensile test: Application to formability evaluation for DP590 at different temperatures. J. Market. Res. 28, 4025–4039 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.02310.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.023 ↗
8. Zhang, S., Léotoing, L., Guines, D., Thuillier, S.: Potential of the cross biaxial test for anisotropy characterization based on heterogeneous strain field. Exp. Mech. 55(5), 817–835 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-014-9983-y10.1007/s11340-014-9983-y ↗
9. Andrusca, L., Doroftei, I., Barsanescu, P.D., Goanta, V., Savin, A.: Design of a testing device for cruciform specimens subjected to planar biaxial tension. AMM 809–810, 700–705 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.809-810.70010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.809-810.700 ↗
10. Imtiaz, H., Xu, H., Liu, B.: An attempt to design a universal specimen for any multiaxial loading conditions. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 175, 107785 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10778510.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107785 ↗
11. Moncy, A., Castro, O., Berggreen, C., Stang, H.: Understanding the effect of anisotropy in composite materials on the performance of cruciform specimens. Compos. Struct. 273, 114225 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11422510.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114225 ↗
12. Xiao, R.: A review of cruciform biaxial tensile testing of sheet metals. Exp. Tech. 43(5), 501–520 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-018-00297-610.1007/s40799-018-00297-6 ↗
13. Leotoing, L., Guines, D., Zidane, I., Ragneau, E.: Cruciform shape benefits for experimental and numerical evaluation of sheet metal formability. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 213(6), 856–863 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.12.01310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.12.013 ↗
14. Zidane, I., Guines, D., Léotoing, L., Ragneau, E.: Development of an in-plane biaxial test for forming limit curve (FLC) characterization of metallic sheets. Meas. Sci. Technol. 21(5), 055701 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/21/5/05570110.1088/0957-0233/21/5/055701 ↗
15. Lamkanfi, E., Van Paepegem, W., Degrieck, J., Ramault, C., Makris, A., Van Hemelrijck, D.: Strain distribution in cruciform specimens subjected to biaxial loading conditions. Part 2: Influence of geometrical discontinuities. Polym. Testing 29(1), 132–138 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.10.00210.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.10.002 ↗
16. Serna Moreno, M.C., Horta Muñoz, S.: Experimental evaluation of the use of cruciform specimens for biaxial stability analysis. Compos. Part B: Eng. 286, 111764 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11176410.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111764 ↗
17. Williamson, C., Thatcher, J.: “Investigation into the failure of open holes in cfrp laminates under biaxial loading conditions. In: Gdoutos, E.E (eds.) Experimental Analysis of Nano and Engineering Materials and Structures, pp. 939–940. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6239-1_46710.1007/978-1-4020-6239-1_467 ↗
18. Welsh, J.S., Adams, D.F.: An experimental investigation of the biaxial strength of IM6/3501-6 carbon/epoxy cross-ply laminates using cruciform specimens. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 33(6), 829–839 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00142-710.1016/S1359-835X(01)00142-7 ↗
19. Smits, A., Van Hemelrijck, D., Philippidis, T.P., Cardon, A.: Design of a cruciform specimen for biaxial testing of fibre reinforced composite laminates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 66(7–8), 964–975 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.08.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2005.08.011 ↗
20. Makris, A., Ramault, C., Van Hemelrijck, D., Lamkanfi, E., Van Paepegem, W.: Biaxial failure envelopes for glass fibre reinforced composite laminates. In: Proceedings of the SEM Annual Conference, Albuquerque New Mexico, USA (2009)
21. Ramault, C., Makris, A., Van Hemelrijck D., Lamkanfi, E., Van Paepegem, W.: Effect of tab design on the strain distribution of a biaxially loaded cruciform composite specimen, Proceedings of the 17th international Conference on Composite Materials (2009)
22. Torres, A.S., Maji, A.K.: The development of a modified bi-axial composite test specimen. J. Compos. Mater. 47(19), 2385–2398 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831245805610.1177/0021998312458056 ↗
