journal article·2016-06

Fiber Volume Fraction Influence on Fiber Compaction in Tapered Resin Injection Pultrusion Manufacturing

N. B. Masuram, J. A. Roux, A. L. Jeswani

Applied Composite Materials· Volume 23· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Liquid resin is injected into the tapered injection chamber through the injection slots to completely wetout the fiber reinforcements in a resin injection pultrusion process. As the resin penetrates through the fibers, the resin also pushes the fibers away from the wall towards the centerline causing compaction of the fiber reinforcements. The fibers are squeezed together due to compaction, making resin penetration more difficult; thus higher resin injection pressures are required to effectively penetrate through the fibers and achieve complete wetout. Fiber volume fraction in the final pultruded composite is a key to decide the mechanical and/or chemical properties of the composite. If the fiber volume fraction is too high, more fibers are squeezed together creating a fiber lean region near the wall and fiber rich region away from the wall. Also, the design of the injection chamber significantly affects the minimum injection pressure required to completely wet the fibers. A tapered injection chamber is considered such that wetout occurs at lower injection pressures due to the taper angle of the injection chamber. In this study, the effect of fiber volume fraction on the fiber reinforcement compaction and complete fiber wetout for a tapered injection chamber is investigated.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Jeswani A.L., Roux J.A.: Numerical modeling of design parameters for manufacturing polyester/glass composites by resin injection pultrusion. Polymers and Polymer Composites. 14, 651–669 (2006)10.1177/096739110601400701 ↗
2. Mitlapalli R., Roux J.A., Jeswani A.L.: Chamber length and injection slot location and multiple slots of tapered resin injection pultrusion. J. of Porous Media. 14, 17–32 (2011)10.1615/JPorMedia.v14.i1.20 ↗
3. Ranga B.K., Roux J.A., Jeswani A.L.: Effect of chamber length and pull speed of tapered resin injection pultrusion. J. of Reinforced Plastics and Compos. 30(10), 1373–1387 (2011)10.1177/0731684411422415 ↗
4. Palikhel D.R., Roux J.A., Jeswani A.L.: Die-attached versus die detached resin injection chamber for pultrusion. J. of Applied Composite Materials. 20, 55–72 (2013)10.1007/s10443-012-9251-1 ↗
5. Srinivasagupta D., Kardos J.L.: Rigorous dynamic model-based economic design of the injected pultrusion process with controllability considerations. J. of Composite Materials. 37, 1851–1888 (2003)10.1177/002199803036241 ↗
6. Ranjit S., Roux J.A., Jeswani A.L.: Impact of single and multiple injection slot locations for attached-die and detached-die tapered resin injection pultrusion. Polymers and Polymer Composites. 22(6), 495–507 (2014)10.1177/096739111402200601 ↗
7. Mustafa I., Khomami B., Kardos J.L.: 3-D nonisothermal flow simulation model for injected pultrusion processes. Aiche j. 45, 151–163 (1999)10.1002/aic.690450113 ↗
8. Gutowski T.G., Cai Z., Kingery J., Wineman S.J.: Resin flow/fiber deformation experiments. Sampe Quarterly. 17(4), 54–58 (1986)
9. Gutowski T.G., Cai Z., Boucher D., Kingery J., Wineman S.: Consolidation Experiments for Laminate Composites. J. of Composite Materials. 21(7), 650–669 (1987)10.1177/002199838702100705 ↗
10. Gutowski T.G., Morigaki T., Cai Z.: Consolidation experiments for laminate composites. Journal of Composite Materials. 21(2), 172–188 (1987)10.1177/002199838702100207 ↗
11. Darcy H.: Les Fontaines Publique de la Ville de Dijon. Dalmont, Paris (1856)
12. Shakya N.S., Roux J.A., Jeswani A.L.: Effect of resin viscosity in fiber reinforcement compaction in resin injection pultrusion process. J. of Applied Composite Materials. 20(6), 1173–1193 (2013)10.1007/s10443-013-9320-0 ↗
13. Batch G.L., Cumiskey S., Macosko C.W.: Compaction of fiber reinforcements. J. of Polymer Composites. 23(3), 307–318 (2002)10.1002/pc.10433 ↗
14. Ding Z., Li S., Yang H., Lee L.: J.: numerical and experimental analysis of resin flow and cure in resin injection pultrusion (RIP). J. of. Polymer Composites. 21(5), 762–778 (2000)10.1002/pc.10231 ↗
15. Kim Y.R., McCarthy S.P.: Compressibility and relaxation of fiber reinforcements during composite processing. J. of Polymer Composites. 12(1), 13–19 (1991)10.1002/pc.750120104 ↗
16. Kim Y.R., McCarthy S.P., Fanucci J.P., Nolet S.C., Koppernaes C.: Resin flow through fiber reinforcement during composite processing. Sampe Quarterly. 22(3), 16–22 (1991)
17. Carman P.C.: Fluid flow through granular beds. Trans. Int. Chem. Eng. 15, 150–166 (1937)
18. Patankar S.: Numerical Heat and Fluid Flow. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York (1980)