23. Liu, W., et al.: Anisotropic elastoplasticity and fracture of SCFR-PEEK composites in complex biaxial loading: Experiments and modelling. Compos. Sci. Technol. 251, 110569 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11056910.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110569 ↗
24. Navarro-Zafra, J., Curiel-Sosa, J.L., Serna Moreno, M.C.: Three-dimensional static and dynamic analysis of a composite cruciform structure subjected to biaxial loading: a discontinuum approach”. Appl. Compos. Mater. 23(2), 139–154 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-015-9453-410.1007/s10443-015-9453-4 ↗
25. Liu, Y., Ren, Z., Han, Y., Ren, M.: Study on biaxial tensile failure behavior of ultra-thin-ply carbon fiber reinforced composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 251, 110544 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11054410.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110544 ↗
26. Zheng, T., et al.: A combined experimental and numerical approach to investigate the failure behaviors of 3D woven composites under biaxial tensile loading. Compos. Sci. Technol. 236, 109974 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.10997410.1016/j.compscitech.2023.109974 ↗
27. Bai, J., Wang, Z., Sobey, A., Shenoi, A.: Micromechanical model for rapid prediction of plain weave fabric composite strengths under biaxial tension. Compos. Struct. 255, 112888 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11288810.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112888 ↗
28. Shi, T., et al.: Biaxial strength determination of woven fabric composite for airship structural envelope based on novel specimens. Compos. Struct. 184, 1126–1136 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.06710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.067 ↗
29. French, J., Christensen, J., Mollenhauer, D., Czabaj, M.: A combined experimental and numerical approach for characterizing ply-level damage in tape-laminate composites subjected to biaxial loading. Compos. Struct. 224, 111062 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11106210.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111062 ↗
30. Zhang, C., Curiel-Sosa, J.L., Bui, T.Q.: Meso-Scale Finite Element Analysis of Mechanical Behavior of 3D Braided Composites Subjected to Biaxial Tension Loadings. Appl. Compos. Mater. 26(1), 139–157 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-018-9686-010.1007/s10443-018-9686-0 ↗
31. Beaver, P.W.: A review of multiaxial fatigue and fracture of fibre-reinforced composites. Department of Defense: Defence science and technology organisation, Aeronautical research laboratories, DTIC_ADA191990 (1987)10.21236/ADA191990 ↗
32. Hinton, M.J., Kaddour, A.S., Soden, P.D.: Failure Criteria In Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites: The World-Wide Failure Exercise. Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK (2004)
33. Kaddour, A., Hinton, M., Smith, P., Li, S.: The background to the third world-wide failure exercise. J. Compos. Mater. 47(20–21), 2417–2426 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831349947510.1177/0021998313499475 ↗
34. Reddy, J.N., Pandey, A.K.: A first-ply failure analysis of composite laminates. Comput. Struct. 25(3), 371–393 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(87)90130-110.1016/0045-7949(87)90130-1 ↗
35. Azzi, V.D., Tsai, S.W.: Anisotropic strength of composites. Exp. Mech. 5(9), 283–288 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0232629210.1007/BF02326292 ↗
36. Norris, C.B.: Strength of orthotropic materials subjected to combined stresses. US forest products, Washington (1962)
37. Hashin, Z.: Failure Criteria for Unidirectional Fiber Composites. J. Appl. Mech. 47(2), 329–334 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.315366410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
38. Kobeissi, A., Rahme, P., Leotoing, L., Guines, D.: Strength characterization of glass/epoxy plain weave composite under different biaxial loading ratios. J. Compos. Mater. 54(19), 2549–2563 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831989913510.1177/0021998319899135 ↗
39. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Plastics - Determination of tensile properties - Part 4: Test conditions for isotropic and orthotropic fibre-reinforced plastic composites, ISO 527–4:1997 (1997), https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:527:-4:ed-1:v1:en
40. Burk, R.C.: Standard Failure Criteria Needed for Advanced Composites. AIAA 21, 58–62 (1983)
41. Norris, C.B., McKinnon, P.F.: Compression, tension, and shear tests on yellow-poplar plywood panels of sizes that do not buckle with tests made at various angles to the face grain. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wis. (1946